SOCIO-PEDAGOGICAL SUPPORT TO YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN INTEGRATION PROCESS

Tamara Pigozne; Aivars Pigoznis

doi:10.17770/sie2016vol3.1463

Authors

Tamara Pigozne University of Latvia (LV)
Aivars Pigoznis Rezekne Art and Design Secondary School (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol3.1463

Keywords:

integration, participation, socio-pedagogical support, values, recognition, trust, encouragement, respect, empathy, cooperation, mentoring

Abstract

The purpose of the article is on the basis of theoretical formulations to analyze participation and integration as pedagogical category and socio-pedagogical means, facilitating the participation of youth in integration process in two aspects – in educational system and labour market, linkages between participation and understanding the integration as terminal (related to life goals), instrumental (means of reaching life goals) and opportune (related to opportunities) value as well as implicants of efficient participation.

References

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute Planner, 35. Jg. 1969, p. 216 – 224.

Buchkremer, H. (1995). Handbuch Sozialpädagogik: Dimensionen sozialer und gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen durch Erziehung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Checkoway, B. (1998). Involving young people in neighborhood development. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, p. 765–795.

Checkoway, B. & Richards-Schuster, K. (2003). Youth Participation in Community Evaluation Research. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 2003, p.21-33.

Dam, L., Hufeisen, B. (1995). Undervisningdifferentiering i fremmedsprog. Foreng Malling Back.

Donaldson, S. I., Ensher, E. A., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2000). Longitudinal examination of mentoring relationships on organizational commitment and citizenship behavior. Journal of Career Development, 26, p. 233-249.

Eurydice Brief: Early Leaving from Education and Training (2015). Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. http://www.viaa.gov.lv/lat/izglitibas_petijumi/eurydice/eurydice_publikacijas/

Europa 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (2010). Brussels, European Commision. http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf

Flusser, V. (1994). Von der Freiheit des Migranten. Köln.

Frankl, E.V. (1946). Trotzdem Ja Zum Leben Sagen: Ein Psychologe erlebt das Konzentrationslager. Verlag für Jugend und Volk.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press, 1970.

Friedman, T. (2005). The World Is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux, Hardcover.

Harder, M.K., Burford, G., & Hoover, E. (2013). What Is Participation? Design Leads the Way to a Cross-Disciplinary Framework. DesignIssues: Volume 29, Number 4 Autumn 2013, p.41-57.

Held, J. (2009). Wege der Integration imerziehungs- und Bildungsprozess- internationale Perspektiven. In: Sauer, K., Held, J. (Hrsg.) Wege der Integration in heterogenen Gesellschaften. Wiesbaden: Verlag. S. 7 – 12.

Held, J. & Riegel, C. (1999). Integrations – und Ausgrenzungsprobleme Jugendlicher. In: Held, J., Spona, A. A. (Hg.): Jugend zwischen Ausgrenzung und Integration. Ergebnisse eines internationalen Forschungsprojekts. Riga, Hamburg, S. 59-88.

Informatīvais ziņojums par jauniešu garantijas īstenošanu Latvijā 2014.-2018.gadā. (2013). Rīga. http://www.lm.gov.lv/upload/jauniesiem/lmzin_jg_171213.pdf

Jaunieši darba tirgū: situācijas un nodarbinātību ietekmējošo faktoru analīze. Rīga, Socioloģisko pētījumu institūts, 2007.

Jones, K. (1996). Trust as an Affective Attitude, Ethics, 107:1 (October), pp. 4–25.

Kalpaka, A. (1986). Handlungsfähigkeit statt „Integration”. Schulische und ausserschulische Lebensbedingungen und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten griechischer Jugendlicher. Weinheim, München.

Karpova, Ā. (1994). Personība un individuālais stils. Rīga.

Kirby, P., Lanyon, C., Cronin, K. & Sinclair, R. (2003). Building a Culture of Participation. National Children’s Bureau.

Klafki, W. (1991). Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik: Zeitgemässe Allgemeinbildung und kritisch –konstruktive Didaktik. Weinheim, Basel.

Kreckel, R. (1994) Soziale Integration und nationale Identität. In: Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 4. Jg., Heft 1, S. 13 – 20.

Maslo, I. (2002). Mazākumtautību pamatizglītības programmu ieviešanas monitorings. In: Decade of reform: Achievements, Challengies, Problems. Rīga.

Mecheril, P. (2003). Prekäre Verhältnisse. Über natio – ethno – kulturell (Mehrfach-) Zugehörigkeit. Münster.

Metodoloģiskās vadlīnijas darbam ar mērķa grupas jauniešiem projektā „Proti un dari!” (2015). Rīga, Jaunatnes starptautisko programmu aģentūra. http://jaunatne.gov.lv/sites/default/files/web/Jauniesu_garantija/jaunumi/metodologiskas_vadlinijas_19_10_2015.pdf

Morales, A.T. & Sheafor, B.W. (2011). Social work: A profession of many faces. Prentice Hall.

Olk, Th. (1994). Jugendhilfe als Diensleistung. Widersprüche, 53. Jg. S. 11 – 33.

Otto, H. U. & Thiersch, H. (2001). Handbuch der Sozialarbeit. Sozialpädagogik. Luchterhand.

Parsons, R.M. (2011). Fundamentals of the Helping Process. 2nd Edition. Waveland Press. Available at: https://books.google.lv/books?id=kYsbAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA7&dq=helping+process+values&hl=lv&sa=X&ei=LJ2bVZqiD4WssAHGk4_IBQ&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=helping%20process%20values&f=false

Percy-Smith, B. & Thomas, N. (2010). A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation, Routledge.

Petersen, K. (1999). Neuorientierung im Jugendamt. Neuwied.

Riegel, C. (2009). Integration – ein schlagwort? Zum umgang mit einem problematischen Begriff. In: Sauer K. E., Held J. (Hrsg.) Wege der Integration in heterogenen Gesellschaften. Wiesbaden: Verlag. S. 23 – 40.

Riegel, C. (2004). Im Kampf um Zugehörigkeit und Anerkennung. Frankfurt am Main. London.

Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding human values: individual and societal. N. Y.: Free Press.

Sniķere, S., Koroļeva, I., Aleksandrovs, A. & Kārkliņa, I. (2010). Research on the Training Needs and Interests of Youth in Remote or Underdeveloped Regions. Institute for Sociological Research, Riga.

Sotkasiira, T., Haikkola, L. & Horelli, L. (2010). Building towards effective participation: alearning-based network approach to youth participation. In: A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from theory and practice, Routledge, pp.174-183.

Small, S. & Memmo, M. (2004). Contemporary Models of Youth Development and Problem Prevention: Toward an Integration of Terms, Concepts, and Models.

Šulcs, D. (2005). Uzticēšanās skolotāja un skolēna attiecībās. Skolotājs, Nr. 6.,7. – 13.

Warren, M. E. (1993). Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Political Psychology, 14, Jg. S. 2009 – 234.

Weber, M. (2007). Ethnisierung und männlicher Gewalt. Männlichkeit und Herkunft als Orientierung und Falle. In: Riegel C., Geisen T. (Hrsg.) Jugend, Zugehörigkeit und Migration. Wiesbaden: Verlag. S. 307 – 322.

Working on work for all. (2009). SALTO-YOUTH Inclusion Resource Centre https://www.salto-youth.net/downloads/4-17-1948/WorkingOnWork.pdf

Youth in Labour Market: Analysis of the Situation and Factors Influencing Employment. (2007). Riga, Institute for Sociological Research.

Youth Participation Guide: Assessment, Planning and Implementation. (2008). A Family Health International.