Visual Representa of a Woman in the Semiotic Landscape of the Baltic States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/amcd2014.1340Keywords:
advertisement, archetype, ergonym, semiotic landscape, social semiotics, visual image, visual communication, womenAbstract
Linguistic landscape (LL) research of nine cities of the Baltic States shows that feminine discourse is of an essential significance in the public space. This is linguistically proved by feminine person’s names in ergonyms, also by female ergonyms and graffiti themes. However, there are multi-modal advertisements reflecting women and female items in the public space, and they are to be viewed from the perspective of the semiotic landscape. There are 294 photos reflecting a woman excerpted from the LL data base to describe visual images of a woman, focusing on the archetypes and concepts on woman’s role in society. There is a semiotic landscape research method, perception of a visual identity in advertising marketing and pop-culture, theories of the archetypes used in research. There are theoretical issues of research discussed, as well as stated target audience described linguistically and visually in the article. Furthermore, there is a general description of the excerpted material provided emphasizing typical features and interpreting several advertisements. There is an elaborated analysis of the social roles and archetypical images of visually demonstrated women given. At the end there are conclusions and a summary.Downloads
References
Backhaus, P. (2007). Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Baker, P. (2008). Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. London: Equinox.
Block, D. (2006). Multilingual Identities in a Global City. London Stories. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruner, E., Kelso, J. P. (1980). The Voices and Words of Women and Men. New York: Pergamo Bjökqvn Press.
Bucholtz, M., Hall, K. (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33(4). United Kingdom: Cambridge University press. p. 501-547.
Cameron, D., Kulick, D. (2003). Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7. Finkelstein, J. (2007). The Art of Self Invention. Image and Identity in Popular Visual Culture. London & New York: I. B. Tauris.
Dawson, T.(2013). Visual Identity for 21th Century Brands. Skatīts: 20.05.2014.http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/2013/06h/visual-identity-for-21st-century-brands.html#.U7z7OJR_t1o.
De Muijck, D. (2009). Psychoanalysis and attitudes in modern adverisement. Germany: Grin.
Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisement. New York, Washington, Syngapore: Harper Torchbook.
Gorter, D. (ed., 2006). Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jaworski, A., Thurlow, C. (eds., 2010). Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.
Jewitt, C. (1998). How to produce inclusive resources. G. Lenderyou, C. Ray (eds). Let’s Hear It for the Boys! London: National Children’s Bureau.
King, B. (2012). Location, lore and language: An erotic triangle. Journal of Language and Sexuality. 1 (1). Netherland: Benjamins. p. 106-125.
Kress, G. R., Van Leeuven, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. USA & Canada: Routledge.
Lankovskis, A. (2010). Par arhetipu nozīmi reklāmā. Skatīts 21.05.2014. http://www.db.lv/laikraksta- arhivs/citas/par-arhetipu-nozimi-cilveku-dzive-un-marketinga-299550.
Lazdiņa, S., Pošeiko, S., Marten, H. F. (2013). Baltijas valstu lingvistiskā ainava: dati, rezultāti, nākotnes pētījumu perspektīvas. Lazdiņa, S. (red.). Via Latgalica V. Humanitāro zinātņu žurnāls. Rēzekne: RA. 37.-48. lpp.
Mark, M., Pearson, C. S. (2005). Герой и бунтарь. Создание бренда с помощью архетипов. СПб., Питер.
Marten, H. F., Lazdiņa, S., Pošeiko, S., Murinska, S. (2012). Between Old and New Killer Languages? Linguistic Transformation, Linguae Francae and Languages of Tourism in the Baltic States. Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. p. 289-308.
Milani, T. M. (2013). Whither linguistic landscapes? The sexed facets of ordinary signs. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter. Paper 53.
Piller, I. (2010). Sex in the city: On making space and identity in travel spaces. Semiotic landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum. p. 123-136.
Pošeiko, S. (2012). Afiša kā interaktīva zīme Rēzeknes pilsētas ainavā. Dzintars N. (sast.). VIA SCIENTIARUM I. Ventspils, Liepāja. 225.-242. lpp.
Pošeiko, S. (2013). Grafiti pilsētvidē: vēsture, izveide un uztvere. Bušs, O. (atb. red.). Linguistica Lettica 21. Latviešu valodas institūta žurnāls, Rīga. 133.-166. lpp.
Prokudina, O. A. (2011). Constructing Gender Identities through Commercial Names in the Linguistic Landscape of the City Nal’chik. Cuadernos de Rusística Española Nº 7. Granada: Ugr. p. 81-85.
Rupā, U., Zitmane, M. (2007). 9. Saeimas priekšvēlēšanu politiskās reklāmas televīzijā: rāmējumi, naratīvi un arhetipi. Zelče, V., Brikše, I. (red.). Latvijas Republikas 9. Saeimas vēlēšanu kampaņa: priekšvēlēšanu publiskā telpa. Rīga: Zinātne. 272.-290. lpp.
Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E., Gorter, D. (eds., 2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York, NY & London: Routledge.
Silbert, C. (2008). Chameleon. Butterfly. Draconfly. Del Mar, California, 2008. p. 51-101.
Sullivan, N. (2003). A critical introduction to queer theory. New York: NYU Press.
Бабайцев, А. В. (2010). Архетипи в политической рекламе. Дорошина Б. А. Архетипы и архетипическое в культуре и социальных отношениях. Пенза, Ереван, Прага: Социосфера с. 178.-182.
Иващенко, А. (2005). Теория архетипов и практика брендинга. Skatīts 26.05.2014. http://www.advertology.ru/ print19720.htm.
Коптев, С., Кларк, Н. и др. (2003). Человечный маркетинг. Москва: Медиадом.
Марк, M., Пирсон, K. (2005). Герой и бунтарь. Создание бренда с помощью архетипов. СПб.: Питер.
Юнг, К. Г. (1991). Архетип и символ. Москва, Renaissance IV Ewо. с. 82-96.
