SUBTAINABILITY OF FAMILY VALUES THROUGHOUT THE GENERATIONS AS VIEVED BY THE BACHELOR PROGRAM STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.154Keywords:
sustainability of family values, students’ view, traditional versus modernityAbstract
The meaning of a term “family” differs from one group of people to another and changes over time. The definition has important political, economic, social and ecological consequences, often determining family members’ roles, rights and obligations. Maintaining and fostering the value of strong families ensures a sustainable development of a country. Strong family with stable values is an excellent instrument of resistance and adaptation to the external world and pressures. The study presents the survey done on bachelor program students’ view on sustainability and how they maintain family values throughout the generations. This helps to build bridges over the traditional and the modernity aspects that emerge in the society’s contemporary understanding of a family as a structural and spiritual unit. The methods of the research employed are the following: the study presents a qualitative research that comprises the content analyses of fifty six essays on a perception of a family by the bachelor programme students from one regional university of Latvia. The data is supported by the focus group interviews carried out with the full time students that are employed in the educational courses „Family pedagogy” and „Social pedagogy” (n = 111).Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Cienki, A. (2007). Frames, idealized cognitive models, and domains. In Geeraerts, D and H. Cuyckens. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: OUP, pp. 170–187.
2. Izglītības un zinātnes ministrija (2013) Jaunatnes politikas pētnieka – eksperta pakalpojumu nodrošināšana Eiropas Jaunatnes politikas zināšanu centrā. Jauniešu iespēju, attieksmju un vērtību pētījums [Youth politics for ensuring service of a researcher – expert in the Youth centre. Research on youth values, attitudes and possibilities]. http://izm.izm.gov.lv/upload_file/jaunatne/IZM_EKCYP_Jauniesu_aptauja_Excolo_2013.pdf (as viewed in 10.03.2013.)
3. Konvensija par bērna tiesībām http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=85620
4. Fromms, E. (2009). Mīlestības māksla. Jumava.
5. Gardner, R., Cairns, J. and Lawton, D. (2003). Education for values: morals, ethics and citizenship in contemporary teaching. London: Routledge.
6. Pedagoģijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca [Dictionary of pedagogical terminology] (2000). Rīga, Zvaigzne ABC.
7. Knafo, A & Schwartz, S. H. (2009.) Accounting for parent-child value congruence: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence, in U. Schonpflug (Ed). Cultural transmission. Psychological, developmental, social and methodological aspects (New York: Cambridge University Press), 240-268.
8. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, M., Luyckx, K., et al (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: adolescent perception of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43 (3), 633 - 646.
9. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, pp. 1–69, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Syrkin, J., Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western, Southern Europe: Un update. Demographic Research, 3 45-86.
2. Izglītības un zinātnes ministrija (2013) Jaunatnes politikas pētnieka – eksperta pakalpojumu nodrošināšana Eiropas Jaunatnes politikas zināšanu centrā. Jauniešu iespēju, attieksmju un vērtību pētījums [Youth politics for ensuring service of a researcher – expert in the Youth centre. Research on youth values, attitudes and possibilities]. http://izm.izm.gov.lv/upload_file/jaunatne/IZM_EKCYP_Jauniesu_aptauja_Excolo_2013.pdf (as viewed in 10.03.2013.)
3. Konvensija par bērna tiesībām http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=85620
4. Fromms, E. (2009). Mīlestības māksla. Jumava.
5. Gardner, R., Cairns, J. and Lawton, D. (2003). Education for values: morals, ethics and citizenship in contemporary teaching. London: Routledge.
6. Pedagoģijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca [Dictionary of pedagogical terminology] (2000). Rīga, Zvaigzne ABC.
7. Knafo, A & Schwartz, S. H. (2009.) Accounting for parent-child value congruence: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence, in U. Schonpflug (Ed). Cultural transmission. Psychological, developmental, social and methodological aspects (New York: Cambridge University Press), 240-268.
8. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, M., Luyckx, K., et al (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: adolescent perception of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43 (3), 633 - 646.
9. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, pp. 1–69, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Syrkin, J., Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western, Southern Europe: Un update. Demographic Research, 3 45-86.
Downloads
Published
2015-05-30
Issue
Section
Higher Education Pedagogy
How to Cite
Ilisko, D., & Kravale - Paulina, M. (2015). SUBTAINABILITY OF FAMILY VALUES THROUGHOUT THE GENERATIONS AS VIEVED BY THE BACHELOR PROGRAM STUDENTS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.154
