THE CHALLENGES OF DISTANCE LEARNING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: THE CONTEXT OF LITHUANIAN PRE-SCHOOL TEACHERS' OPINIONS

Authors

  • Ieva Bilbokaitė-Skiauterienė Vilnius University Siauliai Academy (LT)
  • Renata Bilbokaitė Vilnius University Siauliai Academy (LT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6207

Keywords:

challenges, distance learning, the covid-19 pandemic, pre-school teachers, Lithuania, content analysis, reflections

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to the education system. Since Lithuania has declared the state-level emergency in February 2020, imposed by quarantine, the educational process was organized in a distance mode. Distance learning, namely, was a platform that pre-schools used to meet the learning needs of children.

The aim of this article is to review pre-school teachers’ opinions about the challenges of distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. The article describes the situation in Lithuanian pre-schools using distance learning during the lockdown. The authors analyse the main problems that pedagogues have faced with - lack of competence in the use of IT, poor support from management, inadequate material base, lack of time and teachers’ self-confidence, the low involvement of families.

 

References

Bijeesh, N. A. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. Retrieved from https://www.indiaeducation.net/online-education/articles/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-distancelearning.html

Brown, C. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. Retrieved from https://www.eztalks.com/elearning/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-distance-learning.html

Damary, R., Markova, T., & Pryadilina, N. (2017). Key Challenges of On-Line Education in Multi-Cultural Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 83-89.

Dyrud, M. A. (2000). The third wave: a position paper. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 81-93.

Firat, M. (2016). Measuring the e-learning autonomy of distance education students. Open Praxis, 8(3), 191-201.

Garland, M. (1993). Ethnography penetrates the “I didn’t have time” rationale to elucidate higher order reason for distance education withdrawal. Research in distance education, 8(2), 181-198.

Golysheva, M. D., Didenko, A.V., Vlasov, M.V., & Asadullina, L. I. (2017). Key Challenges of On-line Education in Multi-cultural Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 83-89.

Golysheva, M. D., Didenko, A. V., & Vlasov, M. V. (2011). Asadullina L.I. E-learning and distance education in Russia and abroad: problems and solutions. Retrieved from www.gramota.net/materials/2/2011/4/12.html

Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Student distress in a web-based distance education course. Information, Communication & Society, 3(4), 557-579.

Jacobs, G. M., Renandya, W. A., & Power, M. (2016). Learner autonomy. G. Jacobs, W. A. Renandya and M. Power (eds.), Simple, powerful strategies for student centered learning. New York: Springer International Publishing.

Kamau, J. (2007). Retraining primary school teachers against diminishing resources: Is distance education the answer? Conference paper, UNESCO, second regional seminar for Africa, Accra Ghana; UNESCO.

Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practices. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198-208.

Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 76-82.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

Musingafi, M. C. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for Open and Distance learning (ODL) Students: Experiences from Students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(8), 59-66.

Musingafi, M. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59-66.

Musingafi, M. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59-66.

Nuotolinio mokymo(si) įtaka savivaldžiam mokymuisi. (2020). Tyrimo ataskaita. Retrieved from http://spt.moletai.lt/dokumentai/Tyrimo%20apibendrinimas.pdf

Sadeghi, M. (2019). A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88.

Salieva, Z. (2020). The Challenges Of Distance Learning In The Period Of Pandemic (The Case Of Teaching Speaking). International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 2112-2116.

Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2008). Teaching and learning at a distance. M. Simonson (Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Thorpe, M. (2002). Rethinking learner support: The challenge of collaborative online learning. Open learning, 17(2), 105-119.

Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities. Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3), 67-89.

Venčkauskas, A. (2021). Distance Education of Children During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Threats and Opportunities From An Ecosystem Perspective. Project report. Retrieved from https://www.mediavaikai.lt/confinement-about-the-project

Zirnkle, C. (2001). Access barriers in distance education. Contemporary education, 72(2), 39-42.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Bilbokaitė-Skiauterienė, I., & Bilbokaitė, R. (2021). THE CHALLENGES OF DISTANCE LEARNING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: THE CONTEXT OF LITHUANIAN PRE-SCHOOL TEACHERS’ OPINIONS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 5, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6207