COMPETITIVENESS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS IN THE MULTILEVEL ENVIRONMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Irēna Katane Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LV)
  • Marina Troškova Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol1.6387

Keywords:

academic staff, competition, competitiveness, higher education, multi-level environment, sustainability of higher education

Abstract

One of the tasks of modern education is to ensure the sustainability of higher education in the ever-changing environment in the context of globalization and glocalization. Under these conditions, cooperation in higher education is becoming more important as one of the manifestations of competitiveness. Socio-economic changes caused by globalization, internationalization and digitalisation of higher education, as well as the current demographic situation in Europe, including Latvia, raise the issue of the competitiveness of academic staff in a multi-level, multi-context and multifunctional higher education environment. The aim of the study is: based on the interdisciplinary approach, including transfer approach from economics and business sciences to educational sciences, to theoretically substantiate the competitiveness of university teachers in interaction with the multi-context and multi-level higher education environment, as well as the competitiveness of universities. The following research methods were used: study, analysis, and evaluation of scientific literature (theoretical research method); the reflection of own (the article authors') academic and scientific experience (empirical research method). The results of the research show that two tendencies can be distinguished in the substantiation of the competitiveness of university academic staff: 1) economists and business scientists, based on competition theories, use basic knowledge, findings in the development of the substantiation of competitiveness; 2) representatives of educational sciences and psychology develop a philosophical methodological base for research of specialists' competitiveness within their branches of science. In their research, the authors combine both of these approaches in conducting interdisciplinary research. Research results show that the competitiveness of the academic staff can be viewed in several aspects: 1) as a set of different characteristics (qualities) which are considered to be competitive advantages: 2) characteristics of competitive activities manifestations in the higher education environment. Three levels of the higher education environment are important in assessing the competitiveness of university teachers: the level of the local higher education environment (university level), the level of the national higher education environment and the level of the global higher education environment.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Soldatenkova, A. (2016). The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities. Journal of Informetrics, 10 ,596–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.013

Adam, E. (2020). ‘Governments base performance-based funding on global rankings indicators’: A global trend in higher education finance or a global rankings literature fiction? A comparative analysis of four performance-based funding programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 76, 102197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102197

Alavredov, A.P., & Alavredova T.P. (2019). Otrasleviye kriterii konkurentosposobnosti prepodovatel'a visshey shkoli. Sovremennaya konkurenciya, 13(3), 125 - 133. DOI: 10.24411/1993-7598-2019-10311

Aponte, C., & Jordan, R. (2020). Internationalization of the Curriculum with a Connectivism Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 412-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.092

Baranova, S. (2012). Augstskolu docētāju profesionālā pilnveide tālākizglitība. Promocijas darbs. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.

Bibik, I.A. (2014). Konkurentosposobniy prepodovatel vuza kak faktor sozdaniya nauchnogo obrazovatelnogo prostranstva dla stanovleniya konkurentosposobnih specialistov. Molodoy ucheniy, 10, 352 - 355. Dostupno: https://moluch.ru/archive/69/11927/

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. & Kliueva, O.A. (2013). To the Problem of Competitive Personality Concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 80, 363-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.580.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems Theory. In R.Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development, 6 (187-251). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Chen, Y.G., & Cheng, J.N. (2019). A study investigating teachers' competitiveness - Michael Porter's five forces model as theoretical basis. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 23(2), 1 - 18. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/A-study-investigating-teachers-competitiveness-michael-porters-five-forces-model-as-theoretical-basis-1528-2643-23-2-136.pdf

Chupkova, O.F. (2004). Formirovaniye konkurentosposobnosti lichnosti buduschego uchitel'a v processe ekspertno-analiticheskoy deyatel'nosti. Dissertaciya. Irkutsk: Irkutsskiy Gosudarstvenniy universitet.

CSP. (2021). Krities studējošo un uzņemto studentu skaits. Rīga: CSP. Pieejams; https://www.csb.gov.lv/lv/statistika/statistikas-temas/socialie-procesi/izglitiba/meklet-tema/2927-aktualais-augstakaja-izglitiba-2020-2021-m-g

CSP. (2020). Pieaug uzņemto, krītas studējošo studentu skaits. Rīga: CSP. Pieejams: https://www.csb.gov.lv/lv/statistika/statistikas-temas/socialie-procesi/izglitiba/meklet-tema/2663-aktualais-augstakaja-izglitiba-2019-2020-m-g

CSP. (2014). Samazinās studentu skaits Latvijas augstskolās. Rīga: CSP. Pieejams: https://www.csb.gov.lv/lv/1644-studentu-skaits-latvijas-augstskolas

