Organization of Pedagogical Practice for Facilitation of Students’ Creative Professional Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2012vol1.59Keywords:
cooperation, creative professional activity, didactical model, professional practice, reflection, self-dependent activityAbstract
Development of teacher’s creative individuality is a dynamic process of personality transformation and self-development. Aim of the article is to determine the possibilities to facilitate students’ self-dependent professional activities as a condition of creativity. Within the framework of the article, the results of the experts’ judgment method are analyzed using content analysis. Experts’ assessment confirms the correspondence of the model to the consummation of student's individual development and learning objectives. Students' creative professional activity is contributed by facilitation of student-oriented and social-oriented studies activity; provision of the action approach; ensuring the unity of theory and practice between the study courses and pedagogical practice as well as in the content of each one.
References
Beļickis, I. (2000). Vērtīborientēta mācību stunda. Rīga: RaKa, 278 lpp.
Colton, A.B. & Sparks – Langer, G.M. (1993). A Conceptual Framework to Guide the Development of Tacher Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), p. 45 – 54.
Gudjons, H. (2007). Pedagoģijas pamatatziņas. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC, 394 lpp.
LaBoskey, V.K. (1995). A Conceptual Framework for Reflection in Preservice Teacher Education. In J.Calderhead, P.Gates (eds.), Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development. Routledge Falmer, p. 23 – 38.
McAlpine, L. & Weston, C. (2002). Reflection: improving teaching and students learning. In N.Hativa, P.Goodyear (eds.), Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 59 – 77.
Millan, J. (2004). Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 234 p.
Moon, J.A. (2002). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. London: Kogan Page, 371 p.
Strode, A. (2010). Studentu patstāvīga profesionālā darbība pedagoģiskajā praksē. Rēzekne: RA izdevniecība, 186 lpp.
Коточитова, Е.В. (2001). Психологические особенности творческого педагогического мышления. Ярославль: Изд–во ЯрГУ, 24 c.
Кузьмина, Н.В. (1990). Профессионализм личности преподователя и мастера производственного обучения. Москва: Высшая школа, 167 с.
Сластенин, В.А., Исаев, И.Ф., Шиянов, Е.Н. (2002). Педагогика. Москва: АСАОЕМА, 483 с.
Сластенин, В.А., Подымова, Л.С. (1997). Педагогика: инновационная деятельность. Москва: ИЧП ”Издательство Магистр”, 224 с.
Слободчиков, В.И., Исаев, Е.И. (1997). Психология человека: введение в психологию субъективности. Учеб. пособие для вузов. Москва: Школа-Пресс, 384 с.
Rauhvargers, A. (2005). Veidojot Kvalifikāciju ietvarstruktūru Latvijas augstākajai izglītībai. Skatīts 05.05.2009, no: http://www.aic.lv/bolona/Latvija/Atsev_prez/LV_FRame24012005.pdf