THE POTENTIAL AND WORKING VOCAL RANGE OF GIRLS AGED 6 TO 12

Authors

  • Madara Ivane Liepaja University (LV)
  • Baiba Trinīte Liepaja University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol4.6443

Keywords:

girls, vocal range, solo singing, pre-mutation, objective and subjective evaluation

Abstract

Aim of this study is to determine the potential and working vocal range in the results of objective and subjective voice range evaluation in elementary school girls – solo singers. Theoretical part contains review of other authors’ studies related to child’s voice range from 6 to 12 years. Practical part of the study offered making of the phonetogram by using Voice Range Profile software (CSL 4500, Kay Pentax, USA) as an objective method for voice range evaluation. For subjective voice analysis, a voice range evaluation in form of vocal exercises was performed. It is understood that the objective voice evaluation reflects the potential of girls’ voice range, while the subjective evaluation – current working voice range. Fourteen girls attending solo singing classes were part of this study (medium age: 9.14 years; SD: 1.79 years; age range: 6-12 years). Three study groups were formed: 6-8 year old girls (n = 5); 9-10 year old girls (n=5); 11-12 year old girls (n=4). In 6-8 year old girls, VRP was from sol# (204.31 Hz, SD: 26, 05) to do3 (1047.72, SD: 409.70), but in subjective voice range evaluation, it was from la (220.28 Hz, SD: 18.88) to fa2 (775.90 Hz, SD: 70.64). In the group from 9-10 year old girls VRP range was from fa (171.25 Hz, SD: 16.03) to re#3 (1224.47 Hz, SD: 156.12), but current working voice range was from sol (208.79 Hz, SD: 24.90) to sol#2 (842.20 Hz, SD: 132.80). In 11-12 years old girls objective VRP results were fa# (186.54 Hz, SD: 27.76) to re#3 (1277.61 Hz, SD: 80.09), while from sol (208.23 Hz, SD: 12.16) to si2 (933.46 Hz, SD: 175.22) the work range was. In discussion part findings by other authors are compared to the objective and subjective voice range data acquired in this study. It is concluded that potential child’s voice range in girls 6-12 years of age exceeds two octaves yet working range reaches up to two octaves.

 

References

Amir, O., Amir, N. & Michaeli, O. (2005). Evaluating the Influence of Warmup on Singing Voice. Quality Using Acoustic Measures. Journal of Voice, 19(2), 252–260. DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.008

Batņa, L. (2020). Skolas kora darba metodika. Rīga: Musica Baltica.

Bellavance, F., Landry, S., & Schiehll, E. (2013). Procedural Justice in Managerial Performance Evaluation: Effects of Subjectivity, Relationship Quality, and Voice Opportunity. The British Accounting. Review, 45, 149–166. DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2013.06.013

Cartei, V., Cowles, W., Banerjee, R. & Reby, D. (2014). Control of voice gender in pre-pubertal children. The British journal of developmental psychology, 32(1), 100-106. DOI:10.1111/bjdp.12027

Čepmena, Dž. (2006). Dziedāšana un dziedāšanas apmācība, holistiska pieeja klasiskai balsij. Tulkojis Toms Ostrovskis. Neiespiests darbs. Glabājas Jāzepa Vītola Latvijas Mūzikas akadēmijā.

Damste, P. H. (1970). The phonetogram. Practica Otology-Rhinology-Laryngologica, 32, 185-187.

Davidova, J., Čuang, M., Rauduvaite, A. un Zavadska, G. (2017). 6-8 gadus vecu bērnu balss aparāta un muzikālās dzirdes koordinācijas veidošanās un attīstība dziedāšanas apguves procesā. Daugavpils: Daugavpils Universitātes Akadēmiskais apgāds "Saule".

Elliot, N., Sundberg, J. & Gramming, P. (1995). What Happens During Vocal Warm-Up? Journal of Voice, 9(1), 37-44. DOI:10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80221-8

Fuchs, M., Meuret, S., Geistner, D., Pfohl, W., Thiel, S., Dietz, A. & Gelbrich, G. (2008). Empirical Criteria for Establishing a Classification of Singing Activity in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Voice, 22(6), 649-657. DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.02.004

Gailīte, I. (2005). Darbs ar bērnu kori. Rīga: Izdevniecība Raka.

