POSSIBILITIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN INTERIOR DESIGN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol5.4870Keywords:
environment, sustainability, interior design, evaluation criteria, professional competencyAbstract
Sustainable design looks at the environmental, social and economic categories in interactions that deliver significant environmental and health solutions. Common trends in society show that sustainable thinking has not yet become a way of life and is fragmented. This justifies the need for both future and existing professionals – architects and environmental / interior designers – to acquire the necessary knowledge and skills in designing and evaluating projects in aspects of sustainability that are related to public health and well-being. The aim of the article is to determine the criteria for the evaluation of sustainable design, which should be taken into account during the development and implementation of the interior design project. Research methods – theoretical – research and analysis of scientific literature.
Downloads
References
Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., Elsarrag, E. (2016). Impact of indoor environment quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1), 1-11. Database: ScienceDirect.
Beyaz, C., & Asilsoy, B. (2019). Knowledge of Green buildings and environmental worldview among interior design students. International journal of advanced and applied sciences, 6(1), 29-36. Database: ScienceDirect.
Bratt C., Hallstedt S., Broman G., Oldmark J. (2013). Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(1), 309-316. Database: Science Direct.
Celadyn, M. (2018). Environmental Activation of Inner Space Components in Sustainable Interior Design. Sustainability, 10(6), 1-12. Database: ScienceDirect.
Demirkan, H., & Afacan Y. (2018). Setting the Key Issues and a Prioritization Strategy for Designing Sustainable Interior Environments. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 35(1), 201-219. Database: ScienceDirect.
Dzīves kvalitāte, nevis dzīves standarti! (b. g.). Skatīts 14.10.2019. Pieejams http://www.zalabriviba.lv/ilgtspejiga-attistiba/dzives-kvalitate-nevis-dzives-standarti/
Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction of design research: criteria, approaches, and methods. Design studies, 24(6), 507-522.
Grizāns, J., Vanags, J. (2009). Videi draudzīga būvniecība – nozīmīgs būvniecības nozares attīstības aspekts. Ekonomika un uzņēmējdarbība, 18, 26-40. ISSN 1407-7337. Skatīts 12.11.2019. Pieejams https://ortus.rtu.lv/science/lv/publications/7837
Hayles, C. (2015). Environmentally sustainable interior design: A snapshot of current supply of and demand for green, sustainable or Fair Trade products for interior design practice. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4(6), 100-108. Database: ScienceDirect.
Ingels, B. (2012). Yes is Moore. Arhikomikss par arhitektūras evolūciju. Rīga: Jāņa Rozes apgāds.
Introduction to Sustainable Design Practices. (2018). Skatīts 14.10.2019. Pieejams http://www.emeraldcommunityhouse.org.au/introduction-to-sustainable-design-practices/
Kang, M., & Guerin, D. A. (2009). The state of environmentally sustainable interior design practice. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5(2), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2009.179.186. Database: ScienceDirect.
Rashdan, V., & Ashour, A. F. (2018). Criteria for Sustainable Interior Design Solutions. Sustainable city, 223, 311-322. Database: ScienceDirect.
Smith C. B., & Parmenter, K., E. (2016). Integrated Building Systems. In Energy Management Principles (2nd Edition). Database: ScienceDirect.
Tomševica, J. (2008). Vai dabisks vienmēr = ekoloģisks = ilgtspējīgs? Deko, 5, 52-53.
Wargocki, P. (2019). Productivity and Health Effects of High Indoor Air Quality. Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Database: ScienceDirect.
