ENHANCING NATIONAL INNOVATION FRAMEWORKS THROUGH OPEN INNOVATION: A THEORETICAL APPROACH TO INTEGRATING OPEN INNOVATION PRINCIPLES INTO THE EUROPEAN INNOVATION SCOREBOARD

Authors

  • Kristaps Banga Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management Riga Technical University (LV)
  • Elina Gaile -Sarkane Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management Riga Technical University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8625

Keywords:

European innovation scoreboard, innovation ecosystems, national innovation metrics, open innovation measurement

Abstract

Despite the growing prominence of Open Innovation (OI) in business and policy, National Innovation Metrics (NIM) remain largely rooted in traditional, firm-centric models, failing to capture ecosystem-wide collaboration and knowledge exchange This study critically examines how OI is integrated - or overlooked - within major Innovation Measurement Frameworks (IMF), particularly the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS), Global Innovation Index (GII), and Bloomberg Innovation Index (BII). Findings reveal that existing innovation scoreboards prioritize input-output indicators (e.g., R&D expenditure, patenting) while neglecting systemic, network-driven innovation dynamics. The continued absence of OI-specific metrics reinforces a "black box" effect, where national innovation success is assessed without visibility into knowledge flows and collaborative innovation mechanisms. This study contributes to rethinking NIM by advocating for a shift from closed-system assessments to dynamic, network-based measurement models. By bridging innovation policy, measurement theory, and OI research, it provides a foundation for future empirical studies on integrating OI indicators into national benchmarking frameworks, ensuring more accurate assessments of Innovation Ecosystem (IE) performance.

References

H. Chesbrough, “OI: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology,” Harvard Business School Press. 2003

M. Bogers, H. Chesbrough, and C. Moedas, "OI: Research, practices, and policies," California Management Review, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 5–16, 2017.

J. West, A. Salter, W. Vanhaverbeke, and H. Chesbrough, "OI: The next decade," Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 805–811, 2014.

L. Dahlander and D. M. Gann, "How open is innovation?," Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 699–709, 2010.

European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard 2023: Assessing innovation performance in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.

Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO, Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2022.

B.-Å. Lundvall, “National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning”. London, UK: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

J. West and M. Bogers, "Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on OI," Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 814–831, 2014.

W. R. Ashby, “An introduction to cybernetics”. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1956.

R. Adner, "Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy," Journal of Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 39–58, 2016.

D. Foray, P. A. David, and B. Hall, "Smart specialization: From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation," MTEI Working Paper, 2012.

A. Radziwon and M. Bogers, "OI in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 146, pp. 573–587, 2019.

G. Robertson and I. Lapiņa, "Digital transformation as a catalyst for sustainability and OI," Journal of OI: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 17, 2023.

R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, “An evolutionary theory of economic change”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

H. Chesbrough, “Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape.” Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2006.

D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, "Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review," British Journal of Management, vol. 14, 2003.

OECD/Eurostat, Oslo Manual 2018: “Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation”, 4th ed. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2018.

Z. Griliches, "Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey," Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1661–1707, 1990.

M. Nardo, M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola, “Tools for composite indicators building”. Luxembourg: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2005.

C. Edquist, "Institutions and organization in system of innovation," in Systems of Innovation. London, UK: Pinter, 1997.

M. G. Jacobides, C. Cennamo, and A. Gawer, "Towards a theory of ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2255–2276, 2018.

A. Gawer and M. A. Cusumano, "Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 417–433, May 2014.

K. Laursen and A. Salter, "Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 131–150, 2006.

N. Rosenberg, “Exploring the black box: Technology, economics, and history.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Bloomberg, Bloomberg Innovation Index 2023: Ranking the world’s most innovative economies. New York, NY: Bloomberg L.P., 2023.

E. Naqbi, M. Alshurideh, A. Alhamad, and B. al Kurdi, "The impact of innovation on firm performance: A systematic review," International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 2020.

OECD, OECD patent statistics manual. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2009.

C. C. Cheng and E. K. Huizingh, "When is OI beneficial? The role of entrepreneurial orientation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1235–1253, 2014.

M. Metaiche, "Linking national innovation systems and innovation capacity," Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, vol. 4, pp. 8–26, 2024.

F. Ogosi, F. Andem, A. Inwang, and S. Etuk, "Technology innovation as strategic drivers for entrepreneurial growth," Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), vol. 40, pp. 206–214, 2024.

A. Larysa, L. Ligonenko, D. Ilnytskyy, and O. Denisova, "Evaluating the National Innovation Systems of EU Countries through Innovation Indicators," presented Feb. 2024.

H. Lu, D. Du, and X. Qin, "Assessing the dual innovation capability of national innovation system: Empirical evidence from 65 countries," Systems, vol. 10, p. 23, 2022.

A. Vetsikas and Y. Stamboulis, "A conceptual framework for modeling heterogeneous actors’ behavior in national innovation systems," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 33, 2023.

Downloads

Published

11.06.2025

How to Cite

[1]
K. Banga and E. Gaile -Sarkane, “ENHANCING NATIONAL INNOVATION FRAMEWORKS THROUGH OPEN INNOVATION: A THEORETICAL APPROACH TO INTEGRATING OPEN INNOVATION PRINCIPLES INTO THE EUROPEAN INNOVATION SCOREBOARD”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 59–67, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.17770/etr2025vol1.8625.