CRITERIA AND INDICATORS OF FORMATION OF HUMANISTIC AND VALUE ATTITUDE OF PRIMARY SCHOOLCHILDREN TOWARDS THEMSELVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4887Keywords:
humanistic and value attitude, levels of formation of humanistic and value attitude, pedagogical conditions, primary schoolchildrenAbstract
Scientific works show that it is necessary to solve the humans problem of the formation of values and value attitude. Early school age is a period of active development of ideological orientations, interests, behavioral strategies, assessments and self-evaluation. The purpose of the study lay in developing and testing the diagnostic tools of the formation of a humanistic and value attitude of the schoolchildren towards themselves and in determining on this basis the appropriate pedagogical conditions for improving the investigated quality. The primary schoolchildren (n = 317, age 8-9) took part in the study. The results of the preliminary stage of the pedagogical experiment revealed the need to raise the level of humanistic and value attitude of children (low level – 61,5%, average level – 30,9%, high level – 7,6%). Primary school teachers are important organizers of the educational process with students, but they do not use enough methods that are effective in solving this research problem. In order to humanize the environment in primary school, authors suggest using game exercises, conversations, elements of training, including children in various types of socially significant activities, creating axiological educational situations, etc.
References
Boninger, D.S., Krosnick, J.A., & Berent, M.K. (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 61-80.
Demchenko, O., Kit, G., Holiuk, O., & Rodiuk N. (2018). Development of future teachers’ subjectivity in the context of preparation for working with gifted children. Society. Integration. Education, II, 507-519. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3167
Goluk, O., Gaydukevich, A., Pakhal’chuk, N., Karuk, I., & Kolesnik, K. (2018). Education of children’s self-esteem as a projection of moral and humanistic values. Science Review, 1(8), 5, 13-17.
Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J.A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
Homer, P.M., & Kahle, L.R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 638-646.
Lapshyna, I., & Lyubchak, L. (2019). Using the Technology of Collective Game Communication in the Process of Forming the Diamonological Competency of Primary School Pupils. Society. Integration. Education, II, 267-279. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol2.3995
Moore, J.S.B., & Smith, M. (2018). Children’s levels of contingent self-esteem and social and emotional outcomes. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(2), 113-130.
Neff, K. (2003). Self and identity. Taylor & Francis, 2, 85-101.
Nelson, J.R., Hall, B.S., Anderson, J.L., Birtles, C., & Hemming, L. (2017). Self-compassion as self-care: a simple and effective tool for counselor educators and counseling students. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 12, 1-13.
Onur, A., Sahina, E., & Tekkaya, C. (2012). An investigation on value orientations, attitudes and concern towards the environment: the case of Turkish junior school students. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 271-297.
Shchetinіna, A.M. (2000). Diagnosis of social development of a child. Velikiy Novgorod: NOVGU іm. Yaroslava Mudrogo.
Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(4), 392-1404.
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R.W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434-447.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
