FRAME SEMANTICS IN THE DOMAIN OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES FOR LOGISTICS AND DATA TRANSMISSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8630Keywords:
frame-based theory, unmanned aerial vehicles, UAV, logisticsAbstract
With the rapid development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), the demand for precise documentation has become essential. This evolution has introduced a new layer of terminology into Aviation English, as the communication and operational requirements of UAVs differ significantly from those of traditional manned aircraft, particularly in the context of logistics and data transmission. Recognizing this, ICAO and other aviation bodies are working to standardize UAV-related terminology, as inconsistent interpretations can lead to miscommunication. This article provides an overview of frame semantics theory and explores UAV applications in logistics and data transmission. It addresses the significance of frame-based terminology as an analytical tool for understanding the complexities of UAV discourse. Utilizing Sketch Engine, this study analyzes the frequency and collocation patterns of terms within the UAV field, providing valuable insights into the underlying frames that shape technical English in aviation. This analysis highlights multi-word terms and frames, revealing a significantly higher frequency of nouns compared to verbs, indicating a preference for descriptive terminology within the UAV domain. By studying UAV-related terminology, this research offers valuable insights into how technological advancements influence and expand specialized professional languages like aviation English.
References
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Circular 328, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), 2011.
P. Faber, C. M. Linares, and M. V. Expósito, “Framing terminology: A process-oriented approach,” Meta: Translators’ Journal, vol. 50, no. 4, 2005. Available: https://doi.org/10.7202/019916ar
C. Fillmore, “Frames and the semantics of understanding,” Quaderni di Semantica, vol. 6, pp. 222–253, 1985.
C. Fillmore and S. Atkins, “FrameNet and lexicographic relevance,” in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Language Resource & Evaluation, Granada, Spain, May 28–30, 1998, pp. 417–423.
P. Faber, “The dynamics of specialized knowledge representation: Simulational reconstruction or the perception-action interface,” Terminology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9–29, 2011.
P. Faber, “Frames as a framework for terminology,” in Handbook of Terminology, vol. 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 2015.
E. Friginal and J. Roberts, “Corpora for materials design,” in The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning, A. Jablonkai and E. Csomay, Eds. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2022, pp. 131–146.
Z. Gacovski, Ed., Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Drones. Waretown, NJ, USA: Arcler Press, 2021.
M. Abdelkader and A. Koubaa, Eds., Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Application: Challenges and Trends. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2023.
S. Suman, Drone Development from Concept to Flight. Birmingham, U.K.: Packt Publishing Ltd, 2024.
K. P. Valavanis and G. J. Vachtsevanos, Eds., Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015.
S. Mohsan, N. Othman, Y. Li, et al., “Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends,” Intell. Serv. Robot., vol. 16, pp. 109–137, 2023.
Sketch Engine. [Online]. Available: https://www.sketchengine.eu/ [Accessed: Dec. 3, 2024]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vanya Katsarska, Georgi Stanchev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
