COMPARISON OF COMPETITIVE ACTIVITY INDICATORS AT 100 M DISTANCES OF LATVIAN AND EUROPEAN SWIMMERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2023vol2.7166Keywords:
competitive analysis 100m, sport swimming, underwater part in swimmingAbstract
The research aimed to study the performance characteristics of male and female finalists at a 100m distance when swimming at the Latvian swimming championships in a period from 2018 to 2020 (in the 50m pool). 262 final heats got analyzed. The results of the 3 best Latvian swimmers, males=36, and females-36, at each 100m distance (freestyle, breaststroke, backstroke, and butterfly) at championships in 2018, 2019, and 2020 have been analysed. The parameters for overcoming competitive distance: competitive result in the 100-meter distance; the start reaction time; time for the 15 meters mark; speed to the 15 meters mark; the time of the turn 5 meters up to the wall and 15 meters after the turn; underwater distance and time after the start and after turning; time of “clear” swimming. The obtained results were compared to the characteristics of overcoming the same competitive distance by the finalists of the European Championship 2016. As a result of comparative analysis, statistically, significant differences were found in such parameters of competitive activity as the overall result, overcoming of starting and turning parts, and the distance covered under water after the turn and start. Statistically significant differences were not found in the reaction time to the start signal and in the speed of “clear” swimming. The comparative analysis of the performance characteristics of the European Championships finalists showed possibilities for further improvements of Latvian swimmers. The aim: is to determine the performance parameters of the Latvian best swimmers and compare them with the same parameters of the finalists of the European Championship 2016.
References
Arellano, R., Brown, P., Cappaert, J., & Nelson, R. (1994). Analysis of 50, 100, and 200 m freestyle swimmers at the 1992 Olympic Games. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 10, 189–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.10.2.189
Blanksby, B. A., Nicholson, L., & Elliott, B.C. (2002). Biomechanical analysis of the grab, track and handle swimming starts: An intervention study. Sport Biomechanics 1(1), 11–24. DOI: 10.1080/14763140208522784
Craig, A. B., & Pendergast, D. R. (1979). Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming. Medicine and Science in Sports, 11, 278-283.
Cossor, J. M., & Mason, B. R. (2001). Swim start performances at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. In J. Blackwell, & R.H. Sanders (eds.), Proceedings of swim sessions: XIX international symposium on biomechanics in sports (pp. 70–74). San Francisco, CA: International Society of Biomechanics in Sports.
Hubert, M., Silveira, G.A., Freitas, E., Pereira, S., & Roesler, H. (2006). Speed variation analysis before and after the stroke in swimming starts. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming, X, 6. 44-45.
Kennedy, P., Brown, P., Chengalur, S. N., & Nelson, R. C. (1990). Analysis of male and female Olympic swimmers in the 100-meter events. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, Volume 6, Issue 2, 187–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsb.6.2.187
Morais, J. E., Marinho, D. A., Arellano, R., & Barbosa, T. M. (2018). Start and turn performances of elite sprinters at the 2016 European Championships in swimming. Article in Sports Biomechanics, p. 100 - 114, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1435713
Ruschel, C., Araujo, L., Pereira, S., & Roesler, H. (2007). Kinematical analysis of the swimming start: block, flight, and underwater phases. International Society of Biomechanics in Swimming Conference Proceedings, 385–388.
Skyriene, V. V. (2016). Analysis of possibility of competition distances’ combinations, realized by elite swimmers on the base of individual indicators of technical-tactic actions. “Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports" Vol 20, No 2 (e-ISSN 2664-9837). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2016.0208
Smith, D. J., Esau, S., Norris, S. R., & Bidrmann, J. (2002). A case study of swimming Competition analysis and training leading to an Olympic A final. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Issue: Volume 34(5) Supplement 1, p.76. DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232141674
Tourny-Chollet, C., Chollet, D., Hogie, S., & Papadopoulos, C. (2002). Kinematic analysis of butterfly turns of international and national swimmers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 383–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102317366636
Veiga, S., & Roig, A. (2017). Effect of the starting and turning performances on the subsequent swimming parameters of elite swimmers. Sports Biomechanics, 16, 34–44. DOI: https://doi:10.1080/14763141.2016.1179782
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
