THE INTERSECTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EMPLOYMENT LEGAL RELATIONS: BALACING EMPLOYER INTERESTS WITH FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN AI-DRIVEN EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES

Authors

  • Agnese Reine Faculty of Social Sciences, Riga Stradiņš University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol2.8571

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Business Objectives in Employment, Non-discrimination, Rights to Privacy

Abstract

In the era of rapid technological advancement, artificial intelligence (hereinafter “AI”) has profoundly transformed various sectors, notably employment. The integration of AI in employment practices represents a significant paradigm shift, enhancing efficiencies but also introducing substantial challenges. This integration poses complex legal issues, particularly in balancing employer interests with employees' fundamental rights, in particular to privacy. As of August 1, 2024, the European Artificial Intelligence Act (hereinafter "AI Act") was enacted. This legislation introduces a risk-based framework that mandates specific responsibilities for both providers and deployers of AI systems. Within the context of employment legal relationships and the integration of various AI systems therein, it is crucial to conduct a thorough analysis of the interplay between the General Data Protection Regulation and the stipulations of the AI Act. This article examines the legal frameworks that regulate rights to privacy and AI-driven employment practices, emphasizing the imperative to reconcile employer objectives—such as productivity and cost-efficiency—with employees' rights to privacy, non-discrimination, and equitable treatment. Through a detailed comparative analysis of extant legislation and case law, this study identifies deficiencies in current legal protections and advocates for a framework that ensures AI systems in employment conform to fairness and human rights principles. The article argues for a proactive legislative approach that not only addresses current challenges but also anticipates future ethical and legal issues arising from advancements in AI technology.

 
Supporting Agencies
This study was funded by the project "RSU internal and RSU with LSPA external consolidation”, No. 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/005

References

European Council, General Secretariat of the Council, “European Council meeting (19 October 2017) – Conclusions,” EUCO 14/17, October 19, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14-2017-INIT/en/pdf . [Accessed: Feb. 1, 2025].

“European approach to artificial intelligence,” Apr. 9, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-approach-artificial-intelligence. [Accessed: Apr. 17, 2025].

“Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parlianment and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act),” Jul. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401689. [Accessed: Feb. 1, 2025].

“Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, (2000/C 364/01), Official Journal of the European Communities,” C364/1, Dec. 18, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf. [Accessed: Feb. 1, 2025].

“European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe,” Sep. 3, 1953. [Online]. Available: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG [Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025]

European Court of Human Rights judgement, “Niemietz v. Germany,” 13710/88, Dec. 16, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57887. [Accessed: Feb.21, 2025]

“Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation),” OJ L 119, May 4, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679. [Accessed: Feb.21, 2025]

European Union Agency on Fundamental Rights, “Bias in Algorithms – Artificial Intellligence and Discrimination,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2022-bias-in-algorithms_en.pdf. [Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025].

“Bias in AI amplifies our own biases,” Dec. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2024/dec/bias-ai-amplifies-our-own-biases#:~:text=Artificial%20intelligence%20(AI)%20systems%20tend,new%20study%20by%20UCL%20researchers. [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025]. M. Glickman and T. Sharot, “How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements,” Nature Humane Behaviour, vol. 9, no.2, p. 345, February 2025. Available: Nature Human Behaviour, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02077-2 [Accessed: Feb. 23, 2025], https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2

Downloads

Published

08.06.2025

How to Cite

[1]
A. Reine, “THE INTERSECTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EMPLOYMENT LEGAL RELATIONS: BALACING EMPLOYER INTERESTS WITH FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN AI-DRIVEN EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 277–283, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.17770/etr2025vol2.8571.