ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS PERCEPTION OF YOUNG PEOPLE LIVING IN THE BIOSPHERE RESERVE IN LATVIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol5.3928Keywords:
biosphere reserve, youth, awareness, environmentAbstract
Environmental education issues are topical at all levels of education, from kindergarten to lifelong learning. The focus of this study was on young people. Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences (ViA) is located in Vidzeme region in Latvia, where the only biosphere reserve in Latvia is located. ViA researchers started research in this area already in 2006, surveying the local population on environmental, social and economic issues in 2007. In 2018 ViA students repeatedly carried out a study of this area by surveying young people up to the age of 19 (n = 120) with an aim of exploring the views of young people living in the biosphere reserve on environmental issues. Environmental awareness is one of the key factors influencing people's behaviour in deciding on a sustainable lifestyle.
The European Union regularly conducts research of its citizens on environmental issues. In the latest report the respondents from Latvia have shown one of the lowest indicators when responding to the statement "You can participate in environmental protection yourself" – 76% agree with this statement, in comparison with, for example, the Netherlands – 97%, Sweden – 96%.
The youth survey in a face-to-face form was conducted from April to May 2018; it was done by the students and the obtained results were analyzed and compared with the study of 2007 by the authors of the article to characterize the trends in the perception of young people of environmental issues in a specially protected nature territory.
The perception of environmental issues was analyzed according to Bolscho environmental awareness dimensions. In general, the understanding and knowledge of environmental issues of the young people surveyed living in the territory of North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve (NVBR) is positive, especially on resource-responsible, economical use. In terms of attitudes and values, young people express their support for the preservation of cultural traditions. With regard to the visibility of the NVBR, more work is required to explain the functions and possibilities of the NVBR. Compared to 2007, the feeling of pride of the fact that a respondent lives in a protected nature area has increased.
Downloads
References
Arkliņa, A. (2018). Ziemeļvidzemes biosfēras rezervāta ilgtspējīgas attīstības profila indikatoru izvērtējums. Bakalaura darbs. Vidzemes Augstskola, Valmiera. Retrieved from: http://darbi.va.lv/darbi/Arklina_Anda_bakalaura_darbs_2018.pdf.
Bolscho, D., Hauenschild, K. (2006). From Environmental Education to Education for Sustainable Development in Germany. Environmental Education Research, 12 (1).
Druva-Druvaskalne, I., Līviņa, A. (2008). Sustainable Tourism Development on the Basis of Cultural Heritage in North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia. Proceedings of WSEAS International Conference on Cultural heritage and Tourism (eds. Gekas V., Mastorakis N.E., Stamatiou E. (ISBN 978-960-6766-89-3). Published by WSEAS Press.
European Commission (2017). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Eurobarometer. Retrieved from: http://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2156_88_1_468_ENG
Hadley, M. (2002). Biosphere reserves. Special places for people and nature. Paris, UNESCO Publishing.
Ham, M., Mrčela, D., Horvat, M. (2016). Insights for measuring environmental awareness. Ekonomski Vjestnik/Econviews, God. XXIX, BR. 1/2016. str. 159-176. Retrieved from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/161021
Jūrmalietis, R. (2011). Vides apziņa. Apmācību moduļis. Retrieved from: https://www.slideserve.com/max/apm-c-bas-modulis-3-vides-komunik-cija-sadarb-bas-princips
Kokkinen, E. (2013). Measuring environmental awareness in the world. Master Thesis Oulu University. Retrieved from: http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfioulu-201312142043.pdf
Lagzdiņa, Ē., Bendere, R., Ozola, A., Brizga, J., Kauliņš, J. (2010). Vides komunikācija un vides politikas integrācija. REC Latvija, Rīga, p.135.
Melluma, A. (1993). Ziemeļvidzemes reģionālais dabas aizsardzības komplekss; mērķi un struktūra. Vides aizsardzība Latvijā. Ziemeļvidzemes Reģionālais dabas aizsardzības komplekss, Rīga, LR Vides aizsardzības komiteja, Pētījumu centrs, 7-13.
Mitrofanenko, T., Snajdr, J., Muhar, A., Penker, M., Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E. (2018). Biosphere Reserve for All: Potentials for Involving Underrepresented Age Groups in the Development of a Biosphere Reserve through Intergenerational Practice. Environmental Management (2018) 62:429–445.
Sacchetti, S., Campbell, C. (2017). Biosphere Reserves: An “Enabling space” for communities. Journal of Entrepreneurial and organisational diversity, Volume 6, Issue 1 (2017) 10-32.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
Vaeliverronen, L., Kruzmetra, Z., Livina, A., Grinfilde, I. (2017). Engagement of Local Communities in Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Depopulated Rural Areas in Latvia. International Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2, 13-21.
VARAM (2013). Vides politikas pamatnostādnes 2013.-2020.gadam. Situācijas raksturojums vides aizsardzības jomā. 2.pielikums.
Vides fonds. (2018). List of Eco-School certificates. Retrieved from: http://www.videsfonds.lv/documents/apbalvoto-skolu-saraksts-2018.pdf.
Wall-Reinus, S., Fredman, P. (2007). Protected areas as attractions. Annals of Tourism Research 34(4). October 2007. 839-854.
