THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PARADIGM SHIFT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN INDUSTRY AND DESIGN EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol2.636Keywords:
design, design thinking, visual art, classification, education, LatviaAbstract
Literature about design development and the current situation of the essence of trends in this field allow for the defining of design as an independent branch. Analysis of design and education regulations highlights the conflict between reality and gaps that exist in European statistical standards and International Standard Classification of Education. The purpose of this study is to explore complex problems in the field of design and design education which determines the need for Paradigm Shift for further development of these branches, as well as to present proposals for definitions of key terms of design and offer proposals for a new design education classification. This research will show why, and will mark how design needs to be classified individually, and not as a part of visual arts.Downloads
References
Ben-Eli, M. (2007). Design Science: A Framework for Change, available at:
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~shunter/Design_Science_Framework.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Bina, V., Chantepie, P., Deroin V., Frank, G., Kommel, K., Kotynek, J., Robines, J. (2012). European Statistical System Network on Culture, Final Report, pp.43- 44, 55, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/our-policy-development/documents/ess-net-report-oct2012.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Brown, T. (2008). Definitions of design thinking, available at: http://designthinking.ideo.com/?p=49 (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Brown, T. (2005). Strategy by Design, available at: http://www.fastcompany.com/ (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, Design Issues, Volume 8, No. 2, pp. 5-21, available at: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1511637?uid=3738496&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&ui d=4&sid=21102098883887 (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (1994). Developments in qualitative data analysis: an
introduction”, in Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp. 3-6
Commission of European communities (2009). Design as a driver of user-centred innovation, pp.9,58, available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/design_swd_sec501_en.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Cropley, A. (2002). Qualitative research methods. Riga, Zinātne.
Dancing Water (2009). 27 design definitions, available at: http://dancingwater.eu/2009/27-design-definitions/ (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Design Commission (2011). Restarting Britain: Design Education and Growth, pp. 48-49, available at: http://designmuseum.org/media/item/79241/4288/Design-Commission-Restarting-Britain-Design-Education-and-Growth.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Design Council (2008). Measuring return on investment in design (ROI), available at: http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/Insight/Research/How-businesses-use-design/Design-in-Britain-2008/Measuring-ROI-in-design/ (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Design 2020 Vision Commitee (2011). The Vision of the Design2020 Commitee, pp.11, available at: www.beda.org/index.php/resources/item/download/29 (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Design Singapore Council, Ministry of Information, Communications and Arts (2009). Strategic Blueprint of the DesignSingapore initiative, available at: http://www.mci.gov.sg/content/dam/mica_corp/Publications/MasterPlan/Download/Download1/ERCdesignsingapore.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
European Commission (6.10.2010). Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative. Innovations Union, pp. 19, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0546:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed: 17.02.2014)
European Design Leadership Board (2012). Design for growth and prosperity, pp.38;41, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/policy/design-creativity/ (accessed: 17.02.2014)
European Commission (26.9.2012). Promoting cultural and creative sectors for growth and jobs in the EU, pp.7, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/our-policy-development/documents/communication-sept2012.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Fuller R.B. (1963). Ideas and Integrities, The Macmillan Company; First Collier Edition.
Glaser, B.G. (2002). Constructivist Grounded Theory?, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol.3, No.3, Art.12, available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/825/1793 (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Goetzke, A. (2010). Creative Industries Convention 2010 Interview, available at:
http://www.vimeo.com/9402566 (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Hardt, M. (2006). Design the term design, available at: http://www.michael-hardt.com/PDF/lectures/design-definition.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Hassi, L., Laakso, M. (2011). Design Thinking in the Management discourse; defining the elements of the concept, available at: http://www.mindspace.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/HassiLaakso_2011_IPDMC.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Halinen, R, (2012). Information Systems Action design research method , available at: http://www.slideshare.net/RaimoHlinen/information-systems-research-method (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Irbite, A. (2013a). Traditions and innovations in Latvian design education, The 1st International Virtual Conference on Advanced Scientific Results, Proceedings in Scientific Conference, ISBN 978-80-554- 0726-5, pp. 230-236
Irbite, A. (2013b) The Evolution of Design during 20th-21st centuries, Art Tempus, Volume 1, pp. 16-28
Irbite, A. (2013c). Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Latvia, Creative Latvia, Design Strategy, Preamble (working paper)
Jackson, M.C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. University
of Hull, UK: John Wiley & Sons, available at: http://orgcomplexitynet.groupsite.com/uploads/files/x/000/02f/e18/Systems_Thinking_-_Creative_Holism_for_Managers.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam T., Perez, P., Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 16 (1), pp. 46, available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/ (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Kimbell, L.(2011). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I, Design and Culture, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp.285-306, available at: http://www.designstudiesforum.org/dsf/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/kimbell_wm.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Kuhn, T.S. (1962a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962b), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, University of Chicago Press.
Langan-Fox, J., Wirth, A., Code, S. Langfield-Smith, K., A. Wirth, A. (2001). Analyzing shared and team mental models. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 28, pp.99-112
Martin, R. (2009). Design Thinking: How Thinking Like a Designer Can Create Sustainable Advantage, Harward Business Publishing, available at: http://hbsp.harvard.edu/ (accessed: 17.02.2014) , available at: https://intranet.ebc.edu.mx/contenido/faculty/archivos/pensamiento_diseno_221111.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Mathijs, E., Mosselmans, B. (1999). Similarity or Difference : The Case for Interdisciplinarity between Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Art and Aesthetics, Interdisciplinarity: Documents, available at: http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~janzb/humanities/intdoc.htm (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Meta designers Open Network (2013).Working to Change the Paradigm, available at: http://metadesigners.org/Paradigm-Changing (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B. Bostrom, A., Atman, J C. (2002). Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, ISBN 0-521-80223-7,
pp. 22-31
Myerson, J. (2009). The Future Of Innovation Will Be People-centred, available at: http://thefutureofinnovation.org/contributions/view/681/the_future_of_innovation_will_be_people_centred (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Ozesmi, U., Ozesmi S.L. (2004). Ecological models based on people's knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognition mapping approach. Ecological Modeling, Volume 176, pp.43-64
Rittel, H., Webber M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences 4(1973), pp.160-163, available at: http://www.metu.edu.tr/~baykan/arch467/Rittel%2BWebber%2BDilemmas.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, in
Rittel, H.W., Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, Elsevier, pp. 155–169, available at:
http://www.uctc.net/mwebber/Rittel+Webber+Dilemmas+General_Theory_of_Planning.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
The Danish Government (2007). Design Denmark, available at: http://www.beda.org/index.php/resources/item/download/ (accessed: 17.02.2014)
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2013). Revision of the International Standart Classification of Education: Fields of Education and Training (ISCED-F), pp.7,73, available at: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-37c-fos-review-222729e.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2011). International Standard Classification of Education, pp.7, available at: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Visser, W. (2010). Simon: Design as a problem-solving activity, available at:
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/56/58/86/PDF/SimonDesignAsAProblemSolving.pdf
(accessed: 17.02.2014)
Wand, Y. (2009). A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept, Position Paper, available at: http://weatherhead.case.edu/events/requirements/Wand_DRW.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2014)
Quartz & Co; the Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority; the Danish Ministry of Culture ( 2011). Mapping of International Design Policies and Strategies for leading design schools and research institutions, pp.23, available at: http://erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/file/163743/mapping_international_design_policies_strategies.pdf
(accessed: 17.02.2014)
