DIGITIZATION AS A FACTOR IN LOBBYING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN THE APPROVAL OF LEGAL ACTS IN LATVIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8659Keywords:
digital platforms for public participation, lobbying, legislation development, public governanceAbstract
The opportunity for the public to give their opinion and follow the development of legislation is not only a practice of full-fledged democracy and good governance, but also an opportunity for the public administration to obtain information, knowledge and analysis that it did not have access to. The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of digitisation on representation of interests and public involvement in the development of legislation in Latvia. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative data explored 4,943 legislative advancement processes in the Single Portal for Development and Harmonisation of Draft Legal Acts (TAP portal) between 2018 and 2024. Digitization of the final phase of the development of legal acts, i.e. public discussion and coordination in Latvia allows to assess: 1) how actively society is involved; 2) who does it – simple citizens or professional organizations; 3) whether digitization has increased public involvement; 4) whether public involvement significantly slows down decision-making.
The results show that the infrastructure of the TAP Portal has successfully promoted the involvement of organized interest groups in the process of harmonization of legal acts, mainly in the form of legal entities and associations. The participation of private individuals is small. The original objectives of the TAP Portal have been exceeded as it has been used by more than 600 different types of actors. At the same time, the hypothesis that organised groups significantly slow down decision-making processes was not confirmed; the length of decisions is more influenced by the political agenda and the nature of the legislation.
The study confirms the role of the Single Portal for Development and Harmonisation of Draft Legal Acts as an important platform in promoting transparency and efficiency in the development of legal acts. The authors recommend continuing to promote the use of this portal among interest groups, as this would enhance both transparency of the process and balanced representation of interests in the legislative process.
References
A. Rasmussen, L. K. Mäder and S. Reher, “With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion inadvocacy success.” in Comparative Political Studies, vol. 51(2), pp. 139–164, 2018. Available: Sage Journals, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414017695334 [Accessed Feb 12, 2025], DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334
I. De Bruycker and M. Hanegraaff, “The people versus the money: What drives interest group influence in the European Union?” in European Journal of Political Research, vol. 63, pp. 26-44, 2024. Available: Sage Journals, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414017695334 [Accessed Feb 12, 2025], DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12582
A. Zandere, Latvijas lēmumpieņēmēju uztvere par farmācijas lobēšanu, M. S. thesis, Turiba University, Riga, Latvia, 2024.
K. M. Esterling, The Political Economy of Expertise, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17547
R. L. Hall and A. V. Deardorff, “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy”in American Political Science Review, vol. 100(1), pp. 69-84, 2006. Available: Cambridge Core, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/lobbying-as-legislative-subsidy/AE4B5D8AB9C2487BB78C2A51BB53E03F [Accessed Feb 15, 2025], DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062010
M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041660
H. Demsetz, “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint” in The Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 12(1), pp. 1–22, 1969. http://www.jstor.org/stable/724977 [Accessed: Feb 15, 2025]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466657
U. Plesner, L. Justesen and C. Glerup. “The Transformation of Work in Digitized Public Sector Organizations.” in Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 31(5), pp. 1176-1190, 2018. Available: Emerald insight, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jocm-06-2017-0257/full/html [Accessed Feb 18, 2025], DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2017-0257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2017-0257
Order of the Cabinet of Ministers no. 639 “Sabiedrības līdzdalības kārtība attīstības plānošanas procesā”. Adoption: Oct 15, 2024. Publication: Latvijas Vēstnesis, vol. 202, Oct 16, .2024. Available: Likumi.lv https://likumi.lv/ta/id/355632-sabiedribas-lidzdalibas-kartiba-attistibas-planosanas-procesa [Accessed Jan 20, 2025].
State Administration Structure Law of the Republic of Latvia. Adoption: Jun 6, 2002. Publication: Latvijas Vēstnesis, vol. 94, Jun 21, 2002. Available: Likumi.lv https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/63545 [Accessed Jan. 22, 2025].
Law on Transparency of Interest Representation of the Republic of Latvia. Adoption: Oct 13, 2022. Publication: Latvijas Vēstnesis, vol. 207, Oct 25, 2022. Available: Likumi.lv https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/336676 [Accessed Jan 12, 2025].
The Single Portal for Development and Harmonisation of Draft Legal Acts (TAP portal), legal acts. Available: https://tapportals.mk.gov.lv/legal_acts [Accessed: Nov-Dec, 2024].
“Ietekmīgāko lobistu loks nemainās”, Journal “Dienas Bizness”, 2015, March 27, Page 4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kristaps Klauss, Raivis Kronbergs, Renate Cane
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
