UNUSED POSSIBILITIES OF DETECTIVE ACTIVITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v2i79.2807Abstract
Legal regulation of Lithuanian, Latvian, Russian private detectives activities provide additional opportunities for private detectives to create added value in their practice. Special laws of the countries in question that regulate their activities, give private detectives exclusive rights to provide detective services, therefore activities of other entities in this field is considered unlawful, and carries administrative and criminal liability. Another important statutory regulatory aspect of detective activities is that detectives can be recognized by law, within certain boundaries, to legally collect information about another persons private life, which is completely forbidden for any other private individual and collecting another person's private information, caries criminal and civil liability. And so the legislator has strictly limited the amount of entities that can provide services within the scope of detective activities and the content they are allowed to handle. The author presents two types of services as an example: the search of a debtor and his assets, a person's solvency and reliability evaluation. It is recommendable to employ educational measures to expand market demand for legal services that only detectives have the right to provide.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Law on Detective Activity. http://www.vvc.gov.lv/export/sites/default/docs/LRTA/Likumi/Law_on_Detective_Activity.doc
Закон «О частной детективной и охранной деятельности в Российской Федерации».https://01.xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/upload/site3/bc2a8f75c3c88378d8604a17cab494c1.pdf
Lietuvos Respublikos privačios detektyvinės veiklos įstatymas. https://www.e-tar.lt
Романовский Г.Б. Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни. – М., 2001, с. 4, 63-65.
Downloads
Published
30.06.2017
Issue
Section
Sub-Branch of Police Law
How to Cite
Zaleckis, R. (2017). UNUSED POSSIBILITIES OF DETECTIVE ACTIVITIES. Administrative and Criminal Justice, 2(79), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v2i79.2807