Donina, I.A., & Sirova, Y.A. (2018). Konkurentosposobnost pedagoga kak tendenciya razvitiya sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Sankt-Peterburgskiy Obrazovatelniy Vestnik, 28 - 34. Dostupno: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/konkurentosposobnost-pedagoga-kak-tendentsiya-razvitiya-sovremennogo-obrazovaniya

Flunger, B., Trautwein, U., Nagangast, B., Lüdke, O., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2019). Using Multilevel Mixture Models in Educational Research: An Illustration with Homework Research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 89(1), 209 - 236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1652137

Grebennikova, V.M. & Rybkin, А.D. (2017). Analysis of the essential characteristics of the phenomenon of "competitiveness;" in the aspect of preparing a contemporary teacher. Education and Pedagogical Sciences, 9(2), 178 - 184. DOI: 10.17748/2075-9908-2017-9-5/2-178-183

Harchenko, L.N. (2014). Proektirovaniye programm podgotovki prepodovatelya visshey shkoli. Moskva: Litagent Direktmedia.

Holodceva, Y.L. (2006). Konkurentosposobnost'v sisteme raznourovnevyh harakteristik lichnosti specialistob social'noy sfery. Dissertaciya. Barnaul: BGPU.

Hsieh, Ch. Ch. (2020). Internationalization of higher education in the crucible: Linking national identity and policy in the age of globalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102245. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102245

Hubers, M. (2020). Paving the way for sustainable educational change: Reconceptualizing what it means to make educational changes that last. Teaching and Teacher Education, 93, 103083. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103083

Huitt, W. (2012). Educational Psychology Interactive: Systems model of human behavior. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/materials/sysmdlo.html

IZM. (2019). Pārskats par Latvijas augstāko izglītību 2018. gadā. Rīga: IZM. Retrieved from https://www.izm.gov.lv/sites/izm/files/augstakas_izglitibas_lv_parskats_20181.pdf

IZM. (2020). Statistika par augstāko izglītību. Rīga: IZM. Pieejams: https://www.izm.gov.lv/lv/statistika-par-augstako-izglitibu

Īriste, S. (2018). Prospective Managers’ of Hospitality Business Competitiveness Evaluation and Development promotion in the Dual Study Environment of Higher Education Institution. Summary of the Doctoral Thesis. Jelgava: LLU.

Katane, I. (2010). Competitiveness of Personality as a New Concept in Modern Education and Pedagogy Science. In L.Malinovska, & V.Osadcuks (Eds.), Engineering for Rural Development, 9 (327 – 334). Jelgava: LLU. Retrieved from http://tf.llu.lv/conference/proceedings2010/Papers/62_Katane_Irena.pdf.

Katane, I. (2011). Philosophic Methodological Bases for Evaluation of Educator's Competitiveness. In Z. Gaile (Ed.), Research for Rural Development, 2 (218 - 224). Jelgava: LLU.

Katane, I. (2007). Systemic Ecological Approach in Teacher Education: Ecological Didactic Model of Students' Pedagogical Practice. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 40-54. DOI: 10.2478/v10099-009-0004-7

Katane I., Baltusite R., & Katans E. (2017). Theoretical background for investigation and promotion of engineers competitiveness in education. In L.Malinovska, & V.Osadčuks (Eds.), Engineering for Rural Development, 16 (824- 831). Jelgava: LLU TF.

Katane, I., & Īriste, S. (2013). Students’ as Prospective Hospitality Specialists’ Competitiveness in Theory and Practice. In V.Ļubkina, & G.Marzano (Eds.), Society. Integration. Education, 1, Rēzekne, RA, 1, 119-129. DOI: 10.17770/sie2013vol1.158

Katane, I., & Kalniņa, I. (2010). Skolēnu konkurētspējas attīstība neformālās komercizglītības vidē. Jelgava: LLU. (in Latvian)

Katane I., & Katans E. (2016). Programming Specialist's Professional Development as Lifelong Self-Determination and Self-Organization Process. In V. Lubkina, S. Usca, & A. Zvaigzne (Eds.), Society. Integration. Education, 2, Rēzekne, AR, 535-548. DOI: 10.17770/sie2016vol2.1422

Katans E. (2019). Programmētāju profesionālās attīstības veicināšana mācīties spējīgā IT uzņēmumā zināšanu pārvaldības skatījumā. Jelgava: LLU.

