KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND COVID-19-RELATED BEHAVIOR AMONG INDIVIDUALS AGED 50 AND OLDER IN LATVIA

Authors

  • Ilona Gehtmane-Hofmane Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Madara Tēraudkalna Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Olga Rajevska Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Ilze Koroļeva University of Latvia (LV)
  • Ieva Reine Riga Stradiņš University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol4.6462

Keywords:

Attitudes, COVID-19, Grounded Theory Approach, health literacy, health-protective behavior, knowledge

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the WHO on March 11, 2020, due to its high infection rate, which caused thousands of deaths worldwide and expanding. The evolving outbreak of COVID-19 requires health-protective behavior that can alleviate the severity of an epidemic. Therefore, recognizing the underlying drivers of health-protective behavior against COVID-19 is urgently needed to form policy responses. The purpose of this study was to investigate the individual-level underlying drivers affecting the formation of knowledge, attitudes, and COVID-19-related health-protective behavior among individuals aged 50 and older who are more vulnerable to complications of infection because of their age. The factors making individuals more vulnerable are also associated with the ability to access and understand information, make well-informed decisions, and take health-protective and promoting actions, especially when information itself is not timely, trusted, consistent, or actionable. The researchers used data from a representative population sample consisting of 50-80-year-old individuals, obtained from in-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews during July – August 2020, between the first and second waves of COVID-19. For conducting qualitative data analyses, the Grounded Theory (GT) approach for developing code structure was used.

 

References

Abdel-Latif, M. M. M. (2020). The enigma of health literacy and COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health, 185, 95-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.030

Abel, T., & McQueen, D. (2020). Critical health literacy in pandemics: the special case of COVID-19. Health Promotion International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa141

Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826

Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26(2), 136–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136

Chamberlain-Salaun, J., Mills, J., & Usher, K. (2013). Linking symbolic interactionism and grounded theory methods in a research design: from Corbin and Strauss’ assumptions to action. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013505757

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.lv/books?hl=lv&lr=&id=2ThdBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=f_jV7HlBxU&sig=RLKSpitGFBwxu8lLsEamuESYexI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Chavarría, E., Diba, F., Marcus Marthoenis, M. E., Reuter A., Rogge, L., & Vollmer, S. (2020). Knowing versus doing: Protective health behavior against COVID-19 in Indonesia. Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Courant Research Centre - Poverty, Equity and Growth (CRC-PEG),

Göttingen Discussion Papers. (n.d.). No. 273, Datafile. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/219320/1/1700639986.pdf

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.lv/books?hl=lv&lr=&id=hZ6kBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=6jL8Mu9EV-&sig=o9DXF_y7FuH5vyNDG6vhKq9YVY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Dupas, P. (2011). Health Behavior in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 425–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125029

Fairchild, A.L., Bayer R., Green, S.H., Colgrove J., Kilgore E., Sweeney M., & Varma, J.K. (2018). The Two Faces of Fear: A History of Hard-Hitting Public Health Campaigns Against Tobacco and AIDS. American Journal of Public Health, 108, 1180-1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304516

Ornell, F., Schuch, J.B., Sordi, A. O., & Kessler, F. H. P. (2020). “Pandemic fear”and COVID-19: mental health burden and strategies. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-0008

Paakkari, L., & Okan, O. (2020). COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), 249-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30086-4

Pampel, F. C., Krueger, P.M., & Denney, J.T. (2010). Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Behaviors. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 349-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102529

Person, B., Sy, F., Holton, K., Govert, B., Liang, A., Garza, B., & Zauderer, L. (2004). Fear and Stigma: The Epidemic within the SARS Outbreak. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(2), 358-363. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1002.030750

Riva, M., Benedetti, M., & Cesana, G. (2014). Pandemic Fear and Literature: Observations from Jack London’s The Scarlet Plague. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 20(10), 1753-1757. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2010.130278

Savadori, L., & Lauriola, M. (2021). Risk Perception and Protective Behaviors During the Rise of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577331

Simpson, J. K. (2017). Appeal to fear in health care: appropriate or inappropriate? Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 25(27). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-017-0157-8

Sorensen, K., Pelikan J. M., Röthlin F., Ganahl k., Slonska Z., Doyle G., Fullam J., Kondilis B., Agrafiotis D., Uiters E., Falcon M., Mensing M., Tchamov K., van den Broucke, S., & Brand, H. (2015). Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1053–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043

Sorensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., & Brand, H. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12(80). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80

Tognotti, E. (2013). Lessons from the History of Quarantine, from Plague to Influenza A. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 19(2), 254-259. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1902.120312

Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet Public Health. World report, 395(10225), 676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X

Zwart, O., Veldhuijzen, I.K., Elam, G., Aro, A.R., Abraham T., Bishop, G. D., Voeten, H. A. C. M., Richardus, J.H., & Brug, J. (2009). Perceived Threat, Risk Perception, and Efficacy Beliefs Related to SARS and Other (Emerging) Infectious Diseases: Results of an International Survey. International Journal of Behavior Medicine, 16, 30–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-008-9008-2

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Gehtmane-Hofmane, I., Tēraudkalna, M., Rajevska, O., Koroļeva, I., & Reine, I. (2021). KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND COVID-19-RELATED BEHAVIOR AMONG INDIVIDUALS AGED 50 AND OLDER IN LATVIA. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol4.6462