MODELING OF THE MONITORING SYSTEM OF LEARNING OUTCOMES IN ADULT EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol5.5121Keywords:
adult education, learning outcomes, monitoring, modeling, adult learnersAbstract
In recent years, the need has arisen for a change in conceptual approaches to the phenomena of “monitoring” and “assessment” of learning outcomes in adult education. The ultimate goal of monitoring should be to strengthen and achieve a high level of responsibility of the learners for the process and outcomes of their education. The purpose of the research is to create a model of the monitoring system of learning outcomes in adult education and to describe a methodology for implementing alternative methods of monitoring. Research methods: a theoretical analysis of the concept of “monitoring”, generalization and systematization of approaches to monitoring, analysis of the characteristics of adult education, modeling of the monitoring system of learning outcomes in adult education, ranging monitoring types by teachers, analysis of the results of the empirical research. The main results of the research: a model of the monitoring system oflearning outcomes in adult education includes preparatory, practical and analytical stages and it is built taking into account the purpose, content, methods of pedagogical communication, means, timing and duration of control. It also includes traditional and alternative ways of monitoring learning outcomes with guidelines for their use in adult education.
Downloads
References
Adam, S. (2004). Using Learning Outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels. Report on United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, July 2004, Herriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.
ECTS Users' Guide. (2015). Brussels: Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/education/ects/users-guide/docs/ects-users-guide_en.pdf
EU (European Union) Commission. (2008). European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Gosling, D. & Moon, J. (2001). How to use Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. London: Southern England Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer (SEec) Office.
Jenkins, A., & Unwin, D. (2001). How to write learning outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/faculty-matters/Hоw%20to%20write%20Student%20learning%20outcomes.pdf
Mager, R. (1975). Preparing Instructional Objectives. Belmont, California: Fearon Publishers.
Morss, К., & Murray, M. (2005). Teaching at University. London: Sage Publications.
Elkina, I. (2016). Didakticheskiye osnovaniya otsenivaniya rezul'tatov obucheniya pri sovremennykh pedagogicheskikh podkhodakh. Moskva: FGBNU Institut strategii razvitiya obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya.
Khutorskoy, A. (2007). Diagnostika i kontrol' v obuchenii. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola.
Kraevsky, V., & Khutorskoy, A. (2007). Sredstva obucheniya i kontrolya. Iz (V. Kraevsky & A. Khutorskoy) Osnovy obucheniya. Didaktika i metodika (270-288). Moskva: Akademiya.
Nevdakh, S. (2015). Podgotovka pedagogov v sisteme dopolnitelnogo obrazovaniya vzroslykh v usloviyakh integratsionnykh protsessov. Minsk: Bestprint.
Rapatsevich, E. (2005). Pedagogika: bol'shaya sovremennaya entsiklopediya. Minsk: Sovremennoye slovo.
Serikov, V. (1994). Lichnostnyy podkhod v obrazovanii: kontseptsiya i tekhnologii. Volgograd: Peremena.
Shingirey, T. & Shilova, E. (2012). Osobennosti kontrolya i otsenivaniya uchebnykh dostizheniy slushateley sistemy dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya vzroslykh. Retrieved from http://elib.bspu.by/handle/doc/6700
Shishov, S. & Kalney, V. (2000). Shkola: monitoring kachestva obrazovaniya. Moskva: Pedagogicheskoye obshchestvo Rossii.
Sukhodolsky, G. (1976). Strukturno-algoritmicheskiy analiz i sintez deyatel'nosti. Leningrad: LGU.
Yakimanskaya, I. (2000). Tekhnologiya lichnostno-oriyentirovannogo obrazovaniya. Moskva: Sentyabr'.
