TECHNOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL PROJECTING IN THE CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS’ ACTIVITIES IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2024vol1.7894Keywords:
civil society organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGO), project, projecting, project activity, social projecting, technological principles, technologies of social workAbstract
The ongoing war in Ukraine has exacerbated social vulnerabilities, prompting civil society organizations to adopt innovative strategies. This article explores the use of social projecting as a framework to guide project-based interventions supporting vulnerable populations. The aim is to define the technological foundations of social projecting within the context of Ukrainian civil society organizations, encompassing relevant content, forms, and methods of social work.
The study employs methods of analysis, synthesis, and systematization of scientific sources to establish key concepts. Comparative analysis identifies the unique features of social projecting, while legal frameworks are examined to determine the basis for social planning within civil society organizations. Guided by problem-oriented and heuristic approaches, the research analyses and synthesizes existing definitions of "project" and project classification systems.
Key findings interpret "projecting" as a process of project creation and implementation, specifically within a social context. Social projecting is defined as a combined theoretical and practical activity aimed at developing projects for social systems, institutions, and objects. These projects rely on social prediction, forecasting, and planning to anticipate and optimize the social impact of interventions.
By implementing a robust social projecting framework, civil society organizations in Ukraine can strengthen their project-based interventions, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of social support initiatives for vulnerable populations during wartime and beyond.
In the course of the study, the features of the social projecting process were determined: the contradiction of the social state; multi-vector development of a social object; multiplicity of factors of its being; subjective components of the formation of social expectation and forecast; factors determining various criteria for assessing social status. It is substantiated that the technologies of social projecting are determined by the environment of their implementation, orientation towards a certain group of recipients of social services, types of activities of specialists, features of the social institution. It has been established that four approaches should be taken into account in the development of social projecting technologies: environmental, institutional, person-oriented and activity-based, and their characteristics are provided.
The technological foundations of social projecting are defined as a set of content, forms and methods of social work aimed at optimizing social work with different categories of recipients of social services based on social prediction, forecasting and planning of their social qualities and properties. By implementing a robust social projecting framework, Ukrainian CSOs can strengthen their project-based interventions, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of social support initiatives for vulnerable populations during the current conflict and beyond.
Downloads
References
Amin, H., Scheepers, H., Malik, M. (2023). Project monitoring and evaluation to engage stakeholders of international development projects for community impact. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(2), 405-427. DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2022-0043
Bezpalko, O.V. (2010). Social design. Tutorial. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/2615/1/O_Bezpalko_SP_IL_KUBG.pdf
CS.DETECTOR.MEDIA. (2023). 77% of civil society organizations help the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but strive to gradually return to the main areas of activity - the results of the study. Retrieved from https://cs.detector.media/community/texts/185203/2023-02-21-77-gromadskykh-organizatsiy-dopomagayut-zsu-ale-pragnut-postupovo-povertatysya-do-osnovnykh-napryamiv-diyalnosti-rezultaty-doslidzhennya/
Denysiuk, O.M. et al. (2023). Current Issues in Social Work: A Study Guide. Editors: O.V. Epel, T.L. Liakh, I.V. Sylantieva. Uzhhorod: RIK-U, 420 pages. Ukraine.
Golini, R., Landoni, P., Kalchschmidt, M. (2018). The adoption of the logical framework in international development projects: a survey of non-governmental organizations. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36 (2), 145-154. DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2017.1354643
Honchar, Y. et al. (2020). Project management in the activities of public organizations. Change management in public associations. In general editor: Natalia Dmytruk. Poltava. 96. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://initiative.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Posibnyk_Fond-2020_kor.pdf
Kremen, V. G. (2021). Encyclopedia of education. National Acad. ped. Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv. Yurinkom Inter, 1144. Ukraine.
Morris, P. W. G., & Geraldi, J. (2011). Managing the Institutional Context for Projects. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20271
Morze, N., Kuzminska, O., Liakh, T. (2017). Development of educational, scientific collaboration and project management with IC tools in universities. Effective Development of Teachers’ Skills in the Area of ICT and E-learning / Scientific Monograph edited by Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska. Katowice Cieszyn: Studio NOA for University of Silesia in Katowice, 345–364. ISSN: 2451-3644 (print edition) ISBN 978-83-60071-96-0. Retrieved from https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/24183/8/N_Morze_T_Liakh_monorg_2017_FITU.pdf
Mykhailichenko, M.V., Rudyk, Y.M. (2016). Educational technologies: a study guide. Kyiv. CPU "COMPRINT", 583. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://pedagogy.lnu.edu.ua/en/course/the-latest-technologies-for-teaching-professional-methods-of-primary-education-013-primary-education
Pehota, O.M., Kiktenko, A.Z., Lyubarska, O. M. et al. (2001). Educational technologies: Teaching method. Manual. In general ed. OM Pehota. Infantry. Kyiv. A.S.K., 256. Ukraine.
Shinkaruk, V.D., Pesha, I.V., Sopivnyk, I.V., Halaydyuk, V.V., Koshuk, O.B. (2022). Monitoring and evaluation in social work: a study guide. Kyiv, 360. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://nubip.edu.ua/sites/default/files/u188/posibnik_monitoring_1673873800.pdf
Shved, O. (2023). Development of social projects as a type of activity of social workers. Humanitas, 3. 150-157. Ukraine. Retrieved from http://journals.vnu.volyn.ua/index.php/humanitas/article/view/1284/1195
Turner, R.J., Huemann, M., Anbari, F.T., & Bredillet, C.N. (2010). Perspectives on Projects (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891636
Verga Matos, P., Romão, M., Miranda Sarmento, J., Abaladas, A. (2019). The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective. Journal of Business Research, 101. 651-659. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.067
Verhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2012). On Public Associations: Law of Ukraine No. 4572-VI. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17#Text
Verhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2014). On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 1207-VII. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1207-18#Text
Verhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). On Social Services: Law of Ukraine No. 2671-VIII. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2671-19#Text
Yaremenko, O.O., Artyukh, O.R., Balakireva, O.M. (2002). Scientific support, monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of social projects. Kyiv: DCSSM, 132. Ukraine.
Zvereva, I. D. (2012). Encyclopedia for specialists in the social sphere. Kyiv, Simferopol. Universum, 536. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/3491/1/I_ZVEREVA_O_BEZPALKO_G_PETROCHKO_T_ZHURAVEL_N_ZIMOVETST_LYAKH_EDFSS_KSP&SR_IL.PDF
Zvereva, I.D. (2008). Social pedagogy: a small encyclopedia. Kyiv. Center of educational literature, 336. Ukraine.