UNIVERSITY LECTURERS’ VIEWS ON DISTANCE EDUCATION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: UKRAINIAN-LATVIAN COMPARATIVE STUDIES

Authors

  • Oleksandr Malykhin Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
  • Svetlana Usca Rezekne Academy of Technologies (LV)
  • Nataliia Aristova Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (UA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6223

Keywords:

distance teaching and learning, educational challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face instruction, higher education institutions, Latvia, Ukraine, university lecturers, university lecturers’ digital literacy

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to compare and contrast Ukrainian and Latvian university lecturers’ views on distance education (teaching and learning) caused by the sudden interruption of the face-to face instruction due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was also targeted at investigating university lecturers’ readiness to respond to the educational challenges during the pandemic. The international team of researchers set up a web-based questionnaire aimed at self-assessing Ukrainian and Latvian university lecturers’ digital literacy knowledge and skills and finding out their attitudes towards current educational changes. Having absolutely identical content the web-based questionnaire was presented in the Ukrainian, Latvian and English languages. The research sample which was selected with the use of a voluntary response sampling technique consisted of 60 university lecturers from Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design (Kyiv, Ukraine), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine), National Aviation University (Kyiv, Ukraine), Rezekne Academy of Technologies (Rezekne, Latvia). Qualitative data analysis covered a conscientious summing-up of the information received, displaying the processed data in the form of tables and pie charts, comparing and generalizing the data received in Ukraine and Latvia, discussing the obtained findings and making logical conclusions how to cope with educational challenges.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkorful, V. & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The Role of E-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.

Blayone, T.J.B., Mykhailenko, O., Usca, S., Abuze, A., Romanets, I., & Oleksiiv, M. (2020). Exploring technology attitudes and personal–cultural orientations as student readiness factors for digitalised work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2020-0041

Bušelić, M. (2012). Distance Learning – Concepts and Contributions. Oeconomica Jadertina, 1, 23-34.

Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., Sezgin, S., Karadeniz, A., Sen-Ersoy, N., Goksel-Canbek, N., Dincer, G., Ari, S., & Aydin, C. H. (2015). Trends in Distance Education Research: A Content Analysis of Journals 2009-2013. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1953

Farajollahi, M., Zare, H., Hormozi, M., Sarmadi, M. R., & Zarifsanaee, N. (2010). A Conceptual Model for Effective Distance Learning in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 63-77.

Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern Distance Learning Technologies in Higher Education: Introduction Problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), em1578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92284

Malykhin, O., Aristova, N., & Dybkova, L. (2019). Developing Future English Teachers' Overall Communicative Language Ability: Open Educational Resources Usage. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4 Suppl. 1), 134-155. DOI: 10.18662/rrem/182

Malykhin, O., Aristova, N., & Kovalchuk, V. (2019). Investigation into Open Educational Resources for Learning English in Developing Future Philologists’ Instrumental Values. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 512-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol3.3833

Malykhin, O., Aristova, N., Kovalchuk, V., Opaliuk, T. & Yarmolchuk, T. (2020). Higher School Teachers’ Digital Competence: Strategies for Self-Assessment and Improvement. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings the International Scientific Conference, 2, 41-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol2.4901

Murphy, E. & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. (2012). Rapport in Distance Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 167-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1057

Mykhailenko, O., Blayone, T.J.B., Usca, S., Kvasovskii, O., & Desyatnik, O. (2020). Optimism, interest and opportunity: Comparing attitudes of university students in Latvia and Ukraine toward IT learning and work. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1843999

Saba, F. (2000). Research in Distance Education: A Status Report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.4

Sadeghi, M. (2019). A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88. DOI: 10.29252/ijree.4.1.80

Žogla, I., Ušča, S., & Mykhailenko, O. (2020). Capability Approach in Tertiary Technology-Enriched Education: Looking for new directions. Rural Environment. Education. Personality, 13, 200-209. DOI: 10.22616/REEP.2020.024

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Malykhin, O., Usca, S., & Aristova, N. (2021). UNIVERSITY LECTURERS’ VIEWS ON DISTANCE EDUCATION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: UKRAINIAN-LATVIAN COMPARATIVE STUDIES. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 5, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6223