Autonomous English Acquisition in Blended E-Studies for Adults for Sustainable Development: Implementation of the Synergetic System Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol4.409Keywords:
autonomous English acquisition, methodological factors, synegetic system modelAbstract
Researchers’ attention has moved from solving a problem to united methodology for solving different problems. It resulted in paradigm shift in the science and using system approach in social researches. The topicality of „Autonomous English acquisition in blended e-studies for adults for sustainable development”follows from results of the previous part of the research. They show that vertical hierarchy of responsibility has sticked together and learners’ interest towards methodological factors increased in virtual English acquisition. Next research problem is how to facilitate transformation of horisontal values from directed English acquisition to self-organised its acquisition in virtual learning environment. Hypothetically, it is assumed that there are sensitive factors, facilitation of which can call a resonance and transformation of other factors according to synergetic system model for facilitation the transformation of values in blended e-studies in adult nonformal education. The article presents reinterpretation of the results of the active research according to system approach of the whole research. The aim - to work out recommendations for implementation of the research model is reached in it.
References
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: foundations, development, applications. Worchester: Clark University Press.
Bojāre I. (2013). Empirical checking of criteria of the self-directed English acquisition readiness scale in blended e-studies for adults: qualitative research. Reorientation of teacher education towards sustainability through theory and practice: Proceedings of the 10th International JTEFS/BBCC conference Sustainable development. Culture. Education. (Ed. U.Harkonen). Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Reports and Studies in Education, Humanities, and Theology, No 7, pp. 233-243. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
Bojāre, I. (2014). Autonomous English acquisition in blended e-studies for adults for sustainable development: Active Research.= Autonoma angļu valodas apguve jaukta veida e-studijās pieaugušajiem ilgtspējīgai attīstībai: Darbības pētījums. Sabiedrība, integrācija, izglītība: Starptaut. zinātn. konfer. mater. 2014.g. 23.-24.maijs. 2.daļa, 291.-299.lpp. = Society, integration, education; proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Vol. 2, pp. 291-299. Rēzekne: Rēzeknes Augstskola, 2014. ISSN 1691-5887
Bojāre, I., Ignatjeva, S. (2014). Autonomous English acquisition in blended e-studies for adults for sustainable development: Quantitative research. Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP): Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference, pp. 42-49. Jelgava: The Latvia University of Agriculture, Institute of Education and Home Economics.
Fulans, M. (1999). Pārmaiņu spēki: izglītības reformu virzieni. Rīga, Zvaigzne
ABC.
Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory. A force for school improvement. Victoria, Centre for Strategic Education, Victoria, 2006.
HEPS (Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability). (2004). Learning and Skills for Sustainable Development. Guidance for Higher Educatio Institutions. London: HEPS.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning . Oxford: Pergamon Press. Pergamon.
Lāslo, E. (2011). Zinātne un akašas lauks. Tulk. L.Lukstraupe. Rīga: Jumava.
Liepa, D. (2011) Svešvalodas apguves komponentu integrācija studiju procesā. Promocijas darba kopsavilkums. Rīga: LU.
Marulevska, K.T. (2011). The Interdisciplinary Dialogue as a path to evolutionary growth of the pedagogical knowledge. Scientific Research, Vol 9, 1-14. Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria: South-West University „Neofit Rilsky”. Electronic Issue. Available at: http://press.swu.bg/media/37596/statiya%20za%20swu_krassimira%20marulevska.pdf
Platons. (1997). Sokrāta prāva. Rīga: Zinātne, 1997.
Priedītis, A. (2011). BSA profesora Artura Priedīša intervija „Haosa poētika jeb kulturoloģiskās paradigmas evolūcija”. Kultūra un Vārds. Available at: http://www.diena.lv/blogi/ia-vadama-haosa-poetika-jeb-kulturologiskas-paradigmas-evolucija-13929100?cp=1#comments
Stacey, R.D. (1992). Managing The Unknowable: strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Буданов, В.Г. (2007). Методология синергетики в постнеклассической науке и в образовании. Москва: Издательство ЛКИ.
Пригожин, И. & Стенгерс, И. (1986). Порядок из хаоса. Новый диалог человека с природой = Order out of Haos. Man’s new dialogue with nature. Пер. с англ./ Общ. ред. В. И. Аршинова, Ю. Л. Климонтовича и Ю. В. Сачкова. Москва: Прогресс.
Роджерс, К. (2004). Взгляд на психотерапию. Становление человека. Перевод М.М.Исениной под ред. д.п.н. Е.И.Исениной. Терминологическая правка В.Данченко
Киев: PSYLIB. Available at: http://psylib.ukrweb.net/books/roger01/index.htm