HELPING PROFESSIONS FOR SOCIAL PROGRESS: PERSPECTIVES OF THE GRADUATE STUDENTS

Authors

  • Anita Pipere Daugavpils University, Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Kristīne Mārtinsone Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol7.6189

Keywords:

graduate students, helping professions, national planning documents, professional practice, social capital, social problems, thematic analysis

Abstract

The paper aims to explore how future practitioners in helping professions grasp the wider societal problems and represent their professional practice in terms of social progress. The inquiry illustrates the perspectives of students by triangulation between their understanding of main societal issues in Latvia in the context of national planning documents (NPDs), social capital (SC), and expectations about their future work. Data of 34 first-year graduate students were collected using the open questionnaire and analyzed employing inductive and deductive thematic analysis. The largest group of societal issues contained the socio-psychological problems followed by economic challenges. Only half of the answers concerning SC were in tune with the theoretical conceptualization of this term. The students’ views on societal issues and SC did not align well with the NPDs. The mentioned socio-psychological problems contained the issues of relationship and value aspects of SC, omitting the social networks. One-third of answers in terms of professional expectations were related to the development of SC, other answers focused on the demands of external entities, and the students’ features. The views of graduate students can become an important signpost for the development of graduate programs in times of global interest in core competencies for helping professions.

Supporting Agencies
The data collection for this study was supported by the National research program project ”Challenges and solutions for Latvia’s state and society in an international context (INTERFRAME-LV)”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acock, A. C., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1993). Social networks, marital status, and well-being. Social Networks, 15(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(93)90010-I

APA. (2020). Helping professions. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/helping-professions

Bardin, L.(2011). Análise de conteúdo.São Paulo: Edições 70.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Claridge, T. (2018). Dimensions of Social Capital - structural, cognitive, and relational. Social Capital Research and Training. Retrieved from: https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/structural-cognitive-relational-social-capital/

European University Institute (EUI). (2020). Eurobarometer: EU Public Opinion Surveys. EU.

Heineck, G., & Süssmuth, B. (2010). A different look at Lenin’s Legacy: Trust, risk, fairness and cooperativeness in the two Germanies. SOEPpaper, No. 345. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736587

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522

Howitt, D. (2011). Introduction to Qualitative Methods in Psychology. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

Kravale-Pauliņa, M., & Oļehnoviča, E. (2015). Human securitability: A participatory action research study involving novice teachers and youngsters. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,17(2) , 91-107.

Kruks, S. (2021). Uzticības, sadarbības un vienotības konceptu izpratne nacionālajā attīstības plānā 2021.–2027. gadam. Akadēmiskā dzīve, 56/2020/2021, 131-147.

Laboratory of Analytic and Strategic Studies. (2007). Latvia’s sustainable development strategy 2030: Background review. October. Retrieved from: http://participedia.net/sites/default/files/case-files/93_265_lias_pamatzinojums_eng.pdf

Latvia 2030. (2010). Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030: Latvia 2030. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia.

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

NDP 2020. (2012). National Development Plan of Latvia for 2014-2020. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia.

NDP 2027. (2020). National Development Plan of Latvia for 2021-2027. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia.

McKenzie, K., Whitley, R., & Weich, S. (2002). Social capital and mental health. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 181, 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.181.4.280

Miller, K., & Considine, J. (2009). Communication in the helping professions. In L. Frey & K. Cissna (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 405-428). New York: Routledge.

OECD. (2010). Social capital, human capital and health: What is the evidence? OECD: IRDES.

Project of NDP of Latvia for 2021 – 2027 (2019). Informatīvais ziņojums par priekšlikumu par Nacionālā attīstības plāna 2021.-2027. gadam mērķiem, prioritātēm un rīcības virzieniem, kā arī tā turpmāko izstrādes un sabiedriskās apspriešanas procesu. Retrieved from

tap.mk.gov.lv › doc › PKC_zin_NAP2027_06122018....

Ricou, M., Cordeiro, S. A., Franco, A., & Lobo, C. (2018). The identity of psychology. The Psychologist: Practice and Research Journal, 1(1), 15.

Sechi, G., & Šķilters, J. (2018). Social determinants of identity in communities: A social capital- and social categorization-based approach – findings from Latvia. Social Science Information, 57(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417741222

Song, L., & Lin, N. (2009). Social capital and health inequality: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000203

Song, L., Son, J., & Lin, N. (2010). Social capital and health. In W. Cockerham (Ed.), The New Companion to Medical Sociology (pp. 184-210). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Šuriņa, S., & Mārtinsone, K. (2020). Conceptualization of social capital in cross-sectional design studies: Rapid review of literature. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Society. Integration. Education”, Volume VII, May 22th -23th, 177-186. Rēzekne Technology Academy. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol7.4973

Turner, J. (2011). Social capital: measurement, dimensional interactions, and performance implications. All Dissertations. 762. Retrieved from https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/762

Webber, M. P., & Huxley, P. J. (2007). Measuring access to social capital: The validity and reliability of the Resource Generator-UK and its association with common mental disorder. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 65(3), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016

Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135

Zobena, A. (2007). In A. Zobena (eds.), Latvia Human Development Report 2006/2007: Human Capital. Riga: LU ASPRI.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Pipere, A., & Mārtinsone, K. (2021). HELPING PROFESSIONS FOR SOCIAL PROGRESS: PERSPECTIVES OF THE GRADUATE STUDENTS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 7, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol7.6189