BARK ABRASION EVALUATION ON BIRCH (BETULA SPP.) ROUND TIMBER BY USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM

Authors

  • Janis Magaznieks VMF LATVIA SIA (LV)
  • Mareks Millers VMF LATVIA SIA (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8685

Keywords:

Birch, bark detection, machine learning

Abstract

Birch has an exceedingly high potential from the point of view of cultivation, respectively, now in Latvia more and more new factories are being opened that produce birch plywood and the demand for birch round timber is increasing every year. Latvian legislation, as well as business relations between different trading parties, require accurate determination of the volume of round timber without bark. Automatic measuring devices mainly determine the diameter with bark and then reduce it using bark algorithms. Machine learning has great potential in labour shortage. During machine learning, a computerized system could analyse large amounts of data and diverse properties [1]. Convolutional neural network can ensure the system's resistance to image defects due to various types of lighting conditions, image shifts and changes in their shapes, which can be caused by the characteristics of the camera lens [2]. One of the tasks of timber measurement process is to assess the amount of bark abrasion, as well as the thickness of the bark. Within the framework of the project, we have investigated the possibilities of determining the area of bark abrasion of round timber using machine learning algorithms. To assess the accuracy of the model, we have randomly selected 90 round timber samples from the system, which have been marked by a timber scaler in a computer program, as well as the computer program itself. On software with image processing and analysis capabilities, visual data of the side surface of round timber were evaluated, manually assessing the areas of bark abrasion. The obtained results were compared with the bark mass obtained using the prepared computer vision algorithm. Machine learning algorithm, on average, calculates smaller bark mass – 76 %, compared to the manually obtained results – 84 %. Bark abrasions and most of the remaining bark can be assessed without difficulty for round timber with a darker and more crusty bark, for example, for cuts prepared from the thick end of the trunk. For birch round timber with a white colour, in some cases, part of the white colour is perceived as bark abrasion and, therefore, a smaller majority of remaining bark is assessed. To assess the volume of round timber without bark, the proportion of bark must be assessed, which must be calculated from the total volume of the measured diameter with bark. When assessing the coincidence of the determined bark types, it can be observed that the bark type according to the computer vision algorithm coincides in 79 % of cases with the bark type obtained after manual processing of visual data.

 

Supporting Agencies
Forest Sector Competence Centre of Latvia project “Determining the quality of round timber using machine learning algorithms, measured individually with an automatic measuring device” (Recovery and Resilience Facility, 5.1.1.2.i.0/1/22/A/CFLA/007).

References

E. P. Adeghe, C. A. Okolo and O. T. Ojeyinka, “A review of the use of machine learning in predictive analytics for patient health outcomes in pharmacy practice,” Open Access Research Journal of Life Sciences, vol. 7, p. 52-58, April 2024. [Online]. Available: Open Access Research Journals, https://oarjpublication.com. [Accessed February 2, 2025], https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjls.2024.7.1.0026

S. Hijazi, R. Kumar and C. Rowen, “Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Recognition,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-Convolutional-Neural-Networks-for-Image-By-Hijazi-Kumar/bbf7b5bdc39f9b8849c639c11f4726e36915a0da. [Accessed: Feb. 2, 2025].

J. K. Denzler, A. Weidenhiller and M. Golser, “Comparison of different approaches for automatic bark detection on log images,” Wood Science and Technology, vol. 47, pp. 749–761, March 2013. [Online]. Available: Springer Nature Link, https://link.springer.com/. [Accessed February 2, 2025], https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0536-9

Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia, “Noteikumi par koku un apaļo kokmateriālu uzskaiti”, Cabinet Regulation No. 744, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://likumi.lv. [Accessed: Feb. 2, 2025].

M. A. Fonseca, “The Measurement of Roundwood: Methodologies and Conversion Ratios,” Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 2005. [Online]. Available: CABI Digital Library, https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/. [Accessed February 2, 2025], https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990798.0000

J. Edlund, “Methods for automatic grading of saw logs,” D. thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2004.

Measurement of Round Timber, LVS 82:2024, 2024.

G. Kain, M. C. Barbu and A. Petutschnigg, Insulation material made from tree bark, XIV World Forestry Congress, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, September 7-11, 2015, Durban, South Africa.

A. Weidenhiller, “Automatic recognition of partially missing bark on round timber,” D. thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria, 2022.

P. Zaton, P. Kozakiewicz and P. Mankowski, “Investigation of round Scots pine wood WC01 class using X-ray computer tomography,” Annals of WULS – SGGW, Forestry and Wood Technology, vol. 117, p. 97-105, April 2022. [Online]. Available: Index Copernicus, https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/. [Accessed February 5, 2025], https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.0487

T. Gergel, T. Bucha, R. Gracovský, M. Chamula and M. Gejdoš, “Computed Tomography as a Tool for Quantification and Classification of Roundwood—Case Study,” Forests, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1042, July 2022. [Online]. Available: MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/. [Accessed February 5, 2025], https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071042

P. Sun, “A Wood Quality Defect Detection System Based on Deep Learning and Multicriterion Framework,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2022, July 2022. [Online]. Available: Wiley, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com. [Accessed February 5, 2025], https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3234148

Y. Sun, Q. Lin, X. He, Y. Zhao, F. Dai, J. Qiu and Y. Cao, “Wood Species Recognition with Small Data: A Deep Learning Approach,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 14, p. 1451 – 1460, March 2021. [Online]. Available: Atlantis Press, https://www.atlantis-press.com/. [Accessed February 5, 2025], https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.210423.001

JSC “Latvijas valsts meži”, “Appendix 5, Roundwood Measurement Rules,” September 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.lvm.lv/biznesa-partneriem/koksnes-produkti/pardosana/aktualitates-un-piedavajumi/aicinam-pieteikties-ilgaka-termina-sadarbibai-koksnes-produktu-iegadei-2025-2027-gada. [Accessed: Feb. 12, 2025].

R. Mirski, A. Trocinski, J. Kawalerczyk and M. Wieruszewski, “Pine Logs Sorting as a Function of Bark Thickness,” Forests, vol. 12, no. 7:893, July 2021. [Online]. Available: MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/. [Accessed February 20, 2025], https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070893

Downloads

Published

11.06.2025

How to Cite

[1]
J. Magaznieks and M. Millers, “BARK ABRASION EVALUATION ON BIRCH (BETULA SPP.) ROUND TIMBER BY USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 349–353, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.17770/etr2025vol1.8685.