THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE BUSINESS COMPETITIVENESS

Authors

  • Evija Kļave Faculty of Business administration, Turiba University (LV)
  • Ieva Bruksle Faculty of Business administration, Turiba University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8661

Keywords:

business competitiveness, corporate social responsibility, social sustainability, social sustainability standards, large enterprises

Abstract

Sustainability is a critical factor in business competitiveness, shaping corporate strategies and long-term market positioning. While the environmental dimension is well understood and widely adopted, the social dimension remains underexplored, leading to significant challenges. Issues such as employee well-being, diversity and inclusion, stakeholder engagement, fair labour practices, and ethical governance are often inadequately addressed, despite their substantial impact on business resilience and performance. The aim of this study is to examine the role of the social dimension of sustainability in enhancing competitiveness, emphasising its equal importance alongside environmental and economic considerations. Socially responsible practices strengthen brand reputation, foster customer loyalty, drive innovation, and improve employee productivity - factors essential for maintaining a competitive edge in modern markets. The study employs a methodological approach based on primary and secondary data analysis, drawing insights from academic literature, policy documents, corporate sustainability and Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) reports, and sustainability expert interviews to provide a practical perspective on emerging trends, challenges, and best practices in implementing social sustainability initiatives in a real business environment. This multi-source approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of the current state and future directions of social sustainability of businesses. This study contributes to the growing discourse on sustainable business practices by demonstrating that social sustainability is not merely an ethical consideration but a fundamental element of corporate success. Enterprises face challenges related to defining, quantifying, and operationalising social sustainability. At the same time the results of the study show that European Sustainability Reporting Standards provide a comprehensive framework for corporate social sustainability initiatives of enterprises. The study’s results highlight the need for a structured, data-driven approach to defining and measuring the social dimension of sustainability for small and medium enterprises and serve as evidence-based methodological framework for further exploration of social sustainability as a core driver of business competitiveness.

References

T.J. Dean, J.S. McMullen, “Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, pp. 50–76, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003

M.F. Kamaludin, “Social sustainability within social entrepreneurship “, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 192, pp. 122541, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122541

A. Colantonio, “Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods,” Urban Research & Practice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 253–275, 2009.

C. Drago, L. Di Nallo, and M. L. Russotto, “Measuring and classifying the social sustainability of European banks: An analysis using interval-based composite indicators,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 105, p. 107434, 2024.

T. Popovic, A. Barbosa-Povoa, A. Kraslawski, and A. Carvalho, “Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 180, pp. 748–768, 2018.

D. Gallardo-Vázquez and M. I. Sanchez-Hernandez, “Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility for competitive success at a regional level,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 72, pp. 14–22, 2014.

J. Cader, R. Koneczna, and M. Smol, “Corporate social responsibility as a significant factor of competitive advantage - a case study of energy companies in Poland,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 7989–8001, 2022.

V. Ibáñez-Forés, V. Martínez-Sánchez, K. Valls-Val, and M. D. Bovea, “How do organisations communicate aspects related to their social performance? A proposed set of indicators and metrics for sustainability reporting,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 35, pp. 157–172, 2023.

OECD. “Global Corporate Sustainability Report 2024,” OECD Publishing, Paris, 2024.[Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/03/global-corporate-sustainability-report-2024_d8e1e8b4/8416b635-en.pdf [Accessed: 12.02.2025] https://doi.org/10.1787/8416b635-en

European Commission, "Commission Staff Working Document - Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, and Business and Human Rights: Overview of Progress," [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34482. [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

European Commission “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Next Steps for a Sustainable European Future. European Action for Sustainability”. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016DC0739 https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34482. [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

European Commission. Corporate sustainability reporting. [Online]. Available https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34482. [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

European Commission. “Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards”. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32023R2772 https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34482. [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

European Union, "Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups," Official Journal of the European Union, vol. L330, 23 Oct. 2014, pp. 1–9.

Latvijas Republikas Saeima. Ilgtspējības informācijas atklāšanas likums (26.09.2024.) [Sustainability Disclosure Law], Likumi.lv, [Online]. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/355381 [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025].

J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2013.

N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds., The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011.

Latvijas Finieris, "Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.finieris.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Latvijas-Finieris-Ilgtspejas-parskats-20231.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

Rīgas Lidosta, "Ilgtspējas ziņojums 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.riga-airport.com/lv/media/3064/download Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

Orkla Latvija, "Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.orkla.lv/ilgtspejas-parskats/[ Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

Latvijas Dzelzceļš, "Ilgtspējas un gada pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ldz.lv/sites/default/files/LDz-ilgstpejas-un-gada-parskats-2023.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

Rīgas Satiksme, "Ilgtspējas pārskats par 2023. gadu," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.rigassatiksme.lv/files/rp_sia_rigas_satiksme_ilgtspejas_parskats_par_2023_gadu_(5)_1.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

SAKRET, "ESG Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sakret.lv/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SAKRET_ESG_2023.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

SCHWENK Latvija, "Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://schwenk.lv/schwenk-latvija-ilgtspejas-parskats-2023/ [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

BALTA, "Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://balta.lv/uploads/FAILI/Gada_parskati/balta-ilgtspejas-parskats-2023.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

Rīgas Siltums, "Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.rs.lv/sites/default/files/page_file/ilgtspejas_parskats_2023.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

Swedbank AS, "Ilgtspējas ziņojums par 2023. gadu," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://blog.swedbank.lv/upload/content/swedbank-as-ilgtspejas-zinojums-par-2023-gadu.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]

CleanR Grupa, "Ilgtspējas pārskats 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cleanrgrupa.lv/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CleanR_Grupa_Ilgtspejas_parskats_30.04.2023_lv.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025] Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.

Downloads

Published

11.06.2025

How to Cite

[1]
E. Kļave and I. Bruksle, “THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE BUSINESS COMPETITIVENESS”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 289–295, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.17770/etr2025vol1.8661.