TEACHERS' TRAINING AND INCLUSIVE METACOGNITIVE TOOLS

Authors

  • Viviana Vinci University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol3.1438

Keywords:

inclusion, metacognition, training, teachers' professional knowledge, reflection methodologies, Education for all, professional writing, maps, case studies

Abstract

A Research&Training project has been set up involving people attending courses for teaching qualification; the aim was to develop metacognitive tools to create inclusive reflection methodologies aimed at enhancing mental skills dealing with inclusive education. The theoretical framework combines the studies in professional Education and Teachers' Thinking with reflection-based and metacognitive training paradigms. By means of workshops, a reflecive-oriented metacognitive tool for inclusive training has been created; four individual writing activities were carried out, including professional writing, maps and case studies, together with a group project. The results showed the need to develop new educational devices and a shared language of teachers' professional knowledge that can be useful to adapt any context in the inclusive perspective of the so-called Education for all.

References

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2011). Teacher education for inclusion across europe. Challenges and opportunities. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

Altet, M., Charlier, E., Paquay, L., Perrenoud, P. (1996). Former des enseignants professionnels. Quelles stratégies? Quelles compétence? Paris: De Boeck & Larcier.

Armstrong, F., Armstrong, D., Barton, L. (2000). Inclusive Education: Policy, Contexts and Comparative Perspectives. London: David Fulton Publishers.

Barton, L. (1997). Inclusive education: Romantic, subversive or realistic?, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1, 231-242.

Booth, T., Ainscow (2002). Index for Inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: CSIE.

Cabaroglu, N., Roberts, J. (2000). Developments in student teachers’ preexisting beliefs during a one-year P.G.C.E. programme. System, 28(3), 387-402.

Calderhead, J. (1987). Exploring Teachers’ Thinking. London: Cassel Education.

Calderhead, J., Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(1), 1-8.

Clark, C.M., Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., 255-296). New York: Macmillan.

Cross, D.R., Paris, S.G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.

Damiano, E. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Day, C., Pope, M., Denicolo, P. (1990). Insights Into Teachers’ Thinking And Practice. London: Palmer Press.

Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston: Heath.

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Florian, L. (2012). Teacher education for inclusion: A research agenda for the future. In C. Forlin (Ed.). Future directions for inclusive teacher education: An international perspective (210-218). London: Routledge.

Goodman, J. (1988). Constructing a Practical Philosophy of Teaching: a Study of Preservice Teachers’ Professional Perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 121-137;

Lenoir, Y., Vanhulle, S., (2006). L’état de la recherche au Québec sur la formation à l’enseignement. Vers de nouvelles perspectives de recherché. Sherbrooke: Éditions du CRP.

Lewins, A., Silver, C. (2007). Using Software in Qualitative Research. A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage.

Mortari, L. (2007). Cultura della ricerca e pedagogia. Prospettive epistemologiche. Roma: Carocci,.

Nespor, J. (1987). The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.

Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.

Oliver, M., Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion. Harlow: Longman.

Olson, M.R., Osborne, J.W. (1991). Learning to Teach: The First Year. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(4), 331-343.

Pacifico, M., Coppola, L. (2010). Nvivo: una risorsa metodologica. Procedure per l’analisi dei dati qualitativi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Paris, S.G., Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7–15.

Perla, L. (2010). Didattica dell’implicito. Ciò che l’insegnante non sa. Brescia: La Scuola.

Perla, L. (2013). Per una didattica dell’inclusione: prove di formalizzazione. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.

Pijl, S.J., Meijer, C.J.W., Hegarty, S. (1997). Inclusive Education: A Global Agenda. London Routledge.

Reber, A.S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: an Essay on The Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, L., Morse, J.M. (2009). Fare ricerca qualitativa. Prima guida (tr. it). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J., Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.

Schraw, G., Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: a contemporary perspective. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Stadler, M.A., Frensch, P.A. (Eds.) (1998). Handbook of implicit learning. London: Sage.

Striano, M. (2001). La razionalità riflessiva nell’agire educativo. Napoli: Liguori.

Thomas, G., Loxley, A. (2007). Deconstructing Special Education And Constructing Inclusion. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

UNESCO, The Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments Adopted by the World Education Forum. Including six regional frameworks for action, Dakar, Senegal, 26-28 April 2000.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-26

How to Cite

Vinci, V. (2016). TEACHERS’ TRAINING AND INCLUSIVE METACOGNITIVE TOOLS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol3.1438