Sources of Pedagogical Experience in the Study Process

Alīda Samuseviča

doi:10.17770/sie2014vol1.770

Authors

Alīda Samuseviča Liepaja University, Institute of Educational Sciences (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol1.770

Keywords:

pedagogical experience, self-education, sources, student, study

Abstract

The publication describing the studies in the education of prospective teachers, raises student learning as important and purposeful, constructive and conscious process of experience formation in the institution of higher education. Individual achievements in professional careers are based on the quality of acquired education and personality’s competitiveness in the labor market. Studies in the institution of higher education are an imposing source and means for advancement of future teacher's professional identity and pedagogical expertise, whose potential opportunities according to the cognitions of pedagogy theory of social constructivism are not fully applied in practice. In order to meet the public demand for excellence and creativity in educational practice at school, there is a need for a qualified and skilled educator. The objective of this paper is to describe student, prospective teacher sources of formation of pedagogical experience and their developing potential in the study process within the institution of higher education.

References

Bartlett, S., Burton, D. (2007). Introduction to Education Studies. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Brigmane, B. (2012). Pieaugušo pašpieredzes veidošanās mācīšanās procesā. Promocijas darbs pedagoģijā. Rīga: RPIVA.

Dirks, U./Hansmann, W. (Hg).(1999). Reflexive Lehrerbildung. Fallstudien und Konzepte im Kontext berufsspezifischer Kernprobleme. Weinheim.

Giese, M. (2010). Der Erfahrungsbegriff in der Didaktik – eine semiotische Analyse. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, D 7484, Jan./Feb. 2010.

Kunze, I. (2000). Subjektive Theorien von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern. In: Die Deutsche Schule, Sonderheft 1/2000.

Meyer, H. (2002). Wege und Werkzeuge zur Professionalisierung in der Lehrerbildun. In: Berufswissen des Lehrers und Bezugswissenschaften der Lehrerbildung. W.Hörner, D.Schulz und H.W. Wollersheim (Hg.), Leipziger Universitätsverlag, S.41- 78.

Merriam , S.B. (2009). Qualitative Research. A Guide to Desing and Implementation. JOSSEY-BASS A Wiley Imprint.

Mezirow, J., & Associates (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rubene, Z. (2006). Pašnoteiktās mācīšanās izpratne jauniešu kritiskās domāšanas izpētes kontekstā studiju procesā. No zināšanām uz kompetentu darbību. Titulredaktore I.Maslo. Rīga : LU Akadēmiskais apgāds. 72. – 89.lpp.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London.

Terhart, E. (1991).Unterrichten als Beruf. Neuere amerikanische und englische Arbeiten zur Berufskultur und Berufsbiographie von Lehrern und Lehrerinnen. Köln.

Vispārējās izglītības likums, 1999. [Skatīts 2014. gada 15.janvārī]. Pieejams: http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=20243

Veilzs, Dž., Baraņuks, R. (2008). Atvērtās izglītības revolūcija. Diena, 13. februāris.

Wagner, H.J. (1998). Eine Theorie pädagogischer Proffessionalität. Weinheim.

Елканов, С.Б.(1989). Основы профессионального самовоспитания будущего учителя. Москва: Просвещение.