CONVERGENT VALIDITY OF THE SECOND VERSION OF THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL SOCIAL CAPITAL SCALE (MSCS V2)

Authors

  • Ieva Zariņa Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Sanita Šuriņa Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Viktorija Perepjolkina Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2022vol2.6821

Keywords:

convergent validity, loneliness, psychometric properties, social capital, subjective well-being

Abstract

Studies show that social capital has a positive effect on a person's mental health and subjective well-being. Recently, a second version of the Multidimensional Social Capital Scale (MSCS V2) has been developed in Latvia. The aim of this study is to verificate the psychometric properties of the MSCS V2 and to investigate its relationship to self-reported measures of loneliness and subjective well-being. Data was collected online between June 11th and October 3rd, 2021. Participants (N=353, aged between 18 and 80 years (M = 41.8, SD = 13.18), 87% females and 13% males) in addition to the MSCS V2 were asked to complete the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3, the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE). The results show: the Cronbach alpha of the MSCS V2 scales meets the scientific requirements ranged from .73 to .90; Corrected Item-Total Correlations for all MSCS V2 scales are acceptable ranged from .53 – .81 and reaction indexes fall within the range of 2.67 to 4.48; a statistically significant negative association between the MSCS V2 scales and the UCLA Loneliness scale; statistically significant positive association between the MSCS V2 scales and the SWLS; statistically significant positive association between the MSCS V2 scales and the SPANE. The convergent validity of the scale was demonstrated by negative correlations with self-reported loneliness and positive correlations with subjective well-being measures.
Supporting Agencies
Pētījuma autores izsaka pateicību Rīgas Stradiņa universitātei par iespēju īstenot pētījumu SAM 8.2.3. projekta “Pārvaldības procesu pilnveide un studiju programmu satura modernizācija Rīgas Stradiņa universitātē” (Nr.8.2.3.0/18/A011) vertikāli integrētā projekta “Psiholoģiskā palīdzība un pašpalīdzība” ietvaros.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G., & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: the role of friends. Genus, 74(1). DOI:10.1186/s41118-018-0032-z

Bai, Z., Wang, Z., Shao, T., Qin, X., & Hu, Z. (2021). Association between social capital and loneliness among older adults: a cross-sectional study in Anhui Province, China. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1). DOI:10.1186/s12877-020-01973-2

Brown, G., & Greenfield, P.M. (2021). Staying connected during stay‐at‐home: Communication with family and friends and its association with well‐being. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 147–156. DOI:10.1002/hbe2.246

Cohen, B.H. (2013). Explaining Psychological Statistics (4th ed.) [E-book]. Wiley.

Chan, S.M., Chung, G.K.K., Chan, Y.H., Woo, J., Yeoh, E.K., Chung, R.Y.N., Wong, S.Y.S., Marmot, M., Lee, R.W.T., & Wong, H. (2021). The mediating role of individual-level social capital among worries, mental health and subjective well-being among adults in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. Published. DOI:10.1007/s12144-021-02316-z

Chuang, Y.C., Huang, Y.L., Tseng, K.C., Yen, C.H., & Yang, L.H. (2015). Social Capital and Health-Protective Behavior Intentions in an Influenza Pandemic. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0122970. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122970

Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Sujective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C.R. Snyder & S.J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–73). Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2905

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247–266. DOI:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

Eagle, D.E., Hybels, C.F., & Proeschold-Bell, R.J. (2018). Perceived social support, received social support, and depression among clergy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(7), 2055–2073. DOI:10.1177/0265407518776134

Ehsan, A., Klaas, H.S., Bastianen, A., & Spini, D. (2019). Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews. SSM - Population Health, 8, 100425. DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100425

Hagerty, B.M.K., & Patusky, K. (1995). Developing a Measure Of Sense of Belonging. Nursing Research, 44(1), 9-13. DOI:10.1097/00006199-199501000-00003

Hao, F., Shao, W., & Huang, W. (2021). Understanding the influence of contextual factors and individual social capital on American public mask wearing in response to COVID–19. Health & Place, 68, 102537. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102537

Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional Trust and Subjective Well-Being across the EU. Kyklos, 59(1), 43–62. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00319.x

Krueger, F., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2019). Toward a Model of Interpersonal Trust Drawn from Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(2), 92–101. DOI:10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.004

Levasseur, M., Richard, L., Gauvin, L., & Raymond, M. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2141–2149. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041

Lin, C., Imani, V., Majd, N. R., Ghasemi, Z., Griffiths, M. D., Hamilton, K., Hagger, M. S., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). Using an integrated social cognition model to predict COVID‐19 preventive behaviours. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(4), 981–1005. DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12465

Luhmann, M., & Hawkley, L. C. (2016). Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 943–959. DOI:10.1037/dev0000117

Magson, N.R., Craven, R.G., & Bodkin-Andrews, G. (2014). Measuring Social Capital: The Development of the Social Capital and Cohesion Scale Scale and the Associations between Social Capital and Mental Health. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 202–216. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1041672

Nyqvist, F., Victor, C.R., Forsman, A.K., & Cattan, M. (2016). The association between social capital and loneliness in different age groups: a population-based study in Western Finland. BMC Public Health, 16(1). DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3248-x

Perlman, D., & Peplau, L.A. (1998). Loneliness. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 571–581. Retrieved from https://peplau.psych.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/141/2017/07/Perlman-Peplau-98.pdf

Portela, M., Neira, I., & Salinas-Jiménez, M.D.M. (2012). Social Capital and Subjective Wellbeing in Europe: A New Approach on Social Capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493–511. DOI:10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x

Rapolienė, G., & Aartsen, M. (2021). Lonely societies: low trust societies? Further explanations for national variations in loneliness among older Europeans. European Journal of Ageing. DOI:10.1007/s10433-021-00649-z

Raščevska, M. (2005). Psiholoģisko testu un aptauju konstruēšana un adaptācija. Rīga: RaKa

Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of Trust. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447–462. DOI:10.1177/0022022108318096

Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2

Salehi, A., Ehrlich, C., Kendall, E., & Sav, A. (2018). Bonding and bridging social capital in the recovery of severe mental illness: a synthesis of qualitative research. Journal of Mental Health, 28(3), 331–339. DOI:10.1080/09638237.2018.1466033

Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(3), 251–279. DOI:10.1111/aphw.12027

Sun, J., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2020). Is well-being associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1478–1496. DOI:10.1037/pspp0000272

Šuriņa, S., & Mārtinsone, K. (2020). Conceptualization of social capital in cross-sectional design studies: rapid review of literature. society. integration. education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 7, 177. DOI:10.17770/sie2020vol7.4973

Šuriņa, S., Mārtinsone, K. Perepjolkina, V., & Ozerska, I. (22.04.2021.). Sociālā kapitāla indikatoru saistība ar spēju adaptēties Covid-19 pandēmijas apstākļos. [Mutisks referāts]. 7.Starptautiskā zinātniski praktiskā konference VESELĪBA UN PERSONĪBAS ATTĪSTĪBA: STARPDISCIPLINĀŖA PIEEJA, Rīga, Latvija.

Šuriņa, S., Maķevica, D., Ozerska, I., Zariņa I., & Grate, E. (15.10.2021.). Sociālā kapitāla izvērtēšanas instrumenta izveide. [Mutisks referāts]. Zinātniskā konference ’’Psihologa preofesionālā darbība un pētījumi praksei’’, Rīga, Latvija.

Theurer, K., & Wister, A. (2009). Altruistic behaviour and social capital as predictors of well-being among older Canadians. Ageing and Society, 30(1), 157–181. DOI:10.1017/s0144686x09008848

Downloads

Published

2022-05-19

How to Cite

Zariņa, I., Šuriņa, S., & Perepjolkina, V. (2022). CONVERGENT VALIDITY OF THE SECOND VERSION OF THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL SOCIAL CAPITAL SCALE (MSCS V2). SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2022vol2.6821