LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF THINNING IN NATURAL PINE FORESTS UNDERGROWTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8683Keywords:
pine, thinning, undergrowthAbstract
Ground cover vegetation is crucial for biodiversity in northern conifer forests, providing habitat, food, and ecosystem functions like seedling regeneration and nutrient cycling. Their composition is shaped by tree species, canopy structure, and environmental factors like temperature, light, water, and soil nutrients. Forest management can modify these processes by increasing light availability, fostering conditions more typical of a natural pine forest biotope, and promoting plant growth. This study aimed to assess whether natural pine forest management influenced ground cover vegetation over 20 years. Six plots across three locations were analyzed. In the studied managed plots, first-story pine trees were thinned by removing second-story spruces between 2004 and 2005. Some plots were thinned (managed), while others remained untouched (control). Initial vegetation assessments recorded species in 10×10m plots before thinning. In 2024, vegetation was reassessed using transects with three 1×1m plots placed along cardinal directions. Vegetation was categorized into trees and shrubs, herbs, mosses, and lichens. The 2024 assessment of managed plots revealed a decline in moss and lichen species, a slight increase in herbaceous species, and a more pronounced increase in tree and shrub species. The opposite trend was observed in control plots. Shannon index values showed significant differences between years (p=0.03) across all vegetation layers but not between management types or factor interactions. Similarly, the total species count varied significantly between years (p=0.02) but not between management types. However, within small 1×1m plots (2024), species count differed significantly between management types (p=0.004). These findings suggest that thinning influences ground cover vegetation composition over time, promoting tree and shrub growth while reducing moss and lichen cover. Species diversity shifts appear more pronounced at finer spatial scales, highlighting the importance of localized conditions in shaping ground cover vegetation dynamics.
References
S. Barbier, F. Gosselin, and P. Balandier, “Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved-A critical review for temperate and boreal forests,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038.
S. A. Hart and H. Y. H. Chen, “Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests,” CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 381–397, 2006, doi: 10.1080/07352680600819286.
S. A. Hart and H. Y. H. Chen, “Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and competition in boreal forest,” Ecol Monogr, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 123–140, 2008. doi: 10.1890/06-2140.1.
K. Verheyen, L. Baeten, P. De Frenne, M. Bernhardt-Römermann, J. Brunet, J. Cornelis, G. Decocq, H. Dierschke, O. Eriksson, R. Hédl, T. Heinken, M. Hermy, P. Hommel, K. Kirby, T. Naaf, G. Peterken, P. Petřík, J. Pfadenhauer, H. Van Calster, G.R. Walther, M. Wulf, G. Verstraeten, “Driving factors behind the eutrophication signal in understorey plant communities of deciduous temperate forests,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 352–365, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01928.x.
P. De Frenne,F. Rodríguez-Sánchez, D. Anthony Coomes, L. Baeten, G. Verstraeten, M. Vellend, M. Bernhardt-Römermann, C. D. Brown, J. Brunet, J. Cornelis, G. M. Decocq, H. Dierschke, O. Eriksson, F. S. Gilliam, R. Hédl, T. Heinken, M. Hermy, P. Hommel, M. A. Jenkins, D. L. Kelly, KG. Peterken, P. J. Kirby, F. J. G. Mitchell, T. Naaf, M. Newman, G. Peterken, P. Pet rík, J. Schultz, G. Sonnier, H. Van Calster, D. M. Waller, G.R. Walther, P. S. White, K. D. Woods, M. Wulf, B. J. Graae, K. Verheyen, “Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 110, no. 46, pp. 18561–18565, 2013, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311190110.
A. Guisan and W. Thuiller, “Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models,” Ecol Lett, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 993–1009, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x.
P. O. Hedwall, E. Holmström, M. Lindbladh, and A. Felton, “Concealed by darkness: How stand density can override the biodiversity benefits of mixed forests,” Ecosphere, vol. 10, no. 8, 2019, doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2835.
S. F. Bartels and H. Y. H. Chen, “Interactions between overstorey and understorey vegetation along an overstorey compositional gradient,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 543–552, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01479.x.
Y. Zhang, D. Yin, M. Sun, H. Wang, K. Tian, D. Xiao, W. Zhang, “Variations of climate-growth response of major conifers at upper distributional limits in Shika Snow Mountain, Northwestern Yunnan Plateau, China,” Forests, vol. 8, no. 10, 2017, doi: 10.3390/f8100377.
R. Van Couwenberghe, C. Collet, E. Lacombe, and J. C. Gégout, “Abundance response of western European forest species along canopy openness and soil pH gradients,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 262, no. 8, pp. 1483–1490, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.049.
C. Greiser, E. Meineri, M. Luoto, J. Ehrlén, and K. Hylander, “Monthly microclimate models in a managed boreal forest landscape,” Agric For Meteorol, vol. 250–251, no. May 2017, pp. 147–158, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.252.
F. Tinya, S. Márialigeti, I. Király, B. Németh, and P. Ódor, “The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in O{double acute}rség, Western Hungary,” Plant Ecol, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 69–81, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11258-008-9566-z.
S. B. Jennings, N. D. Brown, and D. Sheil, “Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: Canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures,” Forestry, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 1999, doi: 10.1093/forestry/72.1.59.
