THE INFLUENCE OF BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS ON SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ INTRINSIC MOTIVATION AT RRI ACTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol2.3971Keywords:
responsible research and innovation, intrinsic motivation, inquiry-based learningAbstract
The article deals with the role of responsible research and innovation (RRI) at science education in promoting intrinsic motivation of secondary school learners from Lithuania. RRI deals with uncertain areas of knowledge and gives students an opportunity for responsibility and self-expression to come to informed decisions about science innovations and their impact. The theoretical background of learners’ intrinsic motivation was analysed on the basis of Self-Determination Theory (STD). STD highlights three basic psychological needs of learners: the need for autonomy, the need for competence and the need for relatedness.
The research problem is formulated as a question: how do basic psychological needs influence intrinsic motivation of secondary school learners at RRI activity? Intrinsic motivation inventory was used to assess the secondary school students’ intrinsic motivation related to RRI activity. The collected data were analysed using simple regression. The findings confirm that the need for competence and the need for relatedness are important internal factors in promotion of intrinsic motivation of secondary school learners at RRI activity.
Downloads
References
Andre, T., & Windschitl, M. (2003). Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 173–197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bybee, R. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning and the science curriculum. In R.Bybee (Ed.). Learning science and the science of learning, (pp.25-36). Arlington: NSTA.
Byman, R., Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2012). Motivational orientations in physics learning: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education,11(4), 379-392.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. Deci, & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research.
Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G. and Ryan, R.M. (1991) Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. The Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002), “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1, 109–32.
Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019
Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., Seidel, T. (2014). Predicting students' cognitive learning activity and intrinsic learning motivation: How powerful are teacher statements, student profiles, and gender? Learning and Individual Differences 32, 132–139.
Lotrecchiano, G. R., Mallinson, T. R., Leblanc-Beaudoin, T., Schwartz, L. S., Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. (2016). Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: A scoping review and domain analysis. Heliyon,2(5), Article e00105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00105
Loukomies, A., Pnevmatikos, D., Lavonen, J, Spyrtou, A., Byman, R., Kariotoglou, P., & Juuti, K. (2013). Promoting students’ interest and motivation towards science learning: the role of personal needs and motivation orientations. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2517–2539.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984–2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K–8.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nolen, S. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 347–368.
Okada, A. (2016). Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education. Milton Keynes: The Open University– Knowledge Media Institute.
Osborne, J. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Pardee, R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation. Downloaded from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED316767.pdf
Ryan‚ R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology‚ 43‚ 450-461.
Rayan, R. Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: an organismic–dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.
Shumow, L., Schmidt, J. A., & Zaleski, D. J. (2013). Multiple perspectives on student learning, engagement, and motivation in high school biology labs. High School Journal, 96(3), 232-252.
Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 40(6), 708-716.
Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39, 97–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
