NEW UKARINIAN SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL REFORMS AND PROFFESSIONAL MASTERSHIP OF THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol4.6138Keywords:
educational changes, physical education, professional mastership reform, teachersAbstract
The physical education teachers’ attitude towards reforming of education in Ukraine in terms of reform “New Ukrainian School” was analyzed in the article. The physical education specialists’ thoughts according these reforms’ impact on forming of professional mastership of teachers were analyzed in the article. The goal of the research is to provide comparable analysis of the support level of New Ukrainian School reforms that have impact on building professional improvement of physical education teachers.
In order to reach the goal such methods were applied as analysis and generalization of literature sources, teachers’ survey, based on questionnaire, its mathematic processing and comparative analysis. There were questioned 341 teachers from 7 Ukrainian regions with different qualification levels and pedagogical experience. All the respondents have given their permission in participation in the research.
The different levels of support of educational reforms among physical education teachers were found out. Innovations, in general, have higher than average and lower than average levels of support. The highest level of support has such innovation as freedom to choose or create educational program – 77,4%. However, even with high level of support, 41,9% of teachers think that they should teach pupils according to the only studying program, that is submitted by profile ministry. Only 6,5% of respondents are ready to create their own studying programs. However, 33,8% of teachers think the studying program should be adapted according to conditions of educational establishments. In order to build professional mastership, it is essential to imply different forms of qualification improvements (71,3%), distance studying during course retraining (59,7%), teachers’ certification (53,6%). The lowest level of support has decentralization in management of educational establishment (39,1%).
Downloads
References
Arefieva, L.P. (2010). Pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury do pozaklasnoi vykhovnoi roboty v starshii shkoli. Kandydatska dysertatsiia. Natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet im. M.P.Drahomanova, Kyiv.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Azhyppo, O. Yu. (2013). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury do profesiinoi diialnosti u zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladakh. Doktorska dysertatsiia. Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet im. H.S.Skovorody, Kharkiv.
Deminska, L. O. (2014). Aksiolohichni zasady profesiino-pedahohichnoi pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoho vykhovannia. Doktorska dysertatsiia. Kyivskyi universytet im. Borysa Hrinchenka, Kyiv.
Dezimone, L.M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Education Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Fedorchuk, E., Konkova, T., Fedorchuk, V., & Zaremba V. (2006). Osnovy pedahohichnoi maisternosti. Kamianets-Podilskyi: Vydavets Zvoleiko D.
Konukman, F. (2015). Reform in Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE): A Critical Inquiry for the Future. International journal of Science Culture and Sport, 3(4), 6–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS449
Kougioumtzis, K., Patriksson, G., & Strahlman, O. (2011). Physical education teachers’ professionalization: A review of occupational power and professional control. European Physical Education Review, 17(1), 111–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X11402266
Kurnyshev, Yu.A. Pedahohichni umovy profesiinoho samorozvytku maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury. Kandydatska dysertatsiia. Natsionalnoi akademii pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy, Kyiv.
Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform, systemic reform: Perspectives on personalizing education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
Matviichuk, T.F. (2015a). Osoblyvosti formuvannia pedahohichnoi maisternosti vchyteliv fizychnoi kultury. Naukovyi chasopys NPU im. M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 15: Naukovo-pedahohichni problemy fizychnoi kultury: (fizychna kultura i sport), 5 (K) 61, 163–167.
Matviichuk, T. F. (2015b). Formuvannia pedahohichnoi maisternosti maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoho vykhovannia u protsesi profesiinoi pidhotovky. Kandydatska dysertatsiia. Lvivskyi naukovo-praktychnyi tsentr instytutu profesiino-tekhnichnoi osvity, Lviv.
Moiseiev, S.O. (2017). Suchasni trendy v semantychnomu prostori konstruktu «pedahohichna maisternist». Pedahohichnyi almanakh, 35, 165–172.
