FEEDBACK METHOD IN LECTURER-STUDENT INTERACTION

Authors

  • Natalya Prokofyeva Riga Technical University (LV)
  • Oksana Zavjalova Riga Technical University (LV)
  • Viktorija Boltunova Riga Technical University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3791

Keywords:

feedback, lecturer-student interaction

Abstract

The learning process at any stage involves direct interaction between the lecturer and students. The article discusses the lecturer-student relationship as one of the factors that influences the teaching process and improvement of learning materials on the example of the study course “Computer Science”. The study aims at using the results of the survey, as well as student tests as a feedback method to improve the quality of the presentation of new material to first-year students considering the basic knowledge of obtained secondary education. The article discusses two methods of feedback: survey and testing. Survey is considered a method with high efficiency of obtaining information, a possibility of organising mass surveys, an ability to accurately process student survey results. Testing is viewed as a method to identify the level of knowledge and skills, as well as the abilities and other qualities of the educator to meet certain standards by analysing the ways, in which a student performs a number of special tasks. Both methods perfectly complement each other and provide an opportunity to more objectively analyse the learning situation. The article presents the results of the study on the example of the study course “Computer Science” for three academic years, describes changes in the structure of the course, as well as changes in the conduction of practical classes within the course, which improved student performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antsiferova, A. (2016). Interaction of Teacher and Student as a Factor of Impact on Both Personal and Professional Growth of the Student. Electronic Scientific Methodical Journal of Omsk State Agrarian University, 3(6), 144-147.

Bessonov, K. (2016). Feedback in Pedagogical Teacher-Student Interaction. Juvenis scientia Journal, 2, 86-89. Retrieved from: https://readera.ru/obratnaja-svjaz-v-pedagogicheskom-vzaimodejstvii-prepodavatelja-i-studenta-14110217-en/

European Ministers in charge of Higher Education. (2012). Making the Most of Our Potential: Consolidating the European Higher Education Area. Statement of the Third Bologna Policy Forum.

Mulliner, E., Tucker, M. (2017). Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 266–288. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/02602 938.2015.11033 65

Prokofjeva, N., Uhanova, M., Zavjalova, O., & Katalnikova, S. (2015). Structuration of Courses at Studying Disciplines of Programming. Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Environment. Technology. Resources", 159-163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol3.179

Ragozina, L. (2010). Characteristics Teacher – Tutor and Students Interaction in Educational Process in Higher Educational Institution. Scientific Statements of Belgorod State University, 5(6), 139-146.

Tan, F., Whipp, P., Gagne, M, Van Quaquebeke, N. (2018). Students’ Perception of Teachers’ Two-way Feedback Interactions that Impact ZLearning. Social Psychology of Education. DOI: https:// doi.org/1007/s11218-018-9473-7.

Van der Kleij, F., Eggen, F., Timmers, C., & Veldkamp, B. (2012). Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education, 58, 263–272. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compe du.2011.07.020.

Vinnik, V. (2018). Organization of Classes with Application of Active and Interactive Learning Forms. Teaching Aid. N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-21

How to Cite

Prokofyeva, N., Zavjalova, O., & Boltunova, V. (2019). FEEDBACK METHOD IN LECTURER-STUDENT INTERACTION. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 442-448. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3791