FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN CYBERSPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/iss2017.3021Keywords:
Anonomity, cyberspace, freedom of expression, human rights, online platformsAbstract
This report includes information about freedom of expression and ability to execute the guaranteed freedom in the cyberspace. Thesis examine the question falling under the scope of human rights online. More particularly, it displays cyberspace security and vulnerability problems regarding guaranteed right to freedom of expression in cyberspace. The discussion concern two sides of the coin: individuals who participate and communicate through online platforms and consequences of their actions – impact on intermediaries. It is an essential topic as modern and digital technologies develop more and more every day alluring new participants who should understand what can be said online, how their actions can be protected, freedom executed and what are liabilities imposed to online service providers.Downloads
References
E – commerce directive, Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services in the Internal Market [2000] OJ L178/1, art 14-15. (E – komercijas Direktīva) [tiešsaiste].Pieejams: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTML. [atsauce 08.05.2017.].
European Convention on Human Rights (as amended by protocols Nos. 11 and 14, supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1,4,6,7,12,13), 1 June 2010. (Eiropas Cilvēktiesību konvencija) [tiešsaiste]. Pieejams: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. [atsauce 08.05.2017.].
Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey, application no. 3111/10. ECHR 2012. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: https://lovdata.no/static/EMDN/emd-2010-003111.pdf.
Akdeniz v. Turkey, (11 March, 2014, unreported), [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: :.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142383#{"itemid":["001-142383"]}.
Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48226/10 and 14027/11, ECHR 2015 (extracts). [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158948#{"itemid":["001-158948"]}
Delfi AS v. Estonia (GC), application no. 64569/09, ECHR 2015. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155105#{"itemid":["001-155105"]}.
Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine, application no. 33014/05 , ECHR 2011. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.teutas.it/attachments/832_Editorial-Board-of-Pravoye-Delo.pdf.
K.U. v. Finland, application no. 2872/02, ECHR 2008[online] [cited 08.05.2017]. Available from Internet : https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/dataprotection/Judgments/K.U.%20v.%20FINLAND%20en.pdf.
MTE and Index.hu Zrt v Hungary, (2 February, 2016, unreported). [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2016/135.html.
Paul Chambers v. Director of Public Prosecutions (27 July 2012, unreported). [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2012/2157.html.
Bratza Nicolas , Freedom of expression: essays in honour of Nicolas Bratza, President of the Court of Human Rights ( “Vārda brīvība – raksti par godu Nikolasam Bratzam, Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesas tiesnesim”) - Vajic N. and Voyatzis P., „The Internet and freedom of expression: a „brave new world” and the European Court of Human Rights’ evolving case law” (“Eiropas Cilvēķtiesību tiesas prakses piemēri jautājumā - vārda brīvība internetā – drosmīga jaunā pasaule”). Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2012.
Duterte G., Key case -law extracts, European Court of Human Rights, (“Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesas spriedumu apkopojums”) Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2003.
Gibson William: Neuromancer , page 51, published by Ace Books, E. Rutherford, New Jersey, USA, 1986.
Harris D.J., O’Boyle and Warbrick, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. (“Eiropas Cilvēktiesību konvencijas likumi”) Ney York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Council of Europe, Freedom of expression and the Internet (2014). (“Vārda brīvība un internets”) Strasbourg, FRA: Council of Europe, 2014, para 5.2., p. 75. Pieejama Ebrary datubāzē. [atsauce 08.05.2017.].
Johnson D.R., Post D., Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, (“Jurisprudences attīstība kibertelpā). Volume 48, May 1996. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=535.
Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, 17th session. Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, including the rights to development. UN Doc.: A/HRC/17/27 (16 May 2011). Para. 23,27,28,85. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A.HRC.17.27_en.pdf.
UN Human Rights Council (5 July 2012), Resolution A/HRC/20/8 on the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, 20/8, 31st meeting, 5 July 2012, paragraph 1. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session20/A-HRC-20-2_en.pdf.
Center for democracy and technology, Shielding the messengers: protecting platforms for expression and innovation. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: https://cdt.org/files/pdfs/CDT-Intermediary-Liability-2012.pdf.
ECHR Blog, Offensive online comments – new ECtHR judgment. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://echrblog.blogspot.com/2016/02/offensive-online-comments-new-ecthr.html .
Free Word Centre. Freedom of information. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: https://www.article19.org/pages/en/freedom-of-information-more.html.
ICT Indicators database, The key 2005-2015 ICT data of ITU World Telecommunication for the world, by geographic regions and by level of development. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2015/ITU_Key_2005-2015_ICT_data.xls.
K. Georgaki, E. Giakoumakis, A. Rollo, Escaping the Slippery Slope: Freedom of Expression and Cyberspace Regulation after the Delfi case. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.cuspe.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Georgaki_Giakoumakis_Rollo_2016.pdf.
Marie – Andree Weiss, Delfi v. Esonia : Ice Roads and Chilling Effect at the European Court of Human Rights. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.maw-law.com/internet-law/delfi-v-estonia-ice-roads-and-chilling-effect-at-the-european-court-of-human-rights/.
Official YouTube Blog, It is YouTubes 7th birthday . . . and you have outdone yourselves, again. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2012/05/its-youtubes-7th-birthday-and-youve.html.
Ronen Perry and Tal Z. Zarsky ,Liability for online anonymous speech: comparative and economic analysis. [online] [cited 08.05.2017] Available from Internet: http://www.degruyter.com/dg/viewarticle.fullcontentlink:pdfeventlink/$002fj$002fjetl.2014.5.issue-2$002fjetl-2014-0012$002fjetl-2014-0012.pdf/jetl-2014-0012.pdf?t:ac=j$002fjetl.2014.5.issue-2$002fjetl-2014-0012$002fjetl-2014-0012.xml.
