ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE STUDENTS` LEARNING PROGRESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol2.6162Keywords:
assessment, assessment methods, assessment strategy, learning, studentAbstract
The article highlights the topicality of assessment in the context of promoting learning achievements and students` self-efficacy. The aim of the article is to analyze the sources of literature and stimulate scientific discussion about strategies for assessing students' learning achievements and individual progress, which provide opportunities to develop each student's potential by improving cognitive activity and learning outcomes. The authors of the article analyse the perspectives of assessment of the learning process, systematize theoretical findings on the basic principles and methods of learning assessment improvement, identify and describe the pedagogical potential of diverse assessment strategies.
Downloads
References
Barnett, R. (2000). Learning to work and working to learn. In J. Garrick and C. Rhodes (Eds.), Understanding Learning at Work. London: Routledge (in press).
Bennett, R.E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, policy & Practice, 18(1), 5- 25.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Clark, I. (2008). Assessment is for learning: Formative assessment and positive learning interactions. Florida Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 2(1), 1-16.
Gates, L. (2016). Embracing Subjective Assessment Practices: Recommendations for Art Educators. Art Education, Volume 70, 23-28. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00043125.2017.1247565
Fisher, R. (2005). Mācīsim bērniem domāt. Rīga: RaKa.
James, D. (2014). Investigating the curriculum through assessment practice in higher education: The value of a ‘learning cultures’ approach. Higher Education, 67(2), 155‒169.
Logins, J. (2018). Informācijas tehnoloģijas formatīvajā vērtēšanā. Mācīšanās lietpratībai. (212. -231.lpp.). Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Ministru Kabinets. (2018). Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 747 par valsts pamatizglītības standartu un pamatizglītības programmu paraugiem. Rīga. Pieejams http://m.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=303768
Nagowah, S., Nagowah, L. (2009). Assessment strategies to enhance students’ success. Conference Paper: "Teaching and Learning 2009". Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305032303_Assessment_Strategies_to_enhance_Students%27_Success
Noushad, P.P. (2008). Cognitions about cognitions: the theory of metacognition. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502151.pdf
OECD/CERI. (2008). Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment. International Conference Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf
O’Sullivan, N., Burce, A. (2014). Teaching and Learning in Competency-based Education. The Fifth International Conference on e-Learning (eLearning-2014), 22-23 September 2014, Belgrade, Serbia.
Pietersen, G.,W. (2010). Strategic Learning. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons.
Sarasin, L.,C. (2006). Learning Style Perspectives. Impact in The Classroom. Madison: Atwood Publishing.
Schmittou, D. (2020). Making Assessment Work. Alexadria: EduMatch.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (1), (39-55.). Chicago: Rand McNally.
The Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. London: Assessment Reform Group. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271849158_Assessment_for_Learning_10_Principles_Research-based_principles_to_guide_classroom_practice_Assessment_for_Learning