Girdzijauskienė, R., Jankevičienė, Ž. ir Rimkutė-Jankuvienė, S. (2017). Dainavimas be sienų. Vokalinio ugdymo tradicijos ir inovacijos. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos Universitetas.

Greenlee, C. W. (2006). The 15-Minute Vocal Warm-up CD and Booklet. Kelseywille: Earthen Vessel Productions.

Hacki, T. & Heitmüller, S. (1999). Development of the child’s voice: premutation, mutation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 49(1), S141-S144. DOI:10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00150-0

Lazoryszczak, M. (2020). Spectral features in the singing voice evaluation using simulated Imperfections. 24th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering. Systems. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1366–1373. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.146

Ma, E., Robertson, J., Radford, C., Vagne, S., El-Halabi, R. & Yiu, E. (2007). Reability of Speaking and Maximum Voice Range Measures in Screening of Dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 21(4), 397-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.03.004.

Mackiewicz-Nartowicz, H., Sinkiewicz, A. & Bielecka, A., (2014). Long term results of childhood dysphonia treatment. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78(5), 753-755. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.002

Pieper, L. H., Körner, M., Wiedemann, M., Ludwig, A., Werner, F., Meuret, S. & Fuchs, M. (2020). Analyzing Longitudinal Data on Singing Voice Parameters of Boys and Girls Aged 8-12,5 and Possible Effects a Music Pedagogical Intervention. Journal of Voice, ahead of print. Date of electronic publication 22.08.2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.012

Pribuisiene, R., Uloza, V. & Kardisiene, V. (2011). Voice Characteristics of Children Aged Between 6 and 13 Years: Impact of Age, gender and Vocal Training. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 36(4), 150-155. DOI: 10.3109/14015439.2011.569756

Schutte, H. K. & Seider, W. (1983). Recomendations by the Union of European phoniatricans (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. FoliaPhoniatrica et Logopaedica, 35, 286-288. DOI: 10.1159/000265703

Siupsinskiene, N. & Lycke, H. (2011). Effects of Vocal Training on Singing and Speaking Voice Characteristics in Vocally Healthy Adults and Children Based on Choral and Nonchoral Data. Journal of Voice, 25(4), 177-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.03.010

Stemple, J., Roy, N., & Klaben.B. K. (2014). Clinical voice pathology: theory and management, 5th edition. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.

Sweet, B. (2015). The Adolescent Female Changing Voice: A Phenomenological Investigation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 170-88. DOI:10.1177/0022429415570755

Sweet, B. (2016). Keeping the Glass Half Full. Teaching Adolescents with a Holistic Perspective. Cholar Journal, 57(3), 6-14. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=90159e24-c77a-4e6e-b3b1-725f558c7a67%40sessionmgr4006

Szinalski, T. P. (2014). Plasticity and Online Tone Generator now work in Firefox and Chrome. Retrieved from: https://blog.szynalski.com/2014/04/plasticity-and-online-tone-generator-now-work-on-firefox-and-chrome/

Trollinger, V. (2007). Pediatric Vocal Development and Voice Science: Implications for Teaching Singing. General Music Today, 20(3), 19-25. DOI: 10.1177/10483713070200030105

Trinīte, B. (2007). Balss un tās traucējumi. Liepāja: LiePa.

Vilde, I. (2013). Sākumskolēnu muzikalitātes attīstība mūzikas mācībās. Rīga: LU, promocijas darbs.

Wuyts, F., Heylen, L., Rooman, R., Mertens, F., Van de Heyning, P. H., Du Caju, M. & De Bodt, M. (2003). Effects of Age, Sex and Disorder on Voice Range Profile Characteristics of 230 children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 112(6), 540-548. DOI: 10.1177/000348940311200611

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Ivane, M., & Trinīte, B. (2021). THE POTENTIAL AND WORKING VOCAL RANGE OF GIRLS AGED 6 TO 12. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4, 550-563. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol4.6443