Moiseiev, S.O. (2018). Rozvytok pedahohichnoi maisternosti vchytelia fizychnoi kultury u vymirakh fakhovykh konkursiv. Kherson: Akademiia neperervnoi osvity.
Moskalenko, N., Bodnar, I., Sorokolit, N., Rymar, O. & Solovey, A. (2020). Analysis of Attitudes to educational reforms in Ukraine of Physical Education teachers and primary education teachers. Society. Integration. Education: proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. May 22th–23th, 2, 119–129. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol2.4846
Omelchuk, O. V. (2014). Formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury u protsesi vyvchennia pryrodnycho-naukovykh dystsyplin. Kandydatska dysertatsiia. Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy, Instytut literatury im. T. H. Shevchenka, Kyiv.
Papucha, V. M. (2010). Formuvannia pedahohichnoi maisternosti maibutnoho vchytelia fizychnoho vykhovannia v protsesi fakhovoi pidhotovky. Kandydatska dysertatsiia. Klasychnyi pryvatnyi universytet, Zaporizhzhia.
Penkovets, D.V. (2013). Etapy formuvannia profesiinoi maisternosti u maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu: Pedahohichni nauky, 110, 261–263.
Radkevych, V. O. (2012). Profesiina kompetentnist – skladova profesiinoi kultury. Pedahohichna i psykholohichna nauky v Ukraini: Profesiina osvita i osvita doroslykh. Kyiv: Ped. dumka, 63–74.
Savchenko, V.A. (2011). Formuvannia profesiinoi maisternosti vchyteliv fizychnoi kultury v systemi pisliadyplomnoi pedahohichnoi osvity. Naukovyi chasopys NPU im. M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 16: Tvorcha osobystist uchytelia: problemy teorii i praktyky, 14, 317–321.
Sorokolit N., Rymar O. & Bodnarchuk O. (2020). Porivnialnyi analiz stavlennia uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury do osvitnikh reform v zakladakh zahalnoi serednoi osvity. Fizychne vykhovannia, sport ta ozdorovcha kultura v suchasnomu suspilstvi, 2(50), 20–25. DOI :https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2020-20-25
Sorokolit, N. (2018). Stavlennia uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury do osvitnikh novovveden reformy "Nova ukrainska shkola". Sportyvna nauka Ukrainy, 6(88), 53–59. Retrieved from http://sportscience.ldufk.edu.ua/index.php/snu/article/view/852/821
Sorokolit, N., Shyyan. O., Lukjanchenko, M., & Turchyk, I. (2017). Improverment of 5–9th Grades Schoolchildren Physical Education in Ukraine by Using Variable Modules Curriculum. Journal of physical education and sport, 17 (4), 2110–2115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.s4215
Stepanchenko, N.I. (2017). Systema profesiinoi pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoho vykhovannia u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh. Doktorska dysertatsiia. Vinnytskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet im. M. Kotsiubynskoho, Vinnytsia.
Tannehill, D., Demirhan, G., Chaplova, P., & Avsar, Z. (2021). Continuing professional development for physical education teachers in Europe. European Physical Education Review, 27(1), 1150–1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20931531
Veselovskyi, A., Redchyts, V. & Ilchyshyn, I. (2016). Okremi napriamy profesiinoi pidhotovky fakhivtsia fizychnoi kultury u svitli vymoh sohodennia. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk, 15, 277–283.
Vindjuk, A. V. (2013). Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv fizychnoi kultury do formuvannia v uchniv uminnia samostiino vykonuvaty fizychni vpravy. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Berdianskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho instytutu, 2, 20–26.
Yurieva, L., Sava, M., & Yavorskyi, Yu. (2009). Osoblyvosti profesiinoi maisternosti maibutnoho fakhivtsia fizychnoi kultury. Fizychne vykhovannia, sport i kultura zdorovia u suchasnomu suspilstvi, 3, 38–41.