D. S. Wilson and K. J. Puettmann, “Density management and biodiversity in young Douglas-fir forests: Challenges of managing across scales,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 246, no. 1 SPEC. ISS., pp. 123–134, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.052.
T. Nagaike, T. Kamitani, and T. Nakashizuka, “The effect of shelterwood logging on the diversity of plant species in a beech (Fagus crenata) forest in Japan,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 118, no. 1–3, pp. 161–171, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00500-3.
S. C. Thomas, C. B. Halpern, D. A. Falk, D. A. Liguori, and K. A. Austin, “Plant Diversity in Managed Forests: Understory Responses to Thinning and Fertilization,” Ecological Applications, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 864, 1999, doi: 10.2307/2641335.
P. Kolari et al., “Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 221, no. 1–3, pp. 241–248, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.021.
M. Nilsson and D. Wardle, “Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem drive: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest,” Front Ecol Environ, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 421–428, 2005, doi: 10.1890/100071.
C. B. Halpern and T. A. Spies, “Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific northwest,” Ecological Applications, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 913–934, 1995, doi: 10.2307/2269343.
M. D. Busse, P. H. Cochran, and J. W. Barrett, “Changes in Ponderosa Pine Site Productivity following Removal of Understory Vegetation,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1614–1621, 1996, doi: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060004x.
X. Chen and H. Y. H. Chen, “Plant diversity loss reduces soil respiration across terrestrial ecosystems,” Glob Chang Biol, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1482–1492, 2019, doi: 10.1111/gcb.14567.
F. S. Gilliam, “The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems,” Bioscience, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 845–858, 2007, doi: 10.1641/B571007.
J. Kuusipalo, “An ecological study of upland forest site classification in southern Finland.,” Silva Fenn, no. 192, 7638, 1985. doi: 10.14214/aff.7638.
C. Ste-Marie and D. Paré, “Soil, pH and N availability effects on net nitrification in the forest floors of a range of boreal forest stands,” Soil Biol Biochem, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1579–1589, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00086-3.
S. Natalia, V. J. Lieffers, and S. M. Landhäusser, “Effects of leaf litter on the growth of boreal feather mosses: Implication for forest floor development,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 253–260, 2008, doi: 10.3170/2008-8-18367.
L. Petersson, E. Holmström, M. Lindbladh, and A. Felton, “Tree species impact on understory vegetation: Vascular plant communities of Scots pine and Norway spruce managed stands in northern Europe,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 448, no. May, pp. 330–345, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.011.
A. Uotila and J. Kouki, “Understorey vegetation in spruce-dominated forests in eastern Finland and Russian Karelia: Successional patterns after anthropogenic and natural disturbances,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 215, no. 1–3, pp. 113–137, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.008.
P. Kumar, H. Y. H. Chen, E. B. Searle, and C. Shahi, “Dynamics of understorey biomass, production and turnover associated with long-term overstorey succession in boreal forest of Canada,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 427, no. June, pp. 152–161, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.066.
O. Widenfalk and J. Weslien, “Plant species richness in managed boreal forests-Effects of stand succession and thinning,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 257, no. 5, pp. 1386–1394, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.010.
T. Økland, K. Rydgren, R. H. Økland, K. O. Storaunet, and J. Rolstad, “Variation in environmental conditions, understorey species number, abundance and composition among natural and managed Picea abies forest stands,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 177, no. 1–3, pp. 17–37, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00331-6.
J. Pykälä, “Immediate increase in plant species richness after clear-cutting of boreal herb-rich forests,” Appl Veg Sci, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2004.tb00592.x.
O. Zackrisson, “Influence of Forest Fires on the North Swedish Boreal Forest,” Oikos, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 22, 1977, doi: 10.2307/3543289.
D. Paré, Y. Bergeron, and C. Camiré, “Changes in the forest floor of Canadian southern boreal forest after disturbance,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 811–818, 1993, doi: 10.2307/3235619.
Y. Chen and Y. Cao, “Response of tree regeneration and understory plant species diversity to stand density in mature Pinus tabulaeformis plantations in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China,” Ecol Eng, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 238–245, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.055.
S. Bråkenhielm and Q. Liu, “Long-term effects of clear-felling on vegetation dynamics and species diversity in a boreal pine forest,” Biodivers Conserv, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 1998, doi: 10.1023/A:1008836502640.
W. H. Van der Putten et al., “Plant-soil feedbacks: The past, the present and future challenges,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 265–276, 2013, doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12054.
V. Marozas, “Early Succession of Ground Vegetation After Clear-Cuttings in Spruce Forests in a Boreonemoral Zone , Lithuania,” Acta Biologica Universitatis Daugavpiliensis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2005.
S.-W. Lu, F.-Q. Liu, X.-X. Yu, S.-S. Wang, X.-B. Yang, and C.-P. Li, “Studies on the Configuration and Function of Different Density of Pines in Rocky Mountain Area of Northern China,” Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 144–149, 2007.
A. Ali, D. Dai, K. Akhtar, M. Teng, Z. Yan, N. Urbina-Cardona, J. Mullerova, Z. Zhou, “Response of understory vegetation, tree regeneration, and soil quality to manipulated stand density in a Pinus massoniana plantation,” Glob Ecol Conserv, vol. 20, no. 1, p. e00775, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00775.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diāna Jansone, Agnese Liepiņa, Baiba Bambe, Jānis Donis, Āris Jansons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
