THE FLEXIBILITY OF CURRICULUM FOR PERSONALISED LEARNING

Authors

  • Lina Kaminskiene Vytautas Magnus University (LT)
  • Maria Jose DeUrraza Vytautas Magnus University (LT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.5009

Keywords:

personalised learning, learner-centred pedagogy, curriculum

Abstract

The paper discusses two main approaches to personalised learning through humanistic and functionalist approaches and tries to identify the shared areas. The paper argues that these areas are related to the development of a flexible curriculum and are focused on learner's needs and potentials, learner's ownership of the learning process, recognition of learner’s pace and assessing personal progress. The paper is based on literature review, trying to systemise current theoretical and practical approaches to personalised learning.

 

 

References

Bernardo, J., Javaloyes, J.J., Calderero, J.F., Muñoz, M.M. & Castellanos, A. (2011). Educación personalizada: principios, técnicas y recursos. Madrid: Síntesis.

Campbell, R. J., Robinson, W., Neelands, J., Hewston, R. & Mazzoli, L. (2010). Personalised learning: ambiguities in theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 135-154.

Camps-Bansell, J. (2018). Educación personalizada y diferenciada. Madrid: Digital Reasons.

López, F.C. (2004). La comunicación entre el profesor-tutor y los alumnos. Reflexiones sobre la tutoría en los centros estatales españoles. ESE: Estudios Sobre Educación, 7, 129-142.

Chocarro, E., González-Torres, M. & Sobrino, Á. (2007). Nuevas orientaciones en la formación del profesorado para una enseñanza centrada en la promoción del aprendizaje autorregulado de los alumnos. Estudios sobre Educación, 12. DOI:10.17770/sie2019vol2.3708

Hartley, D. (2008). Education, markets and the pedagogy of personalisation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(4), 365-381.

International Bureau of Education. Training Tools for Curriculum Development (2017), Training Tools for Curriculum Development: Personalized Learning. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000250057/PDF/250057eng.pdf.multi.page=1andzoom=auto,-16,842.

Kaminskienė, L., Khetsuriani, N. (2019). Co-creation of learning as an engaging practice. Society, Integration, Education: proceedings of the international scientific conference. Rēzekne: Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija, 2, 191-199.

Karmeshu, Raman, R. & Nedungadi, P. (2012). Modelling diffusion of a personalized learning framework. Education Tech Research Dew, 60, 585-600.

Mincu, M.E. (2012a). Mapping meanings of personalisation. In Personalisation of Education in Contexts. Brill Sense. DOI:10.2753/EUE1056-4934410103

Mincu, M.E. (2012b). Editorial Introduction. In Personalisation of Education in Contexts: Policy critique and theories of personal improvement. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI:10.2753/EUE1056-4934410103

Mounier, E. (1989). Personalism. University of Notre Dame Press.

Netcoh, S. (2017). Balancing freedom and limitations: A case study of choise provision in a personalized learning class. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 383-392. Retrieved from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.vdu.lt:2443/science/article/pii/S0742051X16302748.

Peters, R.S. (1977). Education and the Education of Teachers. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Watkins, C. (2012). Personalisation and the Classroom Context. In Personalisation of Education in Contexts (pp.1-18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Zmuda, A., Curtis, G. & Ullman, D. (2015). Learning personalized. The Evolution of the Contemporary Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Kaminskiene, L., & DeUrraza, M. J. (2020). THE FLEXIBILITY OF CURRICULUM FOR PERSONALISED LEARNING. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.5009