ESTABLISHMENT AND ACTIVITIES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: CHALLENGE FOR XXI CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v1i70.4326Abstract
Without any doubts, we have to recognize that the establishment of International Criminal Court (ICC) is positive step in international humanitarian and criminal law, in order to call to account persons, who has committed the most serious war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide. The authority of the ICC internationally reduces the fact that United States of America and Russian Federation have not become member states of the ICC. The brief analysis of the court practice of the ICC proves that ICC acts according to the rule of law, taking into account its independent status. In order to improve legal proceedings of the ICC, we have to find innovative mechanisms in cooperation with bodies and institutions of the United Nations Organization, to push the Member states of the United Nations Organization to actively cooperate with ICC; for example – to execute orders of the arrest of the accused persons. The special treatment must be in cases, when Heads of the State has been accused.Downloads
References
H. Patch with R. Van Emden. The Last Fighting Tommy. London: Bloomsbury, 2009. P. 201.
N. Ferguson. The First World War, A Miscellany. Chichester: Summerdale, 2014. P. 165.
H. Strachan. The War to End All Wars? Lessons of World War I I Revisited. In: Foreign Affairs, January/February, 2003. Pieejams: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/58637/hew-strachan/the-war-to-end-all-wars-lessons-of-world-war-i-revisited (aplūkots 02.02.2015).
A. Fogelis. Modernās starptautiskās tiesības. Zvaigzne ABC, 2009, 172.-173. lpp.
J. Bojārs. Starptautiskās publiskās tiesības III. Zvaigzne ABC, 2007, 541.-633. lpp.
A.Ušacka. Starptautiskās Krimināltiesas izaicinājums nesodāmībai un tās ietekme uz valstu ārpolitiku. Pieejams: http://www.president.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_532_Anita_Usacka.pdf (aplūkots 01.02.2015).
Krūma K., Starptautiskā krimināltiesa jeb spēle bez trumpjiem. Pieejams:http://www.politika.lv/temas/pilsoniska_sabiedriba/6399/ (aplūkots 01.02.2015).
B. Kingsbury. International courts: uneven judicialisation in global order. In: The Cambridge Companion to International Law. Edited by J.Crawford and M.Koskenniemi. Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 203.
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg – angļu val.
International Military Tribunal for the Far East in Tokyo – angļu val.
B.Kingsbury. International courts: uneven judicialisation in global order. In: The Cambridge Companion to International Law. Edited by J.Crawford and M.Koskenniemi. Cambridge University Press, 2012, p.207.
International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia – angļu val. Par tās darbību sīkāk skatīt:www.icty.org/ (aplūkots 29.01.2015).
Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone – angļu val. Par tās darbību sīkāk skatīt: http://www.rscsl.org/ (aplūkots 29.01.2015).http://www.icty.org/sid/324#bringing (aplūkots 29.01.2015).
Romas Starptautiskās krimināltiesas statūti: starptautisks līgums, Latvijas Vēstnesis, 28.06.2002.
Ibid.
Četras Ženēvas konvencijas: Konvencija par civiliedzīvotāju aizsardzību kara laikā: starptautisks līgums, Latvijas Vēstnesis,19.04.2002; Konvencija par attieksmi pret karagūstekņiem: starptautisks līgums, Latvijas Vēstnesis, 05.04.2002; Konvencija par jūras bruņoto spēku ievainoto, slimo un kuģu avārijās cietušo stāvokļa uzlabošanu: starptautisks līgums, Latvijas Vēstnesis, 27.03.2002; Konvencijas par sauszemes bruņoto spēku ievainoto un slimo stāvokļa uzlabošanu: starptautisks līgums, Latvijas vēstnesis, 22.03.2002.
Pieejams: http://www.icccpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/Pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx (aplūkots 03.02.2015).
Statement of the European Union on the position of the United States towards the International Criminal Court. Brussels, 14 May 2002.Pieejams: www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/.../70471.pdf (aplūkots 03.02.2015).
J. Bojārs. Starptautiskās publiskās tiesības III. Zvaigzne ABC, 2007, 563. lpp.
Ibid.
Pieejams: http://www.icccpi.int/en_menus/icc/press%20and%20media/press%20releases/Documents/997/declarationVerkhovnaRadaEng.pdf (aplūkots 03.02.2015).
Lietu materiāli pieejami: http://www.icccpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/cases/Pages/cases%20index.aspx (aplūkots 03.05.2015).
International Criminal Court for Rwanda – angļu val.
Prosecutor vs. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Decision establishing the principles and procedures to be applied to reparations (Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06) 7 August 2012 Pieejams: http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc1447971.pdf (aplūkots 03.02.2015).
Cadelo. Redress and reparation for victims of armed conflict: a critical review of practise in 2013. In: The war Report. Armed Conflict in 2013. Edited by S.Casey- Maslen. Oxford University press,2014. P.565.
