INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF BLENDED MODE OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS IN SECONDARY SCHOOL: CHALLENGES AND EXPECTATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2022vol1.6874Keywords:
blended learning, Covid-19 pandemic, individualized learning, learning process, secondary educationAbstract
Modern learning is the ultimate collaboration between teacher and student. Much like a doctor, the teacher must assess each individual’s needs, then prescribe the right solution for that person by crafting an appropriate curriculum and delivering it in a way that is meaningful. The principal aim of the research is to get an insight into contemporary issues of the individualized learning against the backdrop of blended learning in secondary school, to say nothing of the future directions for its progress and exercising. The group of researchers prepared a web-based experimental questionnaire (intended for schoolteachers and parents) targeted at illustrating the didactic potential and educational opportunities of the individualized learning as an effective remedy of preventing malign influence and retaining the quality while rendering the learning services faced with unanticipated shift to distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The inquiry-based pattern which was chosen with the aid of a voluntary response sampling technique comprised some 500 schoolteachers and parents from a various metropolitan secondary schools. Qualitative data analysis of the data obtained offer the opportunities for forming didactic rationale of the individualized learning, which could facilitate the learning process in secondary school as close as accomplishable to practical application of the learner-centered principle within a competency-based approach and digitalization of education. Alternatively, the obtained findings and logical conclusions showed the trends of teaching modes, methods and tools transformation of the individualized learning within the conditions of blended learning in secondary school.
Downloads
References
Algozzine, B., & Anderson, K. M. (2007). Tips for teaching: Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing school failure: Alternative education for children and youth, 51(3), 49-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.3.49-54
Connor, C. M. (2017). Using technology and assessment to personalize instruction: preventing reading problems. Prevention Science, 20, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0842-9
Gibbons, M. (1971). Individualized instruction: A descriptive analysis. Washington, DC: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Hiemstra, R., Sisco, B. (1990). Individualizing instruction: Making learning personal, empowering, and successful. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Lapada, A. A., Miguel, F. F., Robledo, D. A. R., & Alam, Z. F. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 Awareness, Distance Learning Education Experiences and Perceptions towards Institutional Readiness and Challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8
Malykhin, O., Aristova, N., Kovalchuk, V., Popov, R., & Yarmolchuk, T. (2020). The dichotomy of information technologies in professional training of future IT specialists: The subject and the means of instruction. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4, 527-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol4.4888
Malykhin, O., Usca, S., & Aristova, N. (2021). University lecturers’ views on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Ukrainian-Latvian comparative studies. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 5, 145-157. DOI: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/725471/
Mykhailenko, O., Blayone, T. J. B., Usca, S., Kvasovskii, O., & Desyatnik, O. (2020). Optimism, interest and opportunity: Comparing attitudes of university students in Latvia and Ukraine toward IT learning and work. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1843999
Topuzov, O. (2021). Osvitnye partnerstvo v systemi zahalnoyi serednoyi osvity: teoriya i metodolohiya. Kyiv, Instytut pedahohiky, Pedahohichna dumka.
Topuzov, О., Malykhin, O., & Opalyuk, T. (2018). Pedahohichna majsternist: rozvytok profesijno-pedahohichnoyi adaptyvnosti socialnoyi refleksiyi majbutnoho vchytelya. Kyiv, Instytut pedahohiky, Pedahohichna dumka.
UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. Retrieved from https:// en.unesco.org/COVID19/educationresponse
Yeh, S. S. (2010). Understanding and addressing the achievement gap through individualized instruction and formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 169-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003694466
Žogla, I., Ušča, S., & Mykhailenko, O. (2020). Capability Approach in Tertiary Technology-Enriched Education: Looking for new directions. Rural Environment. Education. Personality, 13, 200-209. DOI: 10.22616/REEP.2020.024