INDIVIDUALITY OF KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol2.3784Keywords:
individuality, spheres of individuality, professional deformations, preschool teachersAbstract
This article focuses on the problem of individuality. The theoretical basis is O. Grebenyuk’s individuality concept. In it, the individuality is defined as the unity of intellectual, motivational, volitional, emotional, practical and object-oriented, existential and self-regulative spheres which characterise the originality and uniqueness of a person. The term ‘individuality of a teacher’ refers to an integrated and holistic system of seven interconnected spheres, including professionally important components which differentiate it from the individuality of other subject of a professional avtivity. This study adresses three key issues. First, it looks at the problem of preschool teacher’s individuality and identifies the system of professionally important components. Second, it turns to examine the professional deformations of teachers. Finally, the paper considers the relationships between the individuality system and types of professional destructions in the groups of preschool teachers of different age and with different professional experience. The data for this study were collected using the questionnaires: “The Technique of Teacher’s Individuality” by T. B. Grebenyuk and “The Method for Studing Professional Teacher’s Deformations”by E. F. Zeer. Fifty-two teahers were recruited for this study. The participants work at various kindergartens in the Kaliningrad region. The results suggest that the motivational and existential spheres are developed most strongly. The most exrpessed professional deformation is demonstrativeness. Statistical analyses revealed two types of correlations: 1) a positive correlation between the intellectual, motivational, and practical and object-oriented spheres with demonstrativeness; 2) a negative correlation between the emotional sphere and dogmatism.References
Abulkhanova, K.A. (2009). Problema individualnosti v psikhologii. In E.B. Starovoytenko & V.D. Shadrikova (Eds.), Psikhologiya individualnosti: Novyye modeli i kontseptsii (pp. 14-71). Moskva: Izd-vo MPSI.
Ananyev, B.G. (2001). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
Bagadaeva, O.U. (2016). Opredelenie osnovnyh napravlenij metodicheskogo soprovozhdeniya pedagogov na osnove analiza znachimyh stressogennyh faktorov ih professionalnoj deyatelnosti. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij, 2, 9-12.
Belocerkovec, N.I., & Chupaha, I.V. (2016). FGOSDO kak antropologicheskoe osnovanie pozitivnoj socializacii i individualizacii lichnosti doshkolnika. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2, 10-11.
Fedosova, I. V. (2016). Professionalnvya deformaciya lichnosti diagnostika i profilaktika. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij pedagogika i psihologiya, 3 (16), 191-195.
Grebenyuk, O.S., & Grebenyuk, T.B. (2002) Osnovy pedagogiki individualnosti. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo KGU.
Grebenyuk, T. B. (2011). Sovremennyye problemy pedagogiki individualnosti. Empiricheskiye issledovaniya. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo BFU im. I. Kanta.
Grebenyuk, T.B. (2017). Formirovaniye individualnosti studenta – budushchego pedagoga. Berlin: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
Grebenyuk, T.B. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogika individualnosti: dostizheniya i perspektivy razvitiya. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. posvyashchennoy pamyati professora Olega Semenovicha Grebenyuka. osnovatelya nauchnoy shkoly «Pedagogika individualnosti». Kaliningrad: Izd-vo Kaliningradskogo oblastnogo instituta razvitiya obrazovaniya.
Gudimenko, U.U. (2014) Vliyanie psihologicheskoj gotovnosti k innovacionnoj deyatelnosti na vyrazhennost professionalnoj deformacii lichnosti vospitatelya doshkolnogo obrazovatelnogo uchrezhdeniya. Vestnik tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta seriya pedagogika i psihologiya, 2, 214-223.
Zeer, E.F., & Symanyuk, E.E. (2005). Psihologiya professionalnyh destrukcij. Moskva: Akademicheskij proekt.
Khyell, L., & Zigler, D. (2008). Teorii lichnosti. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
Markova, A.K., (1996). Psihologiya professionalizma. Moskva: Znanie.
Merlin, V.S. (1986). Ocherk integralnoy individualnosti. Moskva: Pedagogika.
Mikhailova, O.B. (2017). Professional deformations of teachers: from diagnostic strategies to prevention and correction technologies. Life Span Disability XX, 1, 27-43.
Molchanova, A.V., & Sokolova, L.V. (2016). Razvitie professionalnyh kompetencij i lichnostnyh kachestv pedagoga doshkolnoj lbrazovatelnoj organizacii v sovremennyh usloviyah. Chelovecheskij kapital, 5, 28-29.
Neskryabina, O.F. (2001). Individualnost: na granitse realnogo i idealnogo. Krasnoyarsk: Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii.
Nesyna, S., & Nesyna, V. (2018). The individuality spheres of health professionals. Society. Integration. Education. Proceeding of International Scientific Conference May 25th-26th, 2018. Volume VII., 184-195.
Polyakova, O. (2014). Category ‘professional deformation’ in Psychology. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 146, 279-282.
Rezvitskiy, I.I. (1973). Filosofskiye osnovy teorii individualnosti. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta.
Roslyakova, N.I. (2017). Znachenie professionalnoj individualnosti v obespechenii ehffektivnosti truda pedagoga. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka, 3, 58-62.
Rubinshteyn, S.L. (2003). Bytiye i soznaniye. Chelovek i mir. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
Salthouse, T.A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 13(4), 140–144.
Surtukova, E.U. (2012). Psihicheskoe vygoranie pedagogov: perspektivy issledovaniya. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im P. G. Demidova, 1, 88-91.
Virna, Z. (2015). Tendencies, Dynamics and Risks of Manifestation. Annales Univertatis Marie Curie – Skodowska Lublin – Polonia, XXVIII 2, 123-136.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
