IMPLEMENTATION OF INCLUSIVE APPROACH IN EDUCATION OF LEARNERS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS IN LATVIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2012vol2.88Keywords:
inclusive approach, sustainable education, learners with special needsAbstract
The present article considers the provision of education for learners with special needs in modernist and postmodernist societies. It emphasizes that inclusive approach in education is a multi-stage process characterized by the following principles: provision of justice and equality, participation and inclusion, guarantee of achievement for all learners including those with special needs. The aim of the present article is to consider how keeping to the principles of inclusive approach in education initiates changes in the practical work of general education schools in Latvia and other countries having a significant experience of inclusion of learners with special needs, and how these changes lay the way to sustainable education. The article reflects the theoretical analysis of the normative documents regulating Latvian education policy and the assessment of international research results in accordance with the principles of inclusive approach and settings of sustainable education.Downloads
References
Act on Education. (1998). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 343/344 (1404/1405), 17.11.1998.
Act on General Education. (1999). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 213/215 (1673/1675), 30.06.1999.
Act on Local Governments. (1994). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 61(192), 24.05.1994.
Act on Medical and Social Protection of the Disabled. (1992). Ziņotājs, 42, 29.10.1992.
Act on the Defence of Children’s Rights. (1998). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 199/200 (1260/1261), 08.07.1998.
Ainscow, M. (1994). Special needs in the classroom: a teacher's guide. London: UNESCO Jessica Kingsley.
Ainscow, M. (2004). Education for All: the challange of inclusion. Notes, School of Education. M: University of Manchester.
Allan, J. (2004). Deterritorializations: Putting postmodernism to work on teacher education and inclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36 (4), 45-56.
Baltija 21E (2003). An Agenda 21 for Education in the Baltic Sea Region. Retrieved May 5, 2010 from http://www.baltic21.org/attachments/no22002_education_sector_report.pdf.
Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education supporting inclusion, challenging exclusion. Retrieved February 6, 2010 from http://www.csie.org.uk/ publications/inclusion-index-explained.shtml
Education development positions for 2007-2013 (2006) Latvijas Vēstnesis, 156(3524), 29.09.2006.
Frostad, P. & Pijl, S. J. (2007). Does being friendly help in making friends? The relation between the social position and social skills of pupils with special needs in mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(1), 15-30.
Koķe, T. (2008). Ziņojums UNESCO par iekļaujošo izglītību Latvijā [Report UNESCO on Inclusive Education] Retrieved February 11, 2011 from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Policy_Dialogue/48th_ICE/Guide_NR08_final_eng.pdf
Koster, M., Pijl, J., Houten E. & Nakken, H. (2007). The social position and development of Pupils with SEN in mainstream Dutch primary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(1), 31-46.
Krastiņa, E. & Pipere, A. (2004). Mācību sasniegumu pašizvērtēšana. [Self-evaluation of Academic Achievement] Rīga: RaKa.
Lindroos, P. & Melen-Paaso, M. Aspects of Education for Sustainable Development: International and Regional Policies and Strategies. Environmental Education at Universities, Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Mand, J. (2007). Social position of special needs pupils in the classroom: a comparisonbetween German special schools for pupils with learning difficulties and integrated primary school classes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(1), 7-14.
Nīmante, D. (2008). Bērnu ar speciālām un īpašām vajadzībām iekļaujošās izglītības vēsturiskā attīstība. [The Historical Development of the Inclusive Education of Children with Special and Specific Needs] Promocijas darbs: Latvijas Universitāte.
Ryden, L. (2009). Sabiedrība un vide – kurš atbildīgs ? [Society and Environment – Who’s Responsible?] Environmental Education at Universities, Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 36-51.
Rozenvalds, J. & Ijabs I. (2009). Latvija. Pārskats par tautas attīstību, 2008/2009:Atbildīgums. [Latvia. Review of National Development, 2008/2009: Responsibility.] Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Salisbury,C & Strieker (2003). Elementary School in Including Students with Severe Disabilities. Pearson.
Salīte, I & Pipere, A. (2006). Aspects of sustainable development from the perspective of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 6, 15 – 32.
Skrtic, T. M. (1995). Disability and democracy: reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sterling, S. (1998). Inspiration! A report and commentary for the Commission on Sustainable Development. Godalming. UK: WWF.
Stewart, L. M. (2000). Connecting Regular and Special Education Pathways at the High School Level. Case Studies on Inclusive Education. Summary of doctoral dissertation. Philosophy Department of Educational Psychology. Edmonton: Alberta Spring.
UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2005).Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All. Paris: UNESCO.
Vislie, L. (2006). Special education under the modernity. From restricted liberty, through organized modernity, to extended liberty and a plurality of practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(4), 395-414.
Wagner, P. (1994). A sociology of modernity: liberty and discipline. London: Routledge.
