FEATURES OF ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY REPRESENTATIVES’ INTERCULTURAL UNIVERSALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol7.3915Keywords:
Christianity, ethnic psychology, intercultural universals, Islam, religionAbstract
Issues of intercultural universals among different ethnic and cultural groups’ representatives are becoming very relevant in various branches of scientific and applied knowledge. Religion is one of the factors of intercultural distance, which many ethnic psychologists stress in their research. On the other hand the features of intercultural universals among representatives of different religious groups are studied very little. The goal of the study is to consider intercultural universals and their degree among representatives of two religions: Islam and Christianity. To achieve this goal, we chose the following methods: diagnostics of the Cultural-Value Differential of a personality (CVD, G. Soldatova, S.Ryzhova), diagnostics of basic beliefs (World Assumption Scale, WAS, Janoff-Bulman), diagnostics on cultural preferences in the context of the universal “Individualism-Collectivism” (IC, M.Telepov, N.Telepova). The results of the study revealed that Christians and Muslims have a lot in common in manifestations of intercultural universals, which means that representatives of these religions have a serious basis for dialogue and building relationships. Statistically significant differences were found in terms of benevolence of world and self-control (according to diagnostics on the WAS). Statistically significant differences were also found in terms of peacefulness and openness among Christians (according to diagnostics of the cultural-value differential of a personality).
References
Baer K. (1981). Carl Ernst von Baer on the study of man and nature. New York: Arno Press.
Benedict R. (2005). Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Boas F. (2016). Psychologycal Problems in Anthropology. Redditch: Read books Ltd.
Lazarus M. (2018). The Ethics of Judaism: Santification of life the aim of morality. Miami: HardPress.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive Worlds and the Stress of Traumatic Events: Applications of the Schema Construct. Social Cognition, 17(2), 117. DOI: 10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113
Kardiner, A. (2014) The Mark of Oppession: Exploration in the Personality of the American Negro. Eastford: Martino Fine Books.
Le Bon, G. (2000). Croud: a Study of the Popular Mind. Ontario: Batoche Books.
Mead, M. (2001). Sex and Temperament: In Three Primitive Societies. New York: Harper Perennial.
Telepova, N. N. (2010) Religious addiction: psychological conditions of prevention and recovering. https://www.academia.edu/ Retrieved from
Wundt, W. (2013). An Introduction to Psychology. Redditch: Read books Ltd.
Гумилев, Л. Н. (2007). Открытие Хазарии. М.: Айрис-пресс.
Данилевский Н.Я (2011). Россия и Европа. М.: Институт русской цивилизации.
Зенко, Ю.М. (2009). Психология религии. СПб.: Речь.
Зеньковский, В. В. (2004). Педагогика. Клин: Фонд «Христианская жизнь».
Ионова, А. И. (1993). Концепция личности в современном исламе. Бюллетень Российской Академии Наук, 1, 18-61.
Кавелин, К. Д. (2010). Русский национальный интерес. М.: Изд-во Экономическая газета.
Каранашвили, Г. В. (1984). Этническое самосознание и традиции. Тбилиси : Изд-во ТбГУ.
Крысько, В. Г. (2017). Психология межнациональных отношений: курс лекций. М.: Вузовский учебник: ИНФРА-М.
Лебедева, Н. М. (2011). Методы этнической и кросс-культурной психологии : учеб.-метод. пособие. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики.
Надеждин, Н. И. (2012). Исследование о скопческой ереси. М. : Либроком. Академия фундаментальных исследований.
Солдатова, Г. У. (2011). Диагностика типов этнической идентичности. Из А.А.Бодалев, Психология общения. Энциклопедический словарь. М.: Когнито-центр.
Соловьев, В. С. (2002). Критика отвлеченных начал. М.: Изд-во ДирекМедиа Паблишинг.
Телепова, Н. Н. & Телепов М. Н. (2017). Вопросы этнопсихологии и межкультурного взаимодействия (аспекты психолого-педагогического сопровождения участников образовательного процесса), учебно-методическое пособие. Самара: СФ ГАОУ ВО МГПУ.