INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY AS STRENGHT IN THE PROCESSES OF THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4928Keywords:
Intellectual humility, intellectual virtue, forming knowledge, developing knowledgeAbstract
The aim of the research: To describe the intellectual humility of a teacher as strength in the processes of forming and developing knowledge. Intellectual virtues presuppose the objective of deep, factual perception with a possibility to make mistakes. A lot of pedagogues lack the activities important for virtues without dependence on mood or similar supporting means (the total level of virtue). A teacher who distinguishes with intellectual humility, who belongs to the virtues of the first range (the initiation of learning process and its guiding towards the right direction) and has connection with other intellectual virtues, aims for coordinated learning relationship where the sense of equality is present, as well as broaden perspective, distinguishes with flexibility while re-considering convictions, fear which is felt by an intellectually humble person when he/she misses information or something is not understood. An intellectually humble teacher, developing his/her knowledge, distinguishes with the constant pursuit for development, ability to self-evaluate strengths and weaknesses, seeing relationship with others as perspective for development The definition of intellectual humility is usually related with the recognition that your convictions and opinions can be wrong. This virtue is concerned with the strengths of a teacher. Being an intellectually humble person opens possibilities to the independence of a learner while forming or developing knowledge and understanding. In this process the potential of colleagues is recognized, strong and weak points are firmly pointed out, intellectual arrogance is avoided. This presupposes more possibilities for the change of learning both to a learner and the one dependant on him/her.
References
Baehr, J. (2016). Is intellectual character growth a realistic educational aim? Journal of Moral Education. Vol 45, No. 2, 117-131.
Bendrojo ugdymo mokyklų veiklos kokybė. Nacionalinės mokyklų vertinimo agentūros metinis pranešimas 2015 (5).
Cowley, C. (2017). Education, Despair and Morality. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 51, No. 1, 298-309.
Dudaitė, J., & Prakapas, R. (2016). Lietuvos mokytojų, dirbančių su „Activinspire” interaktyviąja sistema, patirtys organizuojant pamokos darbą. Socialinis darbas. 14(2), 199-209.
Freire, P. (2000). Kritinės sąmonės ugdymas. Vilnius: Tyto Alba.
Friedman, T. (2014). How to get a job at Google. New York Times, February 22. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/opinion/sunday/friedman-how-to-get-a-job-at-google.html.
Gruppen, L.D. (2014). Humility and respect: core values in medical education. Medical Education. 48, 53-58.
Lietuva. Švietimas šalyje ir regionuose. Mokinių pasiekimai (2016). Vilnius: Švietimo aprūpinimo centras.
Marazaitė, I., & Kociūnas, R. (1998). Psichologinė nuolankumo analizė. Psichologija, 18, 65-81.
Ortwein, M.,J. (2015). The Regulation of Understanding throgh Intellectual Virtue. Jornal of Thought. 71-85.
Pagrindiniai suaugusiųjų gebėjimai. PIAAC tyrimo rezultatai. Prieiga per internetą: https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/
Payette, P., & Barnes B. (2018). Coaching for Intellectual Humility and Intellectual Perseverance. The National Teaching & Learning Forum. Vol 27, No. 3, 4-6.
Priest, M. (2017). Intellectual Humility: an interpersonal theory. Ergo. Vol. 4, No. 16, 463-480.
Rimkutė, A. (2006). Religijos terminijos tvarkyba Draugijoje. Terminologija.
Salloum, S. (2017). The pace of practical wisdom in science education: what can be learned from Aristotelian ethics and a virtue-based theory of knowledge. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 12: 355-367.
Taylor, R., & M. (2016). Open-mindedness: an Intellectual Virtue in Pursuit of Knowledge and Understanding. Educational theory. Vol. 66, No. 5, 599-618.
Truscot, S.D., Kearney, M.A., Davis, D.E., & Roach, A.T. (2017). Intellectual Humility and Morality as Consultee-Centeed Consultation Epistemologies. Journal of Educational and psychological consultation. Vol. 27, No. 1, 26-142.
Vasiliauskaitė, A. (2016). Sielovados principai Šv. Benedikto regulos tekste. Soter: religijos mokslo žurnalas.