BILATERAL SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE EDUCATION SECTOR IN LATVIA DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6381Keywords:
social dialogue, teachers, professional support, human capital, flexicurity, emergencyAbstract
In 2020, the world was unprepared for the spread of the coronavirus pandemic. , . In Latvia, respective decisions and restrictions were made at the national, municipal and educational institution’s level, as it was important to respond promptly, flexibly and in accordance with the individual’s health security to ensure safe educational process. During the Covid-19 pandemic, distance learning was provided at most educational institutions, which was not a common practice until now. It facilitated the digitalisation of education, led to rapid adaptation to change and learning to work in times of crisis and limited resources. In the paper, theoretical findings of human capital and the agent network theory are used to reflect the provision of professional support for teachers and to analyse the implementation of cooperation or bilateral social dialogue during the state of emergency in Latvia. In 2020, the Latvian Trade Union of Education and Science Employees conducted two surveys of teachers of pre-school, general, vocational and higher education institutions on the quality of professional life during the state of emergency. The most important factors influencing professional work are as follows: technical equipment of the study process and digital skills; organization of the work of the study process; ensuring cooperation with students and colleagues; observance of teachers’ rights; protection against the risk of developing Covid - 19. Teachers working during the Covid-19 pandemic, essential provision of information technology, accessible and high-quality Internet, development of digital skills, reimbursement of teleworking, samples of adapted teaching aids, methodological and psychological support, guarantees of employment stability, observance of labour law, professional crisis communication with the parties involved in the educational process (employer, colleagues, students, parents).
References
Barbieri, P. (2009). Flexible Employment and Inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, ESR_intro_2009.pdf
Becker, G., (1993). Human Capital. The University of Chicago Press, 390 p. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35396287/HUMAN_CAPITAL_A_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Analysis_with_Special_Reference_to_Education_THIRD_EDITION
Becker, G. (1992). Human Capital and the Economy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 136(1), 85-92. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/986801
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina, & A.V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277-303). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Chesterman, A. (2006). Questions in the sociology of translation. In J.F. Duarte, A. Rose,& T.Seruya (Eds.), Translation studies at the interface of disciplines (pp. 9-27). Amsterdam, NLD: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Global Deal Flagship Report. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_758550.pdf
International Labour Organization. (n.d.). The role of social dialogue in formulating social protection responses to the COVID 19 crisis. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---soc_sec/documents/publication/wcms_757246.pdf
Ishikawa, J. (2003). Key Features of National Social Dialogue: A Social Dialogue Resource Book. Geneva, International Labour Office.
Kalniņa, L. (2011). Elastdrošu attiecību vadīšanas sistēma uzņēmumā un tās ieviešanas metodoloģija. Retrieved from https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/4656/19922-Laura_Kalnina_2011.pdf?sequence=1
Krīgers, P., (2009). Sociālais dialogs Latvijā. Rīga, Latvijas Kristīgā akadēmija, Zinātniskie raksti 2, 59-71. Retrieved from
Labklājības ministrija. (2020). Darba attiecības un sociālais dialogs - Elastība un drošība darba attiecībās. Labklājības ministrija (lm.gov.lv).
Latour, B. (1997). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/P-67%20ACTOR-NETWORK.pdf
Mietule, I. (2015). CILVĒKKAPITĀLA VEIDOŠANĀS TEORĒTISKIE ASPEKTI
EKONOMIKAS UN IZGLĪTĪBAS NOZARES MIJIEDARBĪBĀ. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276542745_Theoretical_aspects_of_human_capital_formation_in_the_interaction_between_the_economic_and_education_sectors
MK. (2020). Ministru kabineta rīkojums Par ārkārtējās situācijas izsludināšanu. Pieejams: Zaudējis spēku - Par ārkārtējās situācijas izsludināšanu (likumi.lv)
Rychly, L. (2009). Social dialogue in times of crisis: finding better solutions. Geneva, International Labour Office, 70 p. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_157973.pdf
SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE 2030 AGENDA. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.theglobaldeal.com/news/newsrelease/Social-Dialogue-2030-Agenda-Global-Deal-Thematic-Brief-June-2020.pdf
Weiss, Y. (2015). GARY BECKER ON HUMAN CAPITAL. Journal of Demographic Economics, 81(1), 27-31. doi:10.1017/dem.2014.4