INFLUENCE OF CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS ON INNOVATION PROCESSES IN MODERN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Authors

  • Inta Kotane Rezekne Academy of Tehnologies (LV)
  • Irina Yegorova Kryvyi Rih Economic Institute of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (UA)
  • Hanna Puriy Kryvyi Rih Economic Institute of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (UA)
  • Serhii Hushko Polonia University in Czestochowa (PL)
  • Volodymyr Kulishov Polonia University in Czestochowa (PL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3395

Keywords:

crisis phenomena, economic systems, global innovation index, innovation, policy of innovation development, stable development

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyse the relationship between the state of economic systems and the innovative activity of industrial enterprises in accordance with the peculiarities of the development of national economies in the global economic environment. The general scientific research methods are used in the research study: information analysis and synthesis, logical construction, monographic, data grouping, and graphical display methods. The character of the influence of a stable economic system (on the example of Latvia) and an unstable economic system (on the example of Ukraine) on innovative development is established. The main factors stimulating innovations in different national conditions in the context of modern international trends of innovative development are revealed. The main directions of the impact on innovation processes and the principles of innovation development policy are defined.

References

Aljanabi, AbdulQadir, R, A. (2017). The mediating role of absorptive capacity on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and technological innovation capabilities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, pp.1355-2554.

Bloomberg Global Business Forum (2017). Bloomberg Finance Retrieved: https://www.bloomberg.com/global-business-forum-2017, sk.29.01.2018.

Deniņš, A., Lipmans, F. (2011). Inovāciju vadība Latvijas uzņēmumos un to ietekme uz uzņēmumu konkurētspēju. Latvijas Universitātes raksti. Ekonomika. Vadības zinātne, 771.sēj, 442.-456.lpp.

Do, T.H., Mazzarol, T., Volery, T., Reboud, S. (2014). Predicting anticipated rent from innovation commercialisation in SMEs, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 17 Issue: 2,pp.183-208.

Ekonomikas ministrija (2017a). Latvijas novērtējums starptautiskajos inovāciju reitingos – apliecinājums stabilai un ilgtspējīgai valsts attīstībai. Pieejams: https://goo.gl/yPPM9u , sk.29.01.2018.

Ekonomikas ministrija (2017b). Inovāciju politika. Pieejams: www.lizda.lv/content/files/Inovacija_NTPS.pdf, sk.29.01.2018.

European Commission (2017). European Innovation Scoreboard. Retrieved: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_lv, sk.29.01.2018.

Forsman, H., Rantanen, H. (2011).Small manufacturing and service enterprises as innovators: a comparison by size, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14 Issue: 1, pp.27-50.

Kocak, A., Carsrud, I., Oflazoglu, S. (2017). Market, entrepreneurial, and technology orientations: impact on innovation and firm performance, Management Decision, Vol.55 Issue: 2, pp.248-270.

Kulishov, V. (2013). Trends and challenges of innovation economy. Journal of European economy, 12 (3), 324-333.

Nacionālās industriālās politikas pamatnostādnes 2014.-2020.gadam (2013). Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr.282. Pieejams: http://polsis.mk.gov.lv/documents/4391, sk.29.01.2018.

Par Nacionālo inovāciju programmu 2003.-2006.gadam. (2003). Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr.205. Pieejams: https://goo.gl/oXkEps, sk.28.01.2018.

Saunila, M. (2017). Understanding innovation performance measurement in SMEs, Measuring Business Excellence,Vol. 21 Issue: 1, pp.1-16.

Serrano‐Bedia, Ana Ma., López‐Fernández, Ma C., García‐Piqueres, G. (2012). Complementarity between innovation activities and innovation performance: Evidence from Spanish innovative firms, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 23 Issue: 5, pp.557-577.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian], sk.29.01.2018.

The Global Innovation Index (2017). The Local Dynamics of Innovation. Retrieved: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-economy sk.29.01.2018.

Zinātnes un tehnoloģijas attīstības un inovācijas pamatnostādnes 2014.-2020.gadam (2013). Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr.685, Pieejams: http://polsis.mk.gov.lv/documents/4608, sk.29.01.2018.

Zinātniskās darbības likums (2005). LR likums. Pieejams: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=107337 sk.29.01.2018.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-25

Issue

Vol. 6 (2018): SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. May 25th-26th, 2018, Volume VI, ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Section

Economics and Public Administration

How to Cite

Kotane, I., Yegorova, I., Puriy, H., Hushko, S., & Kulishov, V. (2018). INFLUENCE OF CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS ON INNOVATION PROCESSES IN MODERN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 6, 294-303. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3395
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC