THE MARITAL STATUS AND THE HAPPINESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol1.1513Keywords:
marital status, cohabitation, marriage, happinessAbstract
The changes in the family as the social institution that are described as the second demographic transition revealed the reality of new social links, affected the selection of the strategies and methods of family establishment and led to the family de-institutionalization processes. The changes had also affected the status of formal and informal roles in the family. Those changes catalyzed the greater variety of families and households which can be illustrated by the spread of cohabitation and the increased numbers of children born outside the traditional marriage. The above changes demonstrate the conscious choices to family relationship building. Present research paper aims to find out how does the human happiness which is mostly described by a subjective well-being index depend on the family status.
References
Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Durham. Duke University Press.
Ambrazevičiūtė, K., Kavoliūnaitė-Ragauskienė, E., Mizaras, V. (2012). Šeimos kaip teisės kategorijos turinys Lietuvos Respublikos įstatymuose. Teisės problemos, 4(79), 74-107.
Bitinas, B. (2006). Edukologinis tyrimas: sistema ir procesas. Vilnius: Kronta.
Bok, D. (2010). The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being. New Yersey: Princeton University Press.
Camfield, L., Guillen-Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2010). Does Needs Satisfaction Matter for Psychological and Subjective Wellbeing in Developing Countries: A Mixed-Methods Illustration from Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal Of Happiness Studies, 11(4), 497-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9154-5
Česnuitytė, V. (2008). Matrimonialinės elgsenos strategijos šiandieninėje Lietuvoje: atspindys žiniasklaidoje. Socialinis darbas, 7(2), 25-43.
Čyžiūtė, J. (2007). Veiklios moters socialiniai vaidmenys šeiminės partnerystės kontekste. Filosofija. Sociologija, 18(2), 55-63.
Demografijos metraštis [Demographic Yearbook] 2014. (2015). Vilnius: Lietuvos statistikos departamentas.
ESOMAR. ICC/ ESOMAR. (2008). International Code on Market and Social Research.
Cropley, A. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods. An Introduction for Students of Psychology and Education. Rīga: Zinātne.
Fatima, M., Ajmal, M. A. (2012). Happy Marriage: A Qualitative study. Pakistan Journal Of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 38-43.
Hamplova, D. (2006). Životní spokojenost, štěstí a rodinný stav v 21 evropských zemích. Czech Sociological Review, 42(1), 35-55.
Yu, Y., Aim´e, R., Dechter, A. R., Sobel, M. E. (2004). Marriage at the Extremes: Comparing Union Happiness in Marriage and Cohabitation. Downloaded from http://paa2005.princeton.edu
Khodarahimi, S. (2015). The Role of Marital Status in Emotional Intelligence, Happiness, Optimism and Hope. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies, 46(3), 351-371.
Layard, R. (2009). Die glückliche Gesellschaft: Kurswechsel für Politik und Wirtschaft. Frankfurt/New York.
Lehr, V. (2003). Relationship Rights for a Queer Society: Why Gay Activism Needs to Move Away from the Right to Marriage. Child, Family, State [Edited by S. Macedo, I. M. Young]. New York: New York University Press, 306-340.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 111(51), 18112-18115.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population & Development Review, 36(2), 211-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
Lietuvos šeima: tarp tradicijos ir naujos realybės. (2009). [Edited by V. Stankūnienė, A. Maslauskaitė]. Vilnius: Socialinių tyrimų institutas.
Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgelis, Y., Diener, E. (2003). Re-examining adaptation and the set point model of happiness. Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.527
Maslauskaitė, A. (2014). Lietuvos demografinis kelias: praeities ir lyginamoji perspektyvos. Demografija visiems, 1, 12-13.
Navaitis, G. (2013). Attitude of older persons towards cohabitation. Social work: research papers, 12, (2), 353-362.
Preacher, K. J. (2001). Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence. Downloaded from <http://quantpsy.org>
Soons, J. P. M., Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1141 – 1157.
Stack S., Eshleman J. R., (1982). Marital Status and Happiness: A17-Nation Study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00660.x
Stankūnienė, V., Jasilionis, D., Baublytė, M. (2014). Lietuvos demografinis kelias: praeities ir lyginamoji perspektyvos. Demografija visiems, 1, 3-8.
Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and Children as a Key to Happiness? Cross-National Differences in the Effects of Marital Status and Children on Well-Being. Journal Of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 501-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9340-8
Westheimer, R., Yagoda, B. (1997). The value of family: a blueprint for the 21st century. New York: Warner Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
