Relation between Moral Competence and Religiosity: Cognitive and Intuitive Aspects

Ingrīda Trups-Kalne; Ģirts Dimdiņš

doi:10.17770/sie2013vol2.604

Authors

Ingrīda Trups-Kalne
Ģirts Dimdiņš

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol2.604

Keywords:

moral competence, moral foundation, religiosity

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine whether moral foundations mediate the negative relation between moral competence and orthodox/conservative religiosity. The participants (N = 361, aged 16 to 74) completed the Moral Judgment Test (Lind, 1978, 2008), the 30-Item Full Version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (Graham, Haidt & Nosek, 2008), and Huber's (Huber, 2004) Religion’s Centrality Scale. Mediation analysis revealed that the ‘binding’ moral foundations of in-group loyalty, respect for authority, and purity mediate the negative relation between moral competence and orthodox religiosity. These results are in line with Lind’s theoretical prediction that if individuals have more criteria to consider when making moral judgment, it may hamper their performance on moral competence measures, which are typically based on the individual foundations of harm avoidance and justice. The study contributes to understanding differences in social cognition between liberal and conservative religiosity.

References

Allport, G. W. & Ross, J.M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Batson, C.D. (1976). Latent aspects of “From Jerusalem to Jericho.” In M.P.Golden (Ed.), The research experience. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.

Cottone, J., Drucker, P. & Javier, R.A. (2007). Predictors of moral reasoning: Components of executive functioning and aspects of religiosity. Journal for the scientific study of religion. 46(1), 37-53.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.

Deka, N., & Broota, K.D. (1988). Relation between level of religiosity and principled moral judgment among four religious communities in India. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 4, 151-156.

Duriez, B., & Soenens, B. (2006). Religiosity, moral attitudes and moral competence: A critical investigation of the religiosity – morality relation. International Journal of Behavioral Development 30 (1), 76 – 83.

Ernsberger, D.J., & Manaster, G.J. (1981). Moral development, intrinsic/extrinsic religious orientation and denominational teachings. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 104, 23–41.

Fernhout, H. & Boyd, D. (1985). Faith in autonomy: Development in Kohlberg's perspectives in religion and morality. Religious Education, 80, 287-307.

Fowler, J.W. (1981). Stages of faith. The Psychology of human development and the quest of meaning. San Francisco Harper u. Row.

Getz, I. (1984). The relation of moral reasoning and religion: A review of the literature. Counseling ans Value, 28(3), 94-116.

Glock, C.Y. & Stark R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Glock, C.Y. (1962). On the study of religious commitment. Religious Education Research Supplement, 57(4), 98 – 110.

Glover, R.J. (1997). Relationship in moral reasoning and religion among members of conservative, moderate and liberal religious groups. The journal of social psychology 137(2), 247-254.

Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150.

Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. (2008). Moral Foundations Questionnaire, MFQ 30 revised in July 2008. Extracted 8.12.2008. from http://faculty.virginia.edu/haidtlab/mft/index.php?t=questionnaires

Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B. A., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.

Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.

Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately repaired intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, Fall, 55-66.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108, 814-834.

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98-116.

Huber, S. (2004). Zentralität und Inhalt. Eine Synthese ders Messmodelle von Allport und Glock. In Zwingmann & Moosburger (Eds.) Religiosität: Messvervaren un Studien zu Gesundheit und Lebensbewältigung. Neue Beiträge zur Religionspsychologie. (pp. 79 – 105). Münster: Waxmann.

Kohlberg, L. (1968/1995). Moralische Entwicklung. (oriģinālraksts: Moral Development. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (pp. 483 - 494). NewYork: Crowell, Collier &Macmillan). Die Psychologie der Moralentwicklung. (S. 7– 41). Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp Verlag.

Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development, Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

Kunzman, R. (2003). Religion, ethics and the implications for moral education: a critique of Nucci`s “Morality and Religious Rules”. Journal of moral education, 32(3), 251-261.

Lind, G. (1978). Der 'Moralisches-Urteil-Test' (m-u-t). Anleitung zur Anwendung und Weiterentwicklung des Tests. In L.H. Eckensberger, Ed., Entwicklung des moralischen Urteils - Theorie, Methoden, Praxis. Saarbrücken. University print, pp. 337-358.

Lind, G. (2002). Ist Moral lehrbar? Ergebnisse der modernen moralpsyhologischen Forschung. Berlin: Logos Verlag.

Lind, G. (2003a). Does Religion Foster or Hamper Morality and Democracy? Extracted 25.03. 2007. from http://www.uni-konstanz.de/ag-moral/pdf/Lind-2003_religionmorality-KURZ.pdf

Lind, G. (2003b). Moral ist lehrbar. Handbuch zur Theorie und Praxis der moralischen und demokratischen Bildung [Morality can be taught. Handbook on theory and practice of moral and democratic education]. München: Oldenbuorg Schulbuchverlag GmbH.

Lind, G. (2008). The meaning and measurement of moral judgment competence revisited – A dual-aspect model. In: D. Fasko, W. Willis (Eds.), Contemporary Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives on Moral Development and Education (pp. 185-220). Cresskill. NJ: Hampton Press.

Lupu, I. (2009). Die Bedeutung von Bildung und Religiosität für die Entwicklung moralischer Urteilsfähigkeit. Dissertation, University of Konstanz, Department of Psychology. Iegūts 2009. gada 28. janvārī no http://kops.ub.unikonstanz.de/bitstream/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-95865/Diss_Lupu.pdf?sequence=1

Maclean, A.M., Walker, L.J. & Matsuba, M. K. (2004). Transcendence and the moral self: Identity integration, religion, and moral life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 43(3), 429-437.

Malzubris, G. (2002). Morālās spriešanas un emocionālās inteliģences saistība. LU Pedagoģijas un psiholoģijas fakultāte. Nepublicēts bakalaura darbs.

Navarez, D., Getz, I., Rest, J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Individual moral judgment and cultural ideologies. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 35. no. 2, 478-488.

Nucci, P.L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge University Press.

Oser, F. & Gmünder, P. (1984). Der Mensch – Stufen seiner religiösen Entwicklung. Ein strukturgenetischer Ansatz. Zürich/Köln.

Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.

Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feelings?: The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 355-375.

Rudzīte, I. (2010). Reliģiozitātes un depresijas saistība jauniešiem. Latvijas Universitāte, Pedagoģijas, psiholoģijas un mākslas fakultāte, nepublicēts bakalaura darbs.

Saeidi-Parvaneh, S. (2011). Moral, Bildung und Religion im Iran. Zur Bedeutung universitärer Bildung für die Entwicklung moralischer Urteils- und Diskursfähigkeit in einem religiös geprägten Land. University of Konstanz: Dissertation. Iegūts 2012. gada 15. aprīlī no http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-

/Soudabeh_Saeidi_Dissertation.pdf?sequence=1

Sapp, G.L. & Gladding, S.T. (1989). Correlates of religious orientation, religiosity,and moral judgment. Counseling and Values. 33, 140-145.

Shafir & LeBoeuf (2004). Context and Conflict in Multiattribute Choice. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making Eds. D.J. Koehler, N. Harvey (pp. 342 - 357), Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Siegmund, U. (1979). Das moralisches Urteilsniveau von religiösen Studentengruppen In G. Lind (Ed.), Moralisches Entwicklung und Soziale Umwelt (pp. 13-21). Zentrum 1 Bildungsforschung. Mimeo: University of Konstanz.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–31.

Wahrman, I. (1981). The relationship between dogmatism, religious affiliation and moral judgment development. The Journal of Psychology, 108, 151-154.

Wakenhut, R. (1981). Sozialisationsforschung und Lebenskundlicher Unterricht [Socializācijas pētījumi un dzīvesziņas mācības]. Dokumentation zur katholischen Militärseelsorge, 8, 48–71.

Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wulf, D.M. (1991). Psychology of religion: classic and contemporary views. New York: Wiley & Sons.