Kozlova, D.V., & Maloshonok, N.G. (Eds.). (2016). Sovremenniy universitet mezhdu globalnimi vizovami i lokalnimi sadachami. Sbornik materialov VII Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii Rossiyskoy associacii issledovateley visshego obrazovaniya. Moskva: Izdatelskiy dom Visshey shkoli ekonomiki.

Lehnberg, D., & Hicks, J. (2018). A ‘glocalization’ approach to the internationalizing of crisis communication. Business Horizons, 61(3), 357-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.002

Lowden, K., Hall, St., Elliot, D. & Lewin, J. (2011). Employers' perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. London: University of Glasgow SCRE Centre and Edge Foundation.

Mahdi, O.R., Nassar, I.A., & Almsafir, M.K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013

Mahmudiono, T., Segalita, C., & Rosenkranz, R.R. (2019). Socio-Ecological Model of Correlates of Double Burden of Malnutrition in Developing Countries: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 1-23. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193730

Маrgolis, А.А. (2019). Ocenka kvalifikacii uchitel'a: obzor in analiz lucshih sarubezhnih praktik. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye, 24(1), 5-30. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2019240101.

Martincova, J., & Lukešová, M. (2015). Critical Thinking as a Tool for Managing Intercultural Conflicts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 1255 – 1264. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.239

Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-Gonzalez A.B. (2020). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for Higher Education Institutions’ sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.076

Mitina, L.M. (2003). Psihologiya razvitiya konkurentosposobnoy lichnosti. Moskva: MPSI.

Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657–683. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy033.

Parker, G. (2008). Capitol Investments: Marketibility of Political Skills. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Plugina, M.I. (2016). Determinatny professional'nogo stanovleniya prepodovatelya visshey shkoli v sovremennih usloviyah. Pedagogika i psihologiya, 1, 94- 104. Retrieved from http://journals.rudn.ru/psychology-pedagogics/article/view/13415/0

Rauhvargers, A. (2008). Pārrobežu (transnacionālā) izglītība: Definīcijas un labas prakses kodeksa pamatprincipi. Rīga: AIC. Ielādēts no http://www.aic.lv/ar/mag/aktualie/2_reize/4_3_transnac_2008.pdf

Sarfraz, I., Rajendran, D., Hewege, & C. Mohan, M.D. (2018). An exploration of global employability skills: A systematic research review. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 9(1), 63-88. DOI: 10.1504/IJWOE.2018.10012435

Salmi, J. (2009). The Challenge of Establishing the World Class Universities. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7865-6 Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/4288932/The_Challenge_of_Establishing_World_Class_Universities

Seginova, O., Grishina O., Zavyalova, N. & Skorobogatykh, I. (2015). Individualniy reyting prepodavateley kak marketingoviy instrument povisheniya konkurentosposobnosti vuza. Dostupno: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282877431

Shields, R. (2019). The sustainability of international higher education: Student mobility and global climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 594-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.29

Shirobokov, S. (2000). Ocenka kachestva podgotovki konkurentosposobnogo specialista v pedagogicheskom vuze. Dissertaciya. Omsk: Omskiy gosudarsctvenniy universitet.

Sklyar, Y.S. (2018). Konkurentosposobnost' prepodovatelya VUZa kak odno iz usloviy povisheniya kachestva obrazovatel'nih uslug. Innov: elektronniy nauchniy zhurnal. Retrieved from https://www.innov.ru/science/economy/konkurentosposobnost-prepodavatelya/?fbclid=IwAR2pzB5AlUCe_F37V0eo7hzOREc6TSADVa-VrEouf-83-nG_tid8hdJ0e2E

Sohach, A.Y., & Plugina, M.I. (2015). Konkurentosposobniy prepodovatel - konkurentosposobniy vipusnik vuza. Dostupno: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/konkurentosposobnyy-prepodavatel-konkurentosposobnyy-vypusknik-vuza

Sutz, J., & Arocena, R. (2021). Universities and social innovation for global sustainable development as seen from the south. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120399. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120399

Teichler, U. (2007). Studium und Berufschancen: Was macht den Unterschied aus? Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 29(4), 10 - 31.

Troskova, M., & Katane, I. (2020). Theoretical substantiation of the competitiveness of academic staff from the perspective of educationalo sciences. In Z.Gaile (Ed.), Research for Rural Development, 35 (274 - 281). Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. DOI: 10.22616/rrd.26.2020.040

Valitov, Sh.M.V. (2014).University brand as a modern way of winning competitive advantage. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 295 – 299. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.198

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Katane, I., & Troškova, M. (2021). COMPETITIVENESS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS IN THE MULTILEVEL ENVIRONMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 216-234. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol1.6387