Characteristics of Personal Value-Meaning Systems of Latvian Youths in 1998, 2005, 2010 and 2015: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol3.476Keywords:
attainability of value, discrepancy between importance and attainability of value, importance of value, personal value-meaning system, valuesAbstract
Research of personal values is one of the most important tasks in the context of social and economic changes of the society. The purpose of this research was to compare the values and the level of disintegration of personal value-meaning systems of Latvian youths in different periods of socio-economic development of Latvian society. The research was conducted in 1998 and repeated in 2005, 2010 and in 2015. All participants were students of 11th or 12th grade. To provide a measure of value-meaning systems the M. Rokeach technique modified by E.B. Fantalova was used. The results revealed that there were differences in ratings of importance and attainability of values as well as in levels of discrepancy between importance and attainability of values of Latvian youths in different periods of socio-economic development of Latvian society.
Downloads
References
Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). A study of values. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Austruma, S. (2012). Jauniešu vērtības patērētājsabiedrībā Latvijā. Promocijas darba kopsavilkums. Rēzekne: Rēzeknes Augstskola.
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). A hierarchical structure of basic human values in a third-order confirmatory factor analysis. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73(3), 177-182.
Eņģele, I. (2015). Indivīda vērtības. No: K. Mārtinsone, A. Miltuze (Red.), Psiholoģija. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC, 99-107.lpp.
Izglītības un zinātnes ministrija (2013). Jauniešu iespēju, attieksmju un vērtību pētījums. Pieejams: http://izm.izm.gov.lv/upload_file/jaunatne/IZM_EKCYP_Jauniesu_aptauja_Excolo_2013.pdf.
Jirgena, S. (1999). Jauniešu pašizjūta un adiktīvas uzvedības izvēle. Promocijas darbs. Rīga: LU.
Jirgena S., Mārtinsone K. (2007). Vērtību hierarhija: jauniešu salīdzinošais vērtējums 1998. un 2005.gadā. Sabiedrība un kultūra. Rakstu krājums IX. A.Medveckis (Sast.). Liepāja: LiePA, 2007, 112-119. lpp.
Karpova, Ā. (1994). Personība un individuālais stils. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.
Karvonen, S., Young, R., West, P., & Rahkonen, O. (2012). Value orientations among late modern youth – a cross-cultural study. Journal of Youth Studies, 15 (1), 33-52.
Lan, J. (2009). The impact of globalization on the values of contemporary Chinese youth, Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 12-16.
Likitapiwat, T., Sereetrakul, W., & Wichadee, S. (2015). Examining materialistic values of university students in Thailand. International Journal of Psychological Research, 8 (1), 109-118.
Koroļeva I., Rungule R., Sebre S., Trapenciere I. (1999). Latvijas jaunatnes socioloģisks portrets. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts.
Lūse, D. (2001). Individuālisma un kolektīvisma vērtību orientācijas Latvijas jauniešu vidū. IT laikmets: jaunatne un sociālās izmaiņas. Rīga: FSI, VJIC, 249-255.lpp.
Maercker, A., Zhang, X.C., Gao, Z., Kochetkov, Y., Lu, S., Sang, Z., Yang, S., Schneider, S., Margraf, J. (2015). Personal value orientations as mediated predictors of mental health: A three-culture study of Chinese, Russian, and German university students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15, 8-17
Meral, C. (2000). Change in value orientations of Turkish youth from 1989 to 1995. Journal of Psychology, 134 (3), 297-305.
Petrov, A.V. (2008). The value preferences of young people. Russian Education and Society, 50 (9), 53–67.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Salikhova, N. (2015a). The comparison of substantial and dynamic parameters personal value-meaning systems of American and Russian university students, Review of European Studies, 7 (4), 117-123.
Salikhova, N. (2015b). The correlation of importance and attainability disparity in the personality value system with the meaningfulness of life. Review of European Studies, 7, (1), 141-147.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Schwartz, S.H. & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
Schwartz, S. H. & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.
Šteinberga, A., Tunne, I., (1999). Jauniešu pašizjūta un vērtības. Rīga: RaKa.
Tunne, I. (1997). Studējošās jaunatnes vērtību orientācija Latvijā. Nepublicēta disertāija. Rīga: LU.
Фанталова Е.Б. (2001). Диагностика и психотерапия внутреннего конфликта. Самара: БАХРАХ-